![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeppesen plans to cancel their US RNAV Enroute Charts next year.
I've used those charts for nearly thirty years, and I'll miss them a = lot. They are usable at all altitudes, they aren't cluttered with airways, and they are scaled at 20 nm and 30 nm per inch, which I greatly prefer for my cockpit use instead of the bulky Low Altitude Charts. One very useful feature of the RNAV charts, missing from other charts, is the degree/minute markings along their edges, for transferring long, direct-to legs from the planning chart to the RNAV charts. Is anyone else so disappointed about losing those charts as I am? ---JRC--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enroute charts valid for use in Canada? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | June 3rd 04 06:34 PM |
Can US enroute charts be used in Canada? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | May 31st 04 09:58 PM |
RNAV approaches | Kevin Chandler | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | September 18th 03 06:00 PM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |