![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....it's hard to see through, and good ol' Gulf Coast home boys like me should
not mess around with it. Christmas Eve I was flying my daughter and grandson to Houston to visit my mom for the holiday. We'd spent the previous day in a little town NE of Houston. It was only about a 45 nm flight from 6R3 to Houston Hobby and good VFR was reported and forecast, so I didn't file IFR. There was a mention of -SN in the Hobby TAF, but heck, the ceiling was 7,000 and the vis. was 10, so no worries, right? Houston Approach cleared me into the Bravo and vectored me down the east side of the county at 2,000', clear of the approaches into IAH. Over that stretch I talked to four different TRACON frequencies. Southeast of Hobby, the last controller for some reason had me climb from 2,000 to 2,200, saying "advise if unable." Hmm. Shortly thereafter, the vis. started to fall as he vectored me west to put me south of Hobby, and I had to request lower to maintain VFR. It was snowing. Another vector to the north headed us directly towards Hobby and now the low-vis. was rapidly becoming no-vis. As I descended to 1,500' to try to maintain VFR, I could see the ground fine below us but I had serious doubts that I was still legally in VMC. The controller had already instructed me to report the airport in sight, and now he called back, sounding a little exasperated saying, "Cessna '87Delta, airport 12 o'clock, 3 miles." Big ol' Hobby Airport, and I couldn't see it. Just as I hit the PTT to 'fess up and ask for a local IFR clearance, the airport appeared, almost under my right wing. I was in good shape for long right base to RWY 4, which is what I had been expecting, and I told the controller I had the airport. He handed me to the tower and the landing was uneventful. I'm pretty mad at myself for letting this situation go as far as it did. What fooled me most, I think, was the fact that I had been watching regional METARs all day reporting -SN but still having vis. of 10 miles. A little snow? No problem! This is Houston, not Minneapolis--how bad could it get? Pretty bad, actually: the area south of Hobby was having much heavier snowfall and it quickly knocked the vis. down to very marginal VMC at best. Angleton, south of Houston, got 7 inches of snow that evening. So I've learned some more lessons, I hope: 1) Do not be optimistic about conditions involving precip., no matter what the forecast says. 2) When things start going sour, make a new plan RIGHT NOW and tell the controller what you need, don't passively follow vectors. 3) And (bringing back my old personal rule) *always* file IFR cross country unless there is a very good reason not to. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
... ...it's hard to see through, and good ol' Gulf Coast home boys like me should not mess around with it. Edifying story, Dan! Glad it worked out. Southeast of Hobby, the last controller for some reason had me climb from 2,000 to 2,200, saying "advise if unable." Hmm. Shortly thereafter, the vis. started to fall as he vectored me west to put me south of Hobby, and I had to request lower to maintain VFR. It was snowing. I'm a little unclear as to how descending could improve your visibility in snowfall. I see how you could get a better view of the ground, but the VFR/IFR distinction is primarily for aircraft separation rather than navigation, and is thus defined in terms of flight visibility, not ground visibility. I too have encountered worse-than-forecast visibility, to the point of finding IMC in place of expected good VMC. It's not just a problem with snow or other precipitation. (Once, it was a matter of smoke from forest fires in Canada descending through the lower atmosphere in the vicinity of New York City!) I don't always file IFR for XCs, but I do make sure to have a backup plan in case of any remotely-plausible IMC. --Gary |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary Drescher" wrote: I'm a little unclear as to how descending could improve your visibility in snowfall. IOW, I couldn't think of anything else to do. ![]() At least I could see the ground underneath me! -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What reason did you give the controller for your descent? If it was to
maintain VFR, he shouldn't have been surprised that you could not see the airport. I can never read too many stories like yours--thanks for posting. Glad you had the IR giving you the IFR pop-up in your back pocket. Marco Leon "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... "Gary Drescher" wrote: I'm a little unclear as to how descending could improve your visibility in snowfall. IOW, I couldn't think of anything else to do. ![]() At least I could see the ground underneath me! -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thank you for sharing your experience! Who along the Gulf Coast expects they'll ever fly through snow? "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... ...it's hard to see through, and good ol' Gulf Coast home boys like me should not mess around with it. Christmas Eve I was flying my daughter and grandson to Houston to visit my mom for the holiday. We'd spent the previous day in a little town NE of Houston. It was only about a 45 nm flight from 6R3 to Houston Hobby and good VFR was reported and forecast, so I didn't file IFR. There was a mention of -SN in the Hobby TAF, but heck, the ceiling was 7,000 and the vis. was 10, so no worries, right? Houston Approach cleared me into the Bravo and vectored me down the east side of the county at 2,000', clear of the approaches into IAH. Over that stretch I talked to four different TRACON frequencies. Southeast of Hobby, the last controller for some reason had me climb from 2,000 to 2,200, saying "advise if unable." Hmm. Shortly thereafter, the vis. started to fall as he vectored me west to put me south of Hobby, and I had to request lower to maintain VFR. It was snowing. Another vector to the north headed us directly towards Hobby and now the low-vis. was rapidly becoming no-vis. As I descended to 1,500' to try to maintain VFR, I could see the ground fine below us but I had serious doubts that I was still legally in VMC. The controller had already instructed me to report the airport in sight, and now he called back, sounding a little exasperated saying, "Cessna '87Delta, airport 12 o'clock, 3 miles." Big ol' Hobby Airport, and I couldn't see it. Just as I hit the PTT to 'fess up and ask for a local IFR clearance, the airport appeared, almost under my right wing. I was in good shape for long right base to RWY 4, which is what I had been expecting, and I told the controller I had the airport. He handed me to the tower and the landing was uneventful. I'm pretty mad at myself for letting this situation go as far as it did. What fooled me most, I think, was the fact that I had been watching regional METARs all day reporting -SN but still having vis. of 10 miles. A little snow? No problem! This is Houston, not Minneapolis--how bad could it get? Pretty bad, actually: the area south of Hobby was having much heavier snowfall and it quickly knocked the vis. down to very marginal VMC at best. Angleton, south of Houston, got 7 inches of snow that evening. So I've learned some more lessons, I hope: 1) Do not be optimistic about conditions involving precip., no matter what the forecast says. 2) When things start going sour, make a new plan RIGHT NOW and tell the controller what you need, don't passively follow vectors. 3) And (bringing back my old personal rule) *always* file IFR cross country unless there is a very good reason not to. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marco Leon" wrote: What reason did you give the controller for your descent? If it was to maintain VFR, he shouldn't have been surprised that you could not see the airport. I told him it was to maintain VFR. I think he must have suspected that conditions were deteriorating, based on his "if able" statement earlier when he told me to climb to 2,200'. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
Weight of snow on wings | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 10 | January 4th 04 10:58 PM |
will this fly? | Lee Elson | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | December 15th 03 04:03 AM |
snow and icing | Teacherjh | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | December 10th 03 04:00 AM |
Great Lakes lake effect snow | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | October 21st 03 05:15 PM |