![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In two words, don't bother.
Flew today Anacortes (north of Seattle) back home to Palo Alto, IFR at FL190. The flight plan was pretty complicated, over a dozen waypoints all carefully entered into my shiny new 530 during climb out. And guess what... I got to fly to exactly one of them. Initially I was vectored, then given direct to one of them, then I asked direct for the last one in Seattle's airspace, and they gave me direct Palo Alto. Very nice of them, and I did appreciate it. But it made all that twiddling pretty pointless. Oakland, when they got hold of me, soon gave me a different routing - but easy, Point Reyes and the PYE1 approach to PAO. Next time, I don't think I'll bother! (Norcal however was a different story. Has ANYBODY been handled by Norcal lately without being forgotten about? They failed to give me a handover, then of course when I finally queried it and they DID hand me over, to an irate controller on another sector who wanted to know where I'd been and why I'd ignored his traffic calls. Sigh.) John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Harper wrote:
... The flight plan was pretty complicated, over a dozen waypoints all carefully entered into my shiny new 530 during climb out. And guess what... I got to fly to exactly one of them.... Last, current and next waypoints are usually all you need. GPS box peddlers sell features like 500 routes of sixty waypoints like PBX sellers peddle their list of over a hundred featurs of which our advanced switching design staff used call forwarding, waiting and sometimes, transfer... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Harper" wrote: In two words, don't bother. Flew today Anacortes (north of Seattle) back home to Palo Alto, IFR at FL190. The flight plan was pretty complicated, over a dozen waypoints all carefully entered into my shiny new 530 during climb out. Are you talking about a flight plan or a clearance? Wouldn't you enter a flight plan on the ground? And guess what... I got to fly to exactly one of them. Initially I was vectored, then given direct to one of them, then I asked direct for the last one in Seattle's airspace, and they gave me direct Palo Alto. Very nice of them, and I did appreciate it. But it made all that twiddling pretty pointless. I agree about entering a compex flight plan that you've never flown before - most likely your clearance and route will be different. When I'm given a multipoint clearance from ATC though, I always load it in the GPS. In the (unlikely, I admit) event that I lose com in IMC and have to fly my original clearance, it's right there for me. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not a big deal. You need the flight plan in case of lost comm, so you have
to enter it. If they give you direct to some place on the plan just bring up the Flight Plan page, select the item, and press direct. This will leave the rest of flight plan alone. It happens to me all of the time. jerry " |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" c172rgATbellsouthDOTnet wrote in message ...
"John Harper" wrote: In two words, don't bother. Flew today Anacortes (north of Seattle) back home to Palo Alto, IFR at FL190. The flight plan was pretty complicated, over a dozen waypoints all carefully entered into my shiny new 530 during climb out. Are you talking about a flight plan or a clearance? Wouldn't you enter a flight plan on the ground? And guess what... I got to fly to exactly one of them. Initially I was vectored, then given direct to one of them, then I asked direct for the last one in Seattle's airspace, and they gave me direct Palo Alto. Very nice of them, and I did appreciate it. But it made all that twiddling pretty pointless. I agree about entering a compex flight plan that you've never flown before - most likely your clearance and route will be different. When I'm given a multipoint clearance from ATC though, I always load it in the GPS. In the (unlikely, I admit) event that I lose com in IMC and have to fly my original clearance, it's right there for me. look at it as a 'proficiency exercise' for the 530. i know that's how i learned the kln-89b. had flown apollo gps's, bought a twin that had the '89b already installed/ifr cert'd. i had heard that they had a really crummy u/i, but i didn't find it so bad. my first long x/c was from texas to boston, and from lyh to owd i had my clearance changed 8 times. by the time i got to owd, i was pretty 'seasoned' at entering flight plans in the '89b. :-) g_a |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 0 | June 18th 04 03:21 AM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 03:09 AM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |