![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all!
As a non-native english speaker learning to fly in UK, I found that the most challenging part of flying lessons is talking with controllers and understanding what other pilot say. To get some practice I got ordinary, 20-bucks FM radio changed so I could receive frequency up to 135 MHz. London Heathrow approach is (probably) 130.25, but despite living nearby, I can't receive it. Is the radio too weak or I'm missing something? Some guy said air communication is digital, but somehow I don't believe it. Or maybe you guys have some other hints for me? Thanks, Lukasz |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No.. most if not all civil voice communications is NOT digital, but analog.
Its ALSO "AM". Even though you are in the 108-135 mHz band, adjacent to the "good times radio" band... you are trying to listen to an "amplitude modulated" signal with a "frequency modulated" reciever. If you want to listen to aviation chatter, just part with the $$ (or pounds) and get an aviation band scanner. It should cost no more than 2 hours worth of flight instruction if US prices are any indication. Dave Lukasz W wrote: Hi all! As a non-native english speaker learning to fly in UK, I found that the most challenging part of flying lessons is talking with controllers and understanding what other pilot say. To get some practice I got ordinary, 20-bucks FM radio changed so I could receive frequency up to 135 MHz. London Heathrow approach is (probably) 130.25, but despite living nearby, I can't receive it. Is the radio too weak or I'm missing something? Some guy said air communication is digital, but somehow I don't believe it. Or maybe you guys have some other hints for me? Thanks, Lukasz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An FM receiver won't demodulate an AM carrier. An AM reciever
will, to an extent, demodulate an FM carrier if tuned slightly off center frequency (called slope detecting). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also consider the free alternative, listening to tower communication
over the internet. Websites like liveatc.com provide links to this, and the reception will undoubtedly be better then what you can get from a handheld antenna, as most of the transmission is line-of-sight. It may be the difference between hearing both the tower and the plane versus infrequently getting one signal. Ben Hallert PP-ASEL |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whoops, that was supposed to be http://www.liveatc.net , the .com
website has very poor reception indeed, unless you are looking for advertisements about purchasing domains. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would explain why I can receive Kiss108 (107.9) on my VOR
"kontiki" wrote in message ... An FM receiver won't demodulate an AM carrier. An AM reciever will, to an extent, demodulate an FM carrier if tuned slightly off center frequency (called slope detecting). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point - unless you are close to the transmitter, you typically
hear only one side of the conversation. There's also a piece of software (Com1?) that you can install on your PC to practice and listen to yourself. I found it helpful when working on my instrument rating - never had a problem with the communications part of it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is exactly correct. Making a front end filter to pass tens of watts of
108.0 to 117.9 and reject megawatts ERP of 107.9 ain't gonna happen. Jim "Steve Foley" wrote in message news:3HTye.3820$vu5.3727@trndny08... That would explain why I can receive Kiss108 (107.9) on my VOR "kontiki" wrote in message ... An FM receiver won't demodulate an AM carrier. An AM reciever will, to an extent, demodulate an FM carrier if tuned slightly off center frequency (called slope detecting). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave S" wrote in message ink.net... No.. most if not all civil voice communications is NOT digital, but analog. Its ALSO "AM". Even though you are in the 108-135 mHz band, adjacent to the "good times radio" band... you are trying to listen to an "amplitude modulated" signal with a "frequency modulated" reciever. If you want to listen to aviation chatter, just part with the $$ (or pounds) and get an aviation band scanner. It should cost no more than 2 hours worth of flight instruction if US prices are any indication. On the grounds of OSH, I can consistently get (I ASSume) a Chicago center transmitter on my regular FM radio, most likely the OSH VOR relay. Must be a harmonic, or something. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
Lost Radio Communication Procedure | [email protected] | Soaring | 9 | March 2nd 05 04:35 PM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
monitoring China air communication with a radio in Taiwan | Dan Jacobson | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | November 23rd 03 09:40 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |