![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got my IR last August and finally got to log my 1st post-checkride actual
approach. All while the airport I was landing at was reporting 10 miles and clear below 12,000. More like 1,200. All day long this place was reporting clear skies. All day long it varied between 1,200 and 1,700. ATC read me the AWOS before I heard it and we were planning a decent to MSA then a visual landing. The bases were only about 700-800 below me, but I just couldn't keep visual. I ended up flying a full procedure turn LOC approach. Bah. Just enough to keep my in the clouds until descending past the FAF. (and yes, i will be logging that approach g) Lesson learned? Be prepared. I had already loaded the approach into the GPS just in case, & had everything ready for it. Also, I'll believe reported weather when I'm actually in it. Third lesson? Be very familiar with the equipment in your plane. I was flying a Diamond Star I was recently checked out it. We had gone through auto pilot usage, and I used it for most of the flight, but when it was time to make the procedure turn, the plane wasn't turning. I didn't have something set. I think I forgot to switch the 530 from GPS mode to VLOC once I activated the approach. Shoot I can't remember if I even hit APR on the autopilot now that I think of it. I ended up hand flying the approach. Cool experience. Very rare to get such benign IMC to learn in. -- PP-ASEL, instrument |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven Barnes" wrote in message m... I got my IR last August and finally got to log my 1st post-checkride actual approach. All while the airport I was landing at was reporting 10 miles and clear below 12,000. More like 1,200. All day long this place was reporting clear skies. All day long it varied between 1,200 and 1,700. ATC read me the AWOS before I heard it and we were planning a decent to MSA then a visual landing. The bases were only about 700-800 below me, but I just couldn't keep visual. I ended up flying a full procedure turn LOC approach. Bah. Just enough to keep my in the clouds until descending past the FAF. (and yes, i will be logging that approach g) Lesson learned? Be prepared. I had already loaded the approach into the GPS just in case, & had everything ready for it. Also, I'll believe reported weather when I'm actually in it. Third lesson? Be very familiar with the equipment in your plane. I was flying a Diamond Star I was recently checked out it. We had gone through auto pilot usage, and I used it for most of the flight, but when it was time to make the procedure turn, the plane wasn't turning. I didn't have something set. I think I forgot to switch the 530 from GPS mode to VLOC once I activated the approach. Shoot I can't remember if I even hit APR on the autopilot now that I think of it. I ended up hand flying the approach. Cool experience. Very rare to get such benign IMC to learn in. What field? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven Barnes" wrote:
I got my IR last August and finally got to log my 1st post-checkride actual approach. All while the airport I was landing at was reporting 10 miles and clear below 12,000. More like 1,200. All day long this place was reporting clear skies. All day long it varied between 1,200 and 1,700. Yeah, it happens. Nothing, but nothing, beats a set of human eyeballs in the location right now to report what the weather is doing. I've had ATC try to sell me a visual when I'm looking at a solid cloud layer below me. He's sitting in a room with no windows looking at a computer readout of some automated system, but I'm looking at clouds. Who should you believe? ATC read me the AWOS before I heard it and we were planning a decent to MSA then a visual landing. The bases were only about 700-800 below me, but I just couldn't keep visual. I ended up flying a full procedure turn LOC approach. Bah. Just enough to keep my in the clouds until descending past the FAF. (and yes, i will be logging that approach g) After you landed, did you give ATC or FSS a pirep? It would have helped the next guy out. Wouldn't it be nice to be the next guy listening to the AWOS from 30 miles out and have ATC tell you, "I've got a pirep from 10 minutes ago of 1200 overcast"? Third lesson? Be very familiar with the equipment in your plane. I was flying a Diamond Star I was recently checked out it. We had gone through auto pilot usage, and I used it for most of the flight, but when it was time to make the procedure turn, the plane wasn't turning. I didn't have something set. I think I forgot to switch the 530 from GPS mode to VLOC once I activated the approach. Shoot I can't remember if I even hit APR on the autopilot now that I think of it. I ended up hand flying the approach. Most instructors (I'm guilty of this too) try to keep their students from using "crutches" like GPS and autopilots. The idea is we want to make sure the basic skills get learned. Unfortunately, this often results in students not knowing how to use these very useful systems to their best advantage. Setting up for an approach in IMC is no time to be trying to figure out how the autopilot works. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... Yeah, it happens. Nothing, but nothing, beats a set of human eyeballs in the location right now to report what the weather is doing. I've had ATC try to sell me a visual when I'm looking at a solid cloud layer below me. He's sitting in a room with no windows looking at a computer readout of some automated system, but I'm looking at clouds. Who should you believe? You should believe your eyes. But you should also understand that it generally isn't a choice between a set of human eyeballs in the location right now to report what the weather is doing and an AWOS, it's a choice between an AWOS and nothing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Steven Barnes" wrote in message m... I got my IR last August and finally got to log my 1st post-checkride actual approach. All while the airport I was landing at was reporting 10 miles and clear below 12,000. More like 1,200. All day long this place was reporting clear skies. All day long it varied between 1,200 and 1,700. [snip] What field? Effingham, IL 1H2 Usually they're pretty good with the AWOS. I didn't get the chance to file a Pirep, but ATC found out about the clouds thru me. Although that doesn't help the guy planning a flight. 20 miles to the north west it was perfectly clear. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven Barnes" wrote in
m: I got my IR last August and finally got to log my 1st post-checkride actual approach. All while the airport I was landing at was reporting 10 miles and clear below 12,000. More like 1,200. All day long this place was reporting clear skies. All day long it varied between 1,200 and 1,700. I've also seen the ASOS reporting fog, low visibility and low ceilings, and had the airport in sight 30 miles out, and no problems all the way in. Automated systems do lie sometimes, but they're better than nothing. -- Regards, Stan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nothing, but nothing, beats a set of human eyeballs
in the location right now to report what the weather is doing. Human eyeballs can't always be trusted, either. Returning home to a non-towered field shortly after dark, I was told by Unicom that the ceiling was 700 feet. But the aircraft just ahead of me reported breaking out at minimums--200 feet. I, too, broke out at 200 feet. The observer was at the terminal, half a mile from the end of the runway. vince norris |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "vincent p. norris" wrote in message ... Human eyeballs can't always be trusted, either. Returning home to a non-towered field shortly after dark, I was told by Unicom that the ceiling was 700 feet. But the aircraft just ahead of me reported breaking out at minimums--200 feet. I, too, broke out at 200 feet. The observer was at the terminal, half a mile from the end of the runway. Was the "observer" a certified weather observer? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
vincent p. norris wrote: Nothing, but nothing, beats a set of human eyeballs in the location right now to report what the weather is doing. Human eyeballs can't always be trusted, either. Returning home to a non-towered field shortly after dark, I was told by Unicom that the ceiling was 700 feet. But the aircraft just ahead of me reported breaking out at minimums--200 feet. I, too, broke out at 200 feet. The observer was at the terminal, half a mile from the end of the runway. vince norris Machines are much better at precise measurements than people. I'm not sure I could tell the difference between 200 OVC and 700 OVC by eye, and I'm sure I couldn't between 1000 and 2000. What humans are much better at is "big picture" observations. No human is going to think it's overcast when it's clear because he got some bird **** in his eye. That's the kind of mistake it takes a machine to make. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most weather ceilings are now determined by machine (a laser
ceilometer), even if it's relayed by a human. The old balloon method that determined ceilings by how long it took for the balloon to enter the clouds is only used these days at those sites that don't have a working ceilometer. JPH vincent p. norris wrote: Nothing, but nothing, beats a set of human eyeballs in the location right now to report what the weather is doing. Human eyeballs can't always be trusted, either. Returning home to a non-towered field shortly after dark, I was told by Unicom that the ceiling was 700 feet. But the aircraft just ahead of me reported breaking out at minimums--200 feet. I, too, broke out at 200 feet. The observer was at the terminal, half a mile from the end of the runway. vince norris |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|