![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My partner and I have decided it is time to upgrade the old 'wing-leveller'
autopilot (Century I) to a real autopilot. We will likely be looking for either 2 or 3 axis (altitude would be nice, but we need to factor in cost) and will couple it to the Garmin 530. AP to be installed in a Beech Sierra So, some questions: What is your favorite AP Thoughts on 2 v 3 axis Features to look for Brands to avoid |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pgbnh,
What is your favorite AP S-TEC. Hard to find more cost-efficient retrofits. The 20/30 (if panel space is an issue, those are completely contained in a turn coordinator) or the 40/50 come to mind. Thoughts on 2 v 3 axis Let's properly define it first: 1 axis is wing levelling including possibly NAV and GPS tracking and possibly intercepts of desired tracks/radials. This mostly includes following localizers in an "approach mode". 2 axis includes altitude hold. 3 axis means an additional yaw damper for some, and altitude preselect and capturing for others. THe latter mostly includes the ability to follow glide slopes. You probably don't want more than 2-axis Features to look for Well, with a 530, you'll want GPSS. That's GPS roll steering and means that the GPS drives the autopilot in a more efficient way than just like a CDI. That will give you turn anticipation and other neat stuff. Also, you'll need to be aware of the difference between rate-based and attitude-based autopilots. Most rate-based APs operate with electric turn coordinators. This means they will continue working when your vacuum system or your AI fail. Which some (myself included) consider an important safety feature. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pgbnh wrote:
My partner and I have decided it is time to upgrade the old 'wing-leveller' autopilot (Century I) to a real autopilot. We will likely be looking for either 2 or 3 axis (altitude would be nice, but we need to factor in cost) and will couple it to the Garmin 530. AP to be installed in a Beech Sierra So, some questions: What is your favorite AP Thoughts on 2 v 3 axis Features to look for Brands to avoid My S-TEC 55X is a blast coupled with the GNS480 autopilot. It's two axis. A reasonably stable airplane doesn't need the third axis, but it is available if you want it. GPSS is a must. Being able to couple the approach is handy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pgbnh" wrote : My partner and I have decided it is time to upgrade the old 'wing-leveller' autopilot (Century I) to a real autopilot. We will likely be looking for either 2 or 3 axis (altitude would be nice, but we need to factor in cost) Few APs are 3-axis (pitch, roll and yaw). and will couple it to the Garmin 530. AP to be installed in a Beech Sierra So, some questions: What is your favorite AP S-Tec Thoughts on 2 v 3 axis I think you mean 1 (roll only) vs. 2 (roll & pitch). Definitely go for 2. Features to look for GPSS, altitude hold. Altitude preselect & glideslope capture cost a lot more but are very nice to have. Brands to avoid The only real choice nowdays is S-Tec. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 27, 12:07 pm, "pgbnh" wrote:
My partner and I have decided it is time to upgrade the old 'wing-leveller' autopilot (Century I) to a real autopilot. We will likely be looking for either 2 or 3 axis (altitude would be nice, but we need to factor in cost) and will couple it to the Garmin 530. AP to be installed in a Beech Sierra So, some questions: What is your favorite AP Thoughts on 2 v 3 axis Features to look for Brands to avoid I have the Stec 30 (roll and pitch with alt hold) and combined with the new Garmin 430W its performance is absolutely awesome. Rock steady, flies complete GPS approaches. You are responsible for altitude changes and glideslope. There's a huge cost difference if you also want it to fly the slope. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can the glideslope tracking be added as an option or does that involve some
tearout and throwaway if you don't purchase the feature during original install? -- Jim Carter Rogers, Arkansas "Paul kgyy" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 27, 12:07 pm, "pgbnh" wrote: My partner and I have decided it is time to upgrade the old 'wing-leveller' autopilot (Century I) to a real autopilot. We will likely be looking for either 2 or 3 axis (altitude would be nice, but we need to factor in cost) and will couple it to the Garmin 530. AP to be installed in a Beech Sierra So, some questions: What is your favorite AP Thoughts on 2 v 3 axis Features to look for Brands to avoid I have the Stec 30 (roll and pitch with alt hold) and combined with the new Garmin 430W its performance is absolutely awesome. Rock steady, flies complete GPS approaches. You are responsible for altitude changes and glideslope. There's a huge cost difference if you also want it to fly the slope. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Carter wrote:
Can the glideslope tracking be added as an option or does that involve some tearout and throwaway if you don't purchase the feature during original install? Not an option for the 30. The 55X will fly both ILS's (LOC & GS) and the WAAS glideslopes. If you were to upgrade, I don't know how much of the original installation is recyclable. You would think that the servos ought to be in common. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chelton EFIS: any PIREPS? | Kai Glaesner | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | December 27th 05 12:56 PM |
Sun N Fun PIREPS? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 16 | April 26th 05 05:27 PM |
Sun N Fun Pireps? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 1 | April 13th 05 02:10 AM |
Pireps on Avionics | Robbie S. | Owning | 19 | March 13th 05 04:26 PM |
PIREPS / airliners | [email protected] | Piloting | 10 | January 21st 05 11:15 PM |