![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Australia is changing/rearranging its' airspace model to more closely
line-up with ICAO and also to be a _very_ close copy of the current USA system. Basically there will be a heck of a lot of class-E. (usually bottomed at FL180, but in some areas down to A085). Our radar coverage won't change much beyond the current (roughly) 200nm band along the east and south coasts. One of the new procedures is called 'VFR on top', whereby an IFR aircraft can go into VMC at VFR levels and still receive traffic advisories (but no seperation) from IFR or observed VFR traffic. As I see it, the procedure seems odd to me, because the requesting IFR aircraft loses the safety of being seperated by ATC. So my questions are ; Is 'VFR on top' used a lot in the USA ? In the rest of the world ? What practical advantages are there from a pilots' POV ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|