A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

first approach in IMC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 11th 05, 08:51 AM
G. Sylvester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default first approach in IMC


I got my IA on June 2nd. June 17th I took some friends up and I poked
through a puff of a cloud. It was IMC but only about 0.01 hours but
it counted. Well today I was flying back to the bay area from
up north. SQL was reporting scattered at 2500 and I wanted to shoot
an approach with my pilot friend as safety pilot and without ticking
off approach for the GPS into SQL or waiting forever to shoot it.
I figured I'd shoot the HWD LOC-DME 28L and then break off VFR to SQL.
Well my friend said, "hmm, we'll be flying through some clouds. cool."
He's starting his IFR training tomorrow. Well about 2600 MSL we
entered the clouds. We broke out inside the FAF about 850 MSL (800 AGL)
with an MDA of 400. No problem at all. I got 11 hours of actual during
my training and the probably 20 hours at night (good substitute) so I
I'm semi-comfortable in IMC but certainly won't push it in LIFR.

Interestingly, they usually have you maintain VFR at or below 1000 until
the shoreline. It was clear for the most part past the shoreline.
We broke off at 700 and turned to the shore. I quickly realized it
was a bad idea. I basically did a circle
to land back on 28L. Tower knew what was happening (they knew I was
goiing to SQL VFR). While on base
they arranged for an IFR clearance to SQL (route = Radar vectors).
I got RV out over the bay and cancelled IFR.

Wow. I thought only "real" pilots did this stuff. I'm not
about to start going down to minimums in the mountains, single
engine at night but for the first time I realized, "wow, no
instructor and, holy sh*t, I can really do this."

Gerald Sylvester



  #2  
Old July 11th 05, 02:07 PM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:51:17 GMT, "G. Sylvester"
wrote:


Wow. I thought only "real" pilots did this stuff. I'm not
about to start going down to minimums in the mountains, single
engine at night but for the first time I realized, "wow, no
instructor and, holy sh*t, I can really do this."


Empowering, isn't it?


  #3  
Old July 11th 05, 02:12 PM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Real IMC is all about what happens when something goes wrong. That
should give you something to think about. Nice job and good luck in the
future.

  #4  
Old July 11th 05, 04:10 PM
Mark Hansen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 7/11/2005 00:51, G. Sylvester wrote:

[ snip great story ]

Wow. I thought only "real" pilots did this stuff. I'm not
about to start going down to minimums in the mountains, single
engine at night but for the first time I realized, "wow, no
instructor and, holy sh*t, I can really do this."

Gerald Sylvester


Yesterday was my Part 141 Stage II flight check. This was the first
time I've shot a practice approach without my CFII's help. At first,
I was a little nervous, but then I realized that I've done this a
few times now, and I know how it works (as much as I can at this point
in my training, anyway). After that, I calmed down and flew the
approaches!

It was a great feeling!

--
Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Student
Sacramento, CA
  #5  
Old July 11th 05, 09:11 PM
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Never descend until you feel comfortable about your location. You can always
ask for delay vectors or just plain ask to stay (relatively) high until you
feel comfortable. Just because ATC says "Descend and maintain...." does not
mean that you have to obey without question. Use this sparingly, however,
lest you be vectored 20 miles away while everyone else shoots the approach.

Bob Gardner

"G. Sylvester" wrote in message
. ..

I got my IA on June 2nd. June 17th I took some friends up and I poked
through a puff of a cloud. It was IMC but only about 0.01 hours but
it counted. Well today I was flying back to the bay area from
up north. SQL was reporting scattered at 2500 and I wanted to shoot
an approach with my pilot friend as safety pilot and without ticking
off approach for the GPS into SQL or waiting forever to shoot it.
I figured I'd shoot the HWD LOC-DME 28L and then break off VFR to SQL.
Well my friend said, "hmm, we'll be flying through some clouds. cool."
He's starting his IFR training tomorrow. Well about 2600 MSL we
entered the clouds. We broke out inside the FAF about 850 MSL (800 AGL)
with an MDA of 400. No problem at all. I got 11 hours of actual during
my training and the probably 20 hours at night (good substitute) so I
I'm semi-comfortable in IMC but certainly won't push it in LIFR.

Interestingly, they usually have you maintain VFR at or below 1000 until
the shoreline. It was clear for the most part past the shoreline.
We broke off at 700 and turned to the shore. I quickly realized it
was a bad idea. I basically did a circle
to land back on 28L. Tower knew what was happening (they knew I was
goiing to SQL VFR). While on base
they arranged for an IFR clearance to SQL (route = Radar vectors).
I got RV out over the bay and cancelled IFR.

Wow. I thought only "real" pilots did this stuff. I'm not
about to start going down to minimums in the mountains, single
engine at night but for the first time I realized, "wow, no
instructor and, holy sh*t, I can really do this."

Gerald Sylvester





  #6  
Old July 11th 05, 10:28 PM
Michelle P
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

it still amazes me when I shoot an approach and the airport appears in
front of me. very satisfying.
Michelle

G. Sylvester wrote:


I got my IA on June 2nd. June 17th I took some friends up and I poked
through a puff of a cloud. It was IMC but only about 0.01 hours but
it counted. Well today I was flying back to the bay area from
up north. SQL was reporting scattered at 2500 and I wanted to shoot
an approach with my pilot friend as safety pilot and without ticking
off approach for the GPS into SQL or waiting forever to shoot it.
I figured I'd shoot the HWD LOC-DME 28L and then break off VFR to SQL.
Well my friend said, "hmm, we'll be flying through some clouds. cool."
He's starting his IFR training tomorrow. Well about 2600 MSL we
entered the clouds. We broke out inside the FAF about 850 MSL (800 AGL)
with an MDA of 400. No problem at all. I got 11 hours of actual during
my training and the probably 20 hours at night (good substitute) so I
I'm semi-comfortable in IMC but certainly won't push it in LIFR.

Interestingly, they usually have you maintain VFR at or below 1000 until
the shoreline. It was clear for the most part past the shoreline.
We broke off at 700 and turned to the shore. I quickly realized it
was a bad idea. I basically did a circle
to land back on 28L. Tower knew what was happening (they knew I was
goiing to SQL VFR). While on base
they arranged for an IFR clearance to SQL (route = Radar vectors).
I got RV out over the bay and cancelled IFR.

Wow. I thought only "real" pilots did this stuff. I'm not
about to start going down to minimums in the mountains, single
engine at night but for the first time I realized, "wow, no
instructor and, holy sh*t, I can really do this."

Gerald Sylvester




  #7  
Old July 11th 05, 10:41 PM
Sylvain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michelle P wrote:
it still amazes me when I shoot an approach and the airport appears in
front of me. very satisfying.


the ultimate video game.

--Sylvain
  #8  
Old July 12th 05, 12:47 AM
G. Sylvester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Gardner wrote:
Never descend until you feel comfortable about your location. You can always
ask for delay vectors or just plain ask to stay (relatively) high until you
feel comfortable. Just because ATC says "Descend and maintain...." does not
mean that you have to obey without question.


I asked my CFI about descending when cleared for an approach. He said
exactly what you said. Calculate your 500 fpm descent to arrive at
the crossing altitude a few miles before you reach the fix. I did this
on my checkride and got a compliment over it from the DE. He said he's
used to students descending immediately even though they could be far
far away from the fix. I gotta thank my friend Mark who flies for UA
as he gave me a good way of briefing for this using the MSA.

Use this sparingly, however,
lest you be vectored 20 miles away while everyone else shoots the approach.
Bob Gardner


especially considering it was into HWD which is right underneath and
overlapping the approach paths for OAK.

Gerald

  #9  
Old July 12th 05, 12:49 AM
G. Sylvester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nathan Young wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:51:17 GMT, "G. Sylvester"
wrote:



Wow. I thought only "real" pilots did this stuff. I'm not
about to start going down to minimums in the mountains, single
engine at night but for the first time I realized, "wow, no
instructor and, holy sh*t, I can really do this."

Empowering, isn't it?


yes. I thought only Airline pilots do this. Not lil' ole me.

And a thanks to everyone for my all the discussions too!

Gerald
  #10  
Old July 12th 05, 01:50 AM
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I used to deliver freight into OAK at 0100 every morning, so I know what you
are talking about with regard to HWD.

I never related MSA to anything other than emergency use. I see far too many
posts in the ngs where the pilot is trying to include the MSA in the
procedure, and it has no place in the procedure. YMMV.

Bob

"G. Sylvester" wrote in message
.. .
Bob Gardner wrote:
Never descend until you feel comfortable about your location. You can
always ask for delay vectors or just plain ask to stay (relatively) high
until you feel comfortable. Just because ATC says "Descend and
maintain...." does not mean that you have to obey without question.


I asked my CFI about descending when cleared for an approach. He said
exactly what you said. Calculate your 500 fpm descent to arrive at
the crossing altitude a few miles before you reach the fix. I did this
on my checkride and got a compliment over it from the DE. He said he's
used to students descending immediately even though they could be far
far away from the fix. I gotta thank my friend Mark who flies for UA
as he gave me a good way of briefing for this using the MSA.

Use this sparingly, however, lest you be vectored 20 miles away while
everyone else shoots the approach.
Bob Gardner


especially considering it was into HWD which is right underneath and
overlapping the approach paths for OAK.

Gerald



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS approach question Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 08 03:54 AM
Video of VOR A approach into MBO in actual A Lieberman Instrument Flight Rules 1 May 2nd 05 03:35 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? S. Ramirez Instrument Flight Rules 17 April 2nd 04 11:13 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.