![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the US, vasis provides a maximum of 4 ** nautical miles ** obstacle
protection and papi provides 4 ** statute miles ** of protection. True or False Stan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-12-27, Roy Smith wrote:
In article , wrote: In the US, vasis provides a maximum of 4 ** nautical miles ** obstacle protection and papi provides 4 ** statute miles ** of protection. This is the kind of question that gives FAA knowledge tests a bad name. I don't think it's *on* the written because I've never heard that before. I didn't even realize that a vasi/papi had a specific clearance requirement. What about private airports that just throw up a few boards? -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben Jackson wrote:
On 2005-12-27, Roy Smith wrote: In article , wrote: In the US, vasis provides a maximum of 4 ** nautical miles ** obstacle protection and papi provides 4 ** statute miles ** of protection. This is the kind of question that gives FAA knowledge tests a bad name. I don't think it's *on* the written because I've never heard that before. I didn't even realize that a vasi/papi had a specific clearance requirement. What about private airports that just throw up a few boards? They had better not "throw up a few boards" in disregard of FAA airport standards. If they do, it might be some hungry attornies coming after them someday, rather than the FAA. Here is what the AIM says: 2-1-2. Visual Glideslope Indicators a. Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) 1. The VASI is a system of lights so arranged to provide visual descent guidance information during the approach to a runway. These lights are visible from 3-5 miles during the day and up to 20 miles or more at night. The visual glide path of the VASI provides safe obstruction clearance within plus or minus 10 degrees of the extended runway centerline and to 4 NM from the runway threshold. Descent, using the VASI, should not be initiated until the aircraft is visually aligned with the runway. Lateral course guidance is provided by the runway or runway lights. What the AIM misses is that PAPIs are good to 4 statute miles because of a different Airports advisory circular for airport owners. I doubt the 1/2 mile difference would ever be critical. What is critical is to check the AFD to make certain that a VASI or PAPI is not further restricted. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... In the US, vasis provides a maximum of 4 ** nautical miles ** obstacle protection and papi provides 4 ** statute miles ** of protection. True or False False |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message ... In the US, vasis provides a maximum of 4 ** nautical miles ** obstacle protection and papi provides 4 ** statute miles ** of protection. True or False False Check alt.binaries.pictures.aviation for a PDF I just uploaded, which shows that VASI extends to 4 n.m. and PAPI to 4 s.m. Note the fax date on the order, which was sent to me by the FAA in early 2004. This order was in effect for at least 23 years. The best I can determine, this order quietly disappeared sometime in mid-2004, making the siting for any *new* PAPI installations 4 nautical miles, the same as VASI. So, any PAPIs installed since mid-2004 are, or should be, 4 n.m. The vast majority, however, have not been resurveyed (a airport authority, not FAA, responsibility). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Tim. Helpful as always
Stan Check alt.binaries.pictures.aviation for a PDF I just uploaded, which shows that VASI extends to 4 n.m. and PAPI to 4 s.m. Note the fax date on the order, which was sent to me by the FAA in early 2004. This order was in effect for at least 23 years. The best I can determine, this order quietly disappeared sometime in mid-2004, making the siting for any *new* PAPI installations 4 nautical miles, the same as VASI. So, any PAPIs installed since mid-2004 are, or should be, 4 n.m. The vast majority, however, have not been resurveyed (a airport authority, not FAA, responsibility). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |