![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
During the late 70s the first Space Shuttle did glide tests after being
launched from the Boeing 747 Shuttle Transporter. Does anybody know how the Shuttle was released from the back of the 747. Did the 747 have to (unbelievably!) roll inverted for the release, or did it pitch down to an extreme attitude or was there some other method? At what altitude was the glide tests commenced? cheers Gordon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message ... During the late 70s the first Space Shuttle did glide tests after being launched from the Boeing 747 Shuttle Transporter. Does anybody know how the Shuttle was released from the back of the 747. Did the 747 have to (unbelievably!) roll inverted for the release, or did it pitch down to an extreme attitude or was there some other method? At what altitude was the glide tests commenced? cheers Gordon They did a pitch over maneuver at 40,000' plus. Basically low G push over, fire off the explosive bolts to release, 747 turn left while the shuttle went straight... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:55:47 GMT, "Jim"
wrote: During the late 70s the first Space Shuttle did glide tests after being launched from the Boeing 747 Shuttle Transporter. Does anybody know how the Shuttle was released from the back of the 747. Did the 747 have to (unbelievably!) roll inverted for the release, or did it pitch down to an extreme attitude or was there some other method? At what altitude was the glide tests commenced? cheers Gordon The shuttle on top, at the positive angle of attack it was mounted, contributed a significant amount of lift to the combined 747-Enterprise configuration. The shuttle essentially "dropped" the 747. In other words, the 747 was flying along normally and when the shuttle released it, it went down because of the loss of lift and then made a turn away from the shuttle. And, again, just from memory, the altitude was much lower than 40,000 feet. More like the upper 20s or very low 30s. Mike Weller |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This should answer your question nicely:
http://www1.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Ph...m/ECN-8923.jpg Tim "Jim" wrote in message ... During the late 70s the first Space Shuttle did glide tests after being launched from the Boeing 747 Shuttle Transporter. Does anybody know how the Shuttle was released from the back of the 747. Did the 747 have to (unbelievably!) roll inverted for the release, or did it pitch down to an extreme attitude or was there some other method? At what altitude was the glide tests commenced? cheers Gordon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " Blueskies" wrote in message m... "Jim" wrote in message ... During the late 70s the first Space Shuttle did glide tests after being launched from the Boeing 747 Shuttle Transporter. Does anybody know how the Shuttle was released from the back of the 747. Did the 747 have to (unbelievably!) roll inverted for the release, or did it pitch down to an extreme attitude or was there some other method? At what altitude was the glide tests commenced? cheers Gordon They did a pitch over maneuver at 40,000' plus. Basically low G push over, fire off the explosive bolts to release, 747 turn left while the shuttle went straight... Correction... Not 40,000', but between 19,000 and 24,700... from http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/n...-015-DFRC.html "The five free flights, which began Aug. 12, 1977, and continued through Oct. 26, 1977, verified the orbiter's approach and landing capabilities and demonstrated its subsonic airworthiness. During each of the free flights, the Enterprise was released at an altitude of between 19,000 and 24,700 feet from the attach struts of the SCA and was flown, powerless, to a landing. Validated were not only the approach and landing capabilities of the vehicle, but also the automatic flight control and navigation systems - prerequisites for orbital flights." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " Blueskies" wrote in message news:he% Correction... Not 40,000', but between 19,000 and 24,700... Yes, I was just about to comment when you clarified. Those early 747s only went to the low to mid 40s when light in normal ops..... don't think it could be managed with the piggy-back. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" Blueskies" wrote in
: Snipola the Enterprise was released at an altitude of between 19,000 and 24,700 feet from the attach struts of the SCA and was flown, powerless, to a landing. "powerless"? As opposed to what? A powered landing? I know they probably mean as a glider, powerless as in no engines. But why make that distinction when it's the ONLY way the Shuttle comes in for a landing? Like they're gonna light the OMS engines and declare a go-around? Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Hubble plug to be pulled | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 33 | March 19th 04 04:19 AM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
763 Cruising Speed. | [email protected] | General Aviation | 24 | February 9th 04 09:30 PM |
Cause of Columbia Shuttle Disaster. | Mike Spera | Owning | 2 | August 31st 03 03:11 PM |