Boeing Flies Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft

The Boeing Company http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/index.html
Boeing Flies Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft

CHICAGO, July 26, 2007 -- The innovative Boeing [NYSE: BA] Blended
Wing Body (BWB) research aircraft -- designated the X-48B -- flew for
the first time last week at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at
Edwards Air Force Base in California.

The 21-foot wingspan, 500-pound unmanned test vehicle took off for the
first time at 8:42 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on July 20 and climbed
to an altitude of 7,500 feet before landing 31 minutes later.

"We've successfully passed another milestone in our work to explore
and validate the structural, aerodynamic and operational efficiencies
of the BWB concept," said Bob Liebeck, BWB program manager for Boeing
Phantom Works, the company's advanced R&D unit. "We already have begun
to compare actual flight-test data with the data generated earlier by
our computer models and in the wind tunnel."

The X-48B flight test vehicle was developed by Boeing Phantom Works in
cooperation with NASA and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory to
gather detailed information about the stability and flight-control
characteristics of the BWB design, especially during takeoffs and
landings. Up to 25 flights are planned to gather data in these
low-speed flight regimes. Following completion of low-speed flight
testing, the X-48B likely will be used to test the BWB's low-noise
characteristics, as well as BWB handling characteristics at transonic
speeds.

Two X-48B research vehicles have been built. The vehicle that flew on
July 20 is Ship 2, which also was used for ground and taxi testing.
Ship 1, a duplicate of Ship 2, completed extensive wind tunnel testing
in 2006 at the Old Dominion University NASA Langley Full-Scale Tunnel
in Virginia. Ship 1 will be available for use as a backup during the
flight test program.

Three turbojet engines enable the composite-skinned research vehicle
to fly up to 10,000 feet and 120 knots in its low-speed configuration.
Modifications would need to be made to the vehicle to enable it to fly
at higher speeds. The unmanned aircraft is remotely piloted from a
ground control station in which the pilot uses conventional aircraft
controls and instrumentation while looking at a monitor fed by a
forward-looking camera on the aircraft.

The Boeing BWB design resembles a flying wing, but differs in that the
wing blends smoothly into a wide, flat, tailless fuselage. This
fuselage blending helps to get additional lift with less drag compared
to a circular fuselage. This translates to reduced fuel use at cruise
conditions. And because the engines mount high on the back of the
aircraft, there is less noise inside and on the ground when it is in
flight.

"While Boeing constantly explores and applies innovative technologies
to enhance its current and next-generation products, the X-48B is a
good example of how Boeing also looks much farther into the future at
revolutionary concepts that promise even greater breakthroughs in
flight," said Bob Krieger, Boeing chief technology officer and
president of Phantom Works.

While a commercial passenger application for the BWB concept is not in
Boeing's current 20-year market outlook, the Advanced Systems
organization of Boeing Integrated Defense Systems' (IDS) is closely
monitoring the research based on the BWB's potential as a flexible,
long-range, high-capacity military aircraft.

"The BWB concept holds tremendous promise for the future of military
aviation as a multi-purpose military platform in 15 to 20 years," said
Darryl Davis, Boeing IDS Advanced Systems vice president and general
manager of Advanced Precision Engagement and Mobility Systems. "Its
unique design attributes will result in less fuel burn and a greatly
reduced noise footprint, which are important capabilities to offer our
Air Force and mobility customers."

NASA's participation in the project is focused on fundamental,
edge-of-the-envelope flight dynamics and structural concepts of the
BWB. Along with hosting the X-48B flight test and research
activities, NASA Dryden provided engineering and technical support --
expertise garnered from years of operating cutting-edge unmanned air
vehicles.

The two X-48B research vehicles were built by Cranfield Aerospace
Ltd., in the United Kingdom, in accordance with Boeing requirements.

###

Photo of the test model:

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._boeing_hi.jpg



--
Dallas

"Dallas" wrote in message
...

Photo of the test model:

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._boeing_hi.jpg

I want one, just like that!

It sure would make a dandy remote control model !!!

Really though, it is interesting. I did not know they were still working on the
concept.

I would fly in one, if you put a viewscreen in front of my seat, linked with
cameras outside to choose from. That is what I had heard they said would be the
arrangement.
--
Jim in NC

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:38:06 GMT, Dallas
wrote in
:


Photo of the test model:

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._boeing_hi.jpg

Nice plan-view. I'd like to see a frontal view as well.

Being that this prototype is flying at Dryden, is Boeing funding this
research? Or are we?

On Jul 26, 6:29 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Dallas" wrote in message

...



Photo of the test model:

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._boeing_hi.jpg

I want one, just like that!

It sure would make a dandy remote control model !!!

Really though, it is interesting. I did not know they were still working on the
concept.

I would fly in one, if you put a viewscreen in front of my seat, linked with
cameras outside to choose from. That is what I had heard they said would be the
arrangement.
--
Jim in NC

I think Boeing would be really smart to pursue this technology. It
will lead to airliners that are much more efficient than the current
layout. If Boeing doesn't do it, you can bet that Airbus or Embraer,
or eventually maybe even the Chinese aircraft manufacturers will.

And I think for the generation growing up today on video games and
computer screens, having a view screen instead of a window won't be a
hardship.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message


Being that this prototype is flying at Dryden, is Boeing funding this
research? Or are we?

I get the impression it's a bit of both. Two things I took particular note
of in the OP a

1) "Along with hosting the X-48B flight test and research
activities, NASA Dryden provided engineering and technical support..."

2) The two X-48B research vehicles were built by Cranfield Aerospace
Ltd., in the United Kingdom, in accordance with Boeing requirements.

If they truly are Boeing requirements, then Boeing is definitely fronting
some money. However, NASA obviously has skin in the game with their
"engineering and technical support".

I found it curious the vehicles were built in the UK. Do Boeing not have the
capacity to build them at home?

--
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer
http://sage1solutions.com/products
NEW! FlyteBalance v2.0 (W&B); FlyteLog v2.0 (Logbook)
____________________

"Morgans" wrote in message


I would fly in one, if you put a viewscreen in front of my seat,
linked with cameras outside to choose from. That is what I had heard
they said would be the arrangement.

What about an LCD screen mimicking a modern airliner window showing the view
to the sides, as well...?

--
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer
http://sage1solutions.com/products
NEW! FlyteBalance v2.0 (W&B); FlyteLog v2.0 (Logbook)
____________________

"Phil" wrote

And I think for the generation growing up today on video games and
computer screens, having a view screen instead of a window won't be a
hardship.

Plus, think of the views that you would never get to see, even with a window
seat. Most of the time, I end up getting a window seat right above the wing,
anyway. Can't see much from there!

A view, as you are looking out the cockpit when landing would be pretty cool, I
think.

Plus you could see the scenery without all of those nose and forehead prints on
the windows, and you would not have to try and look through all of those
scratched up Plexiglas windows.

Yep, give me a viewscreen, with the choice of what camera I want to use.
--
Jim in NC

Recently, Morgans posted:

"Phil" wrote

And I think for the generation growing up today on video games and
computer screens, having a view screen instead of a window won't be a
hardship.

Plus, think of the views that you would never get to see, even with a
window seat. Most of the time, I end up getting a window seat right
above the wing, anyway. Can't see much from there!

A view, as you are looking out the cockpit when landing would be
pretty cool, I think.

Plus you could see the scenery without all of those nose and forehead
prints on the windows, and you would not have to try and look through
all of those scratched up Plexiglas windows.

Yep, give me a viewscreen, with the choice of what camera I want to
use.

A little reality check... Most likely, one would get to choose which dirty
camera lens to "best" view the scenery.

Neil

Phil wrote:
On Jul 26, 6:29 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Dallas" wrote in message

...



Photo of the test model:
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1..._boeing_hi.jpg
I want one, just like that!

It sure would make a dandy remote control model !!!

Really though, it is interesting. I did not know they were still working on the
concept.

I would fly in one, if you put a viewscreen in front of my seat, linked with
cameras outside to choose from. That is what I had heard they said would be the
arrangement.
--
Jim in NC

I think Boeing would be really smart to pursue this technology. It
will lead to airliners that are much more efficient than the current
layout. If Boeing doesn't do it, you can bet that Airbus or Embraer,
or eventually maybe even the Chinese aircraft manufacturers will.

And I think for the generation growing up today on video games and
computer screens, having a view screen instead of a window won't be a
hardship.


That may be true, but my understanding is that all market survey work
done to date has shown consumers to soundly reject an airplane without
windows. However, maybe future generations will have a different view
as you say.

Matt