![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm probably over-thinking holding patterns and have become confused.
When given instructions to hold at a non-published holding pattern, ATC will specify: 1. The direction from the fix, such as north, north-east, etc. 2. The name of the holding fix. 3. The radial, course, or airway on which the aircraft is to hold. 4. The leg length and direction of turns if they are not standard. 5. The expect further clearance time. Here's my question: If I'm told to hold on a radial (as opposed to a course), does that mean that I'm flying away from the station when I'm "on course" in the holding pattern? For example, I'm given the instruction, "Hold south of the VOR on the 180° radial, expect further clearance in 15 minutes." Once I get established in the holding pattern, do I track inbound to the station on the 180° radial or do I track outbound on the 180° radial? How would that be different if I were given the same instructions, except hold on the 180° course (instead of the 180° radial)? Thanks, Dennis |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dennis Johnson" wrote: Here's my question: If I'm told to hold on a radial (as opposed to a course), does that mean that I'm flying away from the station when I'm "on course" in the holding pattern? No. It means that you fly to the fix *on* the radial. IOW you are to be on the radial when inbound to the fix. For example, I'm given the instruction, "Hold south of the VOR on the 180° radial, expect further clearance in 15 minutes." Once I get established in the holding pattern, do I track inbound to the station on the 180° radial or do I track outbound on the 180° radial? Inbound. How would that be different if I were given the same instructions, except hold on the 180° course (instead of the 180° radial)? You won't be given that instruction, at least not by a controller who knows what he's doing. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dennis Johnson wrote:
For example, I'm given the instruction, "Hold south of the VOR on the 180° radial, expect further clearance in 15 minutes." Once I get established in the holding pattern, do I track inbound to the station on the 180° radial or do I track outbound on the 180° radial? Inbound. The fix and radial define the inbound side of a hold. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
"Dennis Johnson" wrote: How would that be different if I were given the same instructions, except hold on the 180° course (instead of the 180° radial)? You won't be given that instruction, at least not by a controller who knows what he's doing. The only context in which "course" might be used, that I can think of, is where you might be cleared to hold on a "final approach course". DB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/24/07 10:42, Dennis Johnson wrote:
I'm probably over-thinking holding patterns and have become confused. When given instructions to hold at a non-published holding pattern, ATC will specify: 1. The direction from the fix, such as north, north-east, etc. 2. The name of the holding fix. 3. The radial, course, or airway on which the aircraft is to hold. 4. The leg length and direction of turns if they are not standard. 5. The expect further clearance time. Here's my question: If I'm told to hold on a radial (as opposed to a course), does that mean that I'm flying away from the station when I'm "on course" in the holding pattern? You always hold at the fix. You are on the holding course when flying to the fix. For example, I'm given the instruction, "Hold south of the VOR on the 180� radial, expect further clearance in 15 minutes." Once I get established in the holding pattern, do I track inbound to the station on the 180� radial or do I track outbound on the 180� radial? You fly toward the fix (the VOR in this case) on the holding radial (180 in this case). If you remember that you always fly to the fix, you won't be able to mix these up. How would that be different if I were given the same instructions, except hold on the 180� course (instead of the 180� radial)? I would ask the controller for a clarification. Have a look at the 7110.65 to see what they will do for holding instructions. Thanks, Dennis -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane, USUA Ultralight Pilot Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have received excellent answers, but that won't keep me from piling
on....when inbound to the fix, you have navigational guidance; on the outbound leg you are using dead reckoning. You never fly outbound with navigational guidance. Bob Gardner "Dennis Johnson" wrote in message . .. I'm probably over-thinking holding patterns and have become confused. When given instructions to hold at a non-published holding pattern, ATC will specify: 1. The direction from the fix, such as north, north-east, etc. 2. The name of the holding fix. 3. The radial, course, or airway on which the aircraft is to hold. 4. The leg length and direction of turns if they are not standard. 5. The expect further clearance time. Here's my question: If I'm told to hold on a radial (as opposed to a course), does that mean that I'm flying away from the station when I'm "on course" in the holding pattern? For example, I'm given the instruction, "Hold south of the VOR on the 180° radial, expect further clearance in 15 minutes." Once I get established in the holding pattern, do I track inbound to the station on the 180° radial or do I track outbound on the 180° radial? How would that be different if I were given the same instructions, except hold on the 180° course (instead of the 180° radial)? Thanks, Dennis |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks so much for the speedy and excellent answers to my question about
holding! I have returned to flying after a decades-long absence and am going to start flying with an instructor tomorrow to prep for the IPC. It's amazing how much I've forgotten. At least this is one mistake I won't make. Thanks, Dennis |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dennis Johnson" wrote in message . .. I'm probably over-thinking holding patterns and have become confused. When given instructions to hold at a non-published holding pattern, ATC will specify: 1. The direction from the fix, such as north, north-east, etc. 2. The name of the holding fix. 3. The radial, course, or airway on which the aircraft is to hold. 4. The leg length and direction of turns if they are not standard. 5. The expect further clearance time. An EFC is not issued if no delay is expected. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Dennis Johnson" wrote in message . .. I'm probably over-thinking holding patterns and have become confused. When given instructions to hold at a non-published holding pattern, ATC will specify: 1. The direction from the fix, such as north, north-east, etc. 2. The name of the holding fix. 3. The radial, course, or airway on which the aircraft is to hold. 4. The leg length and direction of turns if they are not standard. 5. The expect further clearance time. An EFC is not issued if no delay is expected. If no delay is expected, why issue a hold? Matt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:32:00 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote: If no delay is expected, why issue a hold? Because people who write written exams need a reason to ask a question? G |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bose X - $995 and holding... | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | November 30th 05 12:57 AM |
Holding pattern reporting | Yossarian | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | July 4th 05 10:57 AM |
Stupid Newbie Pattern Question | Lakeview Bill | Piloting | 76 | June 11th 05 02:54 PM |
Holding at CHS | Stuart King | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 10th 03 07:52 PM |
Holding Pattern Entries | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | July 11th 03 05:18 AM |