![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you. Then I can understand it.
"fudog50" wrote in message ... It can carry them, sure, for ferrying, but doesn't have the harm control box, or wiring to be able to control or fire it! On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:27:33 GMT, "Tetsuji Rai" wrote: Title says it all. I'm playing a flight simulator, Falcon4. In this game, F15E cannot carry HARM missiles. But I have found a Japanese home page which says an F15E can carry HARM missiles. So I want to know which, and if possible, how many AGM88s it can carry, and which hardpoints are used for AGM88. Thanks in advance!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C Knowles wrote:
I have seen a photo of a F-15E with HARMs on the seldom-used outboard wing stations but it was simply an eval for the Weasel role. Since the F-16 picked up this role it was not proceded with. Just to nitpick, are you sure that wasn't one of the very early TF-15As serving as a Strike Eagle demonstrator? The South Korean F-15K apparently will have the option of carrying HARM; it's part of the weapon package that went with the aircraft. -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Schoene" wrote in message ink.net... C Knowles wrote: I have seen a photo of a F-15E with HARMs on the seldom-used outboard wing stations but it was simply an eval for the Weasel role. Since the F-16 picked up this role it was not proceded with. Just to nitpick, are you sure that wasn't one of the very early TF-15As serving as a Strike Eagle demonstrator? TF-15A? I believe you would be referring to the F-15B. Brooks The South Korean F-15K apparently will have the option of carrying HARM; it's part of the weapon package that went with the aircraft. -- Tom Schoene |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"B2431" wrote:
From: "Kevin Brooks" "Thomas Schoene" wrote in message link.net... C Knowles wrote: I have seen a photo of a F-15E with HARMs on the seldom-used outboard wing stations but it was simply an eval for the Weasel role. Since the F-16 picked up this role it was not proceded with. Just to nitpick, are you sure that wasn't one of the very early TF-15As serving as a Strike Eagle demonstrator? TF-15A? I believe you would be referring to the F-15B. Brooks The first few 2 seater F-15s were disignated TF-15A. I was in the 1st TFW when the F-15 came on line and they were called that. I have no idea when the were redesignated F-15B. That occurred in October 1978 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas Schoene" wrote:
C Knowles wrote: I have seen a photo of a F-15E with HARMs on the seldom-used outboard wing stations but it was simply an eval for the Weasel role. Since the F-16 picked up this role it was not proceded with. Just to nitpick, are you sure that wasn't one of the very early TF-15As serving as a Strike Eagle demonstrator? The pictures I've seen with HARM were on 71-0291. McD's demonstrator TF-15A (F-15B) which also served as the Strike Eagle demonstrator. The South Korean F-15K apparently will have the option of carrying HARM; it's part of the weapon package that went with the aircraft. -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brett" wrote in message ... "B2431" wrote: From: "Kevin Brooks" "Thomas Schoene" wrote in message link.net... C Knowles wrote: I have seen a photo of a F-15E with HARMs on the seldom-used outboard wing stations but it was simply an eval for the Weasel role. Since the F-16 picked up this role it was not proceded with. Just to nitpick, are you sure that wasn't one of the very early TF-15As serving as a Strike Eagle demonstrator? TF-15A? I believe you would be referring to the F-15B. Brooks The first few 2 seater F-15s were disignated TF-15A. I was in the 1st TFW when the F-15 came on line and they were called that. I have no idea when the were redesignated F-15B. That occurred in October 1978 Which was well before HARM came online (1983). Though to be honest I never knew that they once referred to the two seaters as anything but B (or later D and E) models in USAF service (I was a kid near Langley AFB when the 1st TFW stood up with the Eagle, and can't actually recall the use of the TF designation, but that was a looong time ago!). Thanks for the historical note. Brooks |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pictures with a demonstrator carrying a HARM on a LAU attached
to a bomb rack only show that the Strike Eagle is capable of "carrying" the missile. Was there any weapon system making it capable of acquiring, tracking, targeting and launching associated with it? As a former Prowler guy, HARM and SEAD is a very complex mission, requiring more than just a platform and "weapon package" associated with it. ALQ-99 receivers are used on the EA-6B to "acquire" the RADAR, I'm not sure what the C/J's use, did the Koreans buy the same system as the C/J's use? There is the longstanding arguement on which a/c is better at SEAD, the Prowler or the C/J, which is debateable. But in the Jamming mission, (both RADAR and COMM's) nothing comes close to the Prowler. ![]() On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:02:34 GMT, "Brett" wrote: "Thomas Schoene" wrote: C Knowles wrote: I have seen a photo of a F-15E with HARMs on the seldom-used outboard wing stations but it was simply an eval for the Weasel role. Since the F-16 picked up this role it was not proceded with. Just to nitpick, are you sure that wasn't one of the very early TF-15As serving as a Strike Eagle demonstrator? The pictures I've seen with HARM were on 71-0291. McD's demonstrator TF-15A (F-15B) which also served as the Strike Eagle demonstrator. The South Korean F-15K apparently will have the option of carrying HARM; it's part of the weapon package that went with the aircraft. -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"fudog50" wrote:
Pictures with a demonstrator carrying a HARM on a LAU attached to a bomb rack only show that the Strike Eagle is capable of "carrying" the missile. Was there any weapon system making it capable of acquiring, tracking, targeting and launching associated with it? Doesn't Raython market the HARM Targeting System as being suitable for almost any MIL-STD-1553 compatible aircraft with a RWR. The F-15E has the ALR-56, and is I believe MIL-STD-1553 compatible. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best dogfight gun? | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 317 | January 24th 04 06:24 PM |
Can the F-14 carry six AIM-54s and land on carrier? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 1 | October 29th 03 08:14 PM |
No uranium, no munitions, no missiles, no programmes | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 50 | October 22nd 03 10:12 PM |
Poland: French Missile Report Was Wrong | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 8 | October 7th 03 10:54 PM |