Non-radar transponder codes

I am planning a trip into the Caribbean. My question is: If I have
been given a clearance from a non-radar facility. Because the
facility does not have radar they do not give me a transponder code.
What should I squawk? The same question applies to coming into a
radar-controlled environment from a non-radar environment like
approaching San Juan from Bermuda. Again, what should I squawk prior
to receiving a transponder code from San Juan? I was thinking that
the answer would be 1200 but the AIM says that 1200 is for VFR traffic
in the United States. Should you know the answer, I would also like
to know from where I can find the answer.

Thanks for the help ... Michael

In a previous article, (Michael) said:
to receiving a transponder code from San Juan? I was thinking that
the answer would be 1200 but the AIM says that 1200 is for VFR traffic
in the United States. Should you know the answer, I would also like
to know from where I can find the answer.

Oh no, not again.

Michael, there was a huge and long lasting flame war on this very subject
in this newsgroup. Suffice it to say, this is an extremely gray area -
nowhere does it say specifically what you should do, in either the FARs,
the AIM, or even in the ATC regs that controllers all assume we pilots
know that we've never actually even heard of until they're mentioned in
this group. The regulations *do* specifically say that you should use
1200 when VFR if you haven't been assigned a discrete code. In my
opinion, the regs don't say that's the *only* time you squawk 1200, but
that's where most of the contraversy comes from - a lot of people
vehemently disagree with that interpretation.

Other countries have specific codes for uncontrolled IFR spelled out
specifically in their regs. Lucky them.

--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Sometimes, when a luser makes an unreasonable demand, the best thing
to do is let them have exactly what they ask for.
-- Joe Zeff

"Michael" wrote in message
om...

I am planning a trip into the Caribbean. My question is: If I have
been given a clearance from a non-radar facility. Because the
facility does not have radar they do not give me a transponder code.
What should I squawk? The same question applies to coming into a
radar-controlled environment from a non-radar environment like
approaching San Juan from Bermuda. Again, what should I squawk prior
to receiving a transponder code from San Juan? I was thinking that
the answer would be 1200 but the AIM says that 1200 is for VFR traffic
in the United States. Should you know the answer, I would also like
to know from where I can find the answer.


If you're departing from a point in the US you should be assigned a beacon
code, even if your departure point is not served by radar. Beacon codes are
generated by ARTCC computer based on the equipment suffix you filed. If the
suffix indicates you have a transponder, a code is generated. If the suffix
indicates you do not have a transponder, or no suffix is entered at all, no
code is generated.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Michael" wrote in message
om...

I am planning a trip into the Caribbean. My question is: If I have
been given a clearance from a non-radar facility. Because the
facility does not have radar they do not give me a transponder code.
What should I squawk? The same question applies to coming into a
radar-controlled environment from a non-radar environment like
approaching San Juan from Bermuda. Again, what should I squawk prior
to receiving a transponder code from San Juan? I was thinking that
the answer would be 1200 but the AIM says that 1200 is for VFR traffic
in the United States. Should you know the answer, I would also like
to know from where I can find the answer.


If you're departing from a point in the US you should be assigned a beacon
code, even if your departure point is not served by radar. Beacon codes are
generated by ARTCC computer based on the equipment suffix you filed. If the
suffix indicates you have a transponder, a code is generated. If the suffix
indicates you do not have a transponder, or no suffix is entered at all, no
code is generated.

And, once you depart domestic FAA control and are handed off to oceanic you are
expected to squawk 2000. That is an ICAO rule.

In article , wrote:
And, once you depart domestic FAA control and are handed off to oceanic you
are expected to squawk 2000. That is an ICAO rule.

If you're out of radar coverage, why does anybody care what you squawk?

TCAS?

"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
In article , wrote:
And, once you depart domestic FAA control and are handed off to oceanic
you
are expected to squawk 2000. That is an ICAO rule.

If you're out of radar coverage, why does anybody care what you squawk?

"Brad Z" wrote in message
news:XkwVb.254738$na.416430@attbi_s04...

TCAS?


How does the beacon code affect TCAS performance?

"Roy Smith" wrote...

If you're out of radar coverage, why does anybody care what you squawk?

While you may be out of range of ATC radar, "Big Brother" may be watching with
even bigger radars (e.g., Shemya)...

The answer is: "2000" -- at least for oceanic operations.

I just ran across AC 91-70B -- Oceanic Operations, dated 09/06/94, at
http://www1.faa.gov/fsdo/orl/files/advcir/AC9170B.TXT.

Chapter 2, OCEANIC OPERATIONS FOR ALL AIRCRAFT IN ALL GEOGRAPHIC AREAS, par
6.e(4) states:

(4) ICAO Documents 7030, "Regional Supplementary Procedures"
and 8168, "Aircraft Operations Volume I," state that
transponders shall be operated as follows:

(a) when the aircraft carries serviceable Mode C
equipment, the pilot shall continuously operate in
this mode, unless otherwise directed by ATC;

(b) in NAT airspace, unless otherwise directed by ATC,
pilots shall retain the previously assigned
transponder code for a period of 30 minutes after
entry into the airspace, then operate on code 2000;

(c) in oceanic airspace other than the NAT, pilots shall
operate the transponder and select modes and codes as
directed by the ATC unit with which the pilot is in
contact; or

(d) in the absence of any ATC directions, pilots shall
operate the transponder on Mode A Code 2000.


Further, in Chapter 3, par 9.g, discussing non MNPS airspace over the Atlantic:

Navigation equipment adequate for operation in accordance
with the flight plan and with ATC clearances shall be
carried. SSR transponders with Mode 3/A and C are required in
Iceland. Pilots shall operate SSR transponders continuously
on Mode A, Code 2000. Departing aircraft shall retain the
last assigned code for 30 minutes after entry into NAT
oceanic airspace unless otherwise instructed by ATC. This
procedure does not affect the use of special purpose codes
7500, 7600 or 7700 when required.


Chapter 4, par. 4.g (Northern Pacific ops):

g. Transponder Codes. When operating west of l64E, transponders
should be set to Mode A Code 2000. When east of 164E, a
discrete code may be assigned. This code should be maintained
unless otherwise advised by ATC. If no discrete code is
assigned, transponders should be set to Code 2000.


Chapter 11, GENERAL AVIATION SHORT-RANGE AIRCRAFT OCEANIC OPERATIONS, par. 2.j,
says this about transiting Iceland:

Navigation equipment adequate to navigate in accordance with
the flight plan and in accordance with ATC clearances will be
carried aboard the aircraft. Secondary surveillance radar
(SSR) transponders with Mode 3/A and C are required in
Iceland. Pilots shall operate SSR transponders continuously
on Mode A, Code 2000, except that departing aircraft shall
retain the last assigned code for 30 minutes after entry into
NAT oceanic airspace unless otherwise instructed by ATC.

Exactly...someone is usually watching somewhere regardless of where you
are.

I used to laugh in the 80's & early 90's when I was flying over Cuba on
a regular basis. Havana would always tell me that radar service was
terminated and then require verbal position reports while we all knew
they were tracking us closely on their radar. Now that things are
"friendlier" with them, we are always in radar contact....amazing....

"Radar service terminated" doesn't mean someone...somewhere...isn't
watching.

BJ

John R Weiss wrote:

"Roy Smith" wrote...


If you're out of radar coverage, why does anybody care what you squawk?



While you may be out of range of ATC radar, "Big Brother" may be watching with
even bigger radars (e.g., Shemya)...