![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the rule of thumb to reduce the L/D when plotting a cross country
flight? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Half.
Slick wrote: What is the rule of thumb to reduce the L/D when plotting a cross country flight? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With experience you can evaluate the conditions of the day and adjust
accordingly. If winds are light and lift is good you can use 2000ft margin to arrive at the next landable location. Even on a good day I use 85% of the L/D plus a safety margin. If you examine the flights of experienced pilots they at time appear to take much larger risks but it is because they can judge the conditions and anticipate changes that they are able to do this successfully. Be careful at first as you can get into trouble fast especially on days where the wind is blowing. wrote: Half. Slick wrote: What is the rule of thumb to reduce the L/D when plotting a cross country flight? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1/2 the planned L/d
BT "Slick" wrote in message ... What is the rule of thumb to reduce the L/D when plotting a cross country flight? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slick wrote:
What is the rule of thumb to reduce the L/D when plotting a cross country flight? My experience with gliders ranging from a Ka-6e to an ASH 26 E is a McCready setting of 4 on the glide calculator gives me a very high probablity of making it to my selected landing place (usually an airport). I don't set the speed-to-fly at 4, but at 2 or less, depending on the conditions. My arrival height setting is 1000 feet agl. In areas with poor landing possibilities, like a glide over a forest, lake, and other unlandable areas, I'll increase the MC setting to 5, perhaps even 6. If wave is about, it can be a real guessing game, and I'll generally use even higher settings. A setting of 4 is about 60% of maximum L/D. Be sure your planning allows for the usual winds. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use 2 different calculations:
- Safety to reach a landable field: Typically 1/2, plus or minus according to the wind - Realistic transition (where a miss wouldn't be dangerous): 2/3 Jean "Slick" a écrit dans le message de news: ... What is the rule of thumb to reduce the L/D when plotting a cross country flight? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
rule of thumb: take off distance and weight | [email protected] | Piloting | 2 | March 27th 05 10:54 AM |
FAA Mandatory Pilot Retirement Rule Challenged | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | March 20th 05 08:56 PM |
F/A-18 approach speed rule of thumb | tscottme | Naval Aviation | 5 | December 6th 04 11:13 PM |
Wind rule of thumb? | Bart | Rotorcraft | 3 | April 29th 04 02:18 PM |