![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a student pilot getting ready to solo next week (26 hours now). I
am interested in a 1/3rd share of a '65 P206 due to my large family. Apparently annual insurance is currently $1950. The seller has contacted the partnership's insurance broker who has checked with their current insurer who states they will not insure me when I get my private. The selling partner has expressed concern about wasting the broker's time. I obviously am not interested in buying into a plane I won't be able to fly. Does anyone have any thoughts or experience on this? Thanks much. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't worry about wasting the broker's time--that's their job to provide
info on what they can and cannot do. Rates definitely vary based on number of hours and type of experience, and I wouldn't be surprised if they had a minimum of at least 125 hours, and/or a number of hours of dual instruction in the airplane. If the other partners are high time pilots, and you are added to the insurance, the rate will almost certainly increase by a very significant percentage. If the partner doesn't want to call the broker, call him yourself or call any insurance broker. The rates and minimum hours will vary somewhat from company to company, but it will give you a good idea of what the hurdle will be. Max T, MCFI Shawn wrote in message om... I am a student pilot getting ready to solo next week (26 hours now). I am interested in a 1/3rd share of a '65 P206 due to my large family. Apparently annual insurance is currently $1950. The seller has contacted the partnership's insurance broker who has checked with their current insurer who states they will not insure me when I get my private. The selling partner has expressed concern about wasting the broker's time. I obviously am not interested in buying into a plane I won't be able to fly. Does anyone have any thoughts or experience on this? Thanks much. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Verghese" wrote in message . 3.44... (Shawn) wrote in om: A P206 is quite a lot of airplane for a new pilot. Even if you waited until after getting your private certificate, you probably would have a hard time getting affordable insurance (some underwriters may not even cover you). Why? It is a relatively slow, fixed gear airplane. The main addition to a a 172 is a CS prop and two more seats. I don't understand why a new PP would be difficult to insure. Mike MU-2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Shawn wrote: I am a student pilot getting ready to solo next week (26 hours now). I am interested in a 1/3rd share of a '65 P206 due to my large family. It is going to be really hard to get insured at around 60 hours (which is where I'd guess you'll finish). A lot of underwriters will want 250tt and an instrument rating and will want 15-25 hours in type before you solo. However, there is probably *some* underwriter that will cover you for a large premium, but you'll need a broker to negotiate that for you. Absolutely request a *quote* if you are serious. I got a few brokers to estimate for me but when I finally got quotes the actual premiums were significantly different (lower, luckily) and came with different training requirements. One other thing you need to do is call Avemco directly. They are the only underwriter that doesn't work through brokers. They seem willing to write unusual risks (at alarming rates) and will pro-rate a reduction in your premium as you satisfy risk-lowering requirements. For example, if you bought a plane and got a hangar in 6 months you could get their 10% hangar discount for the last 6 months of the policy. As you get more time in type, complete your instrument rating, complete some recommended safety courses you can get the discounts immediately rather than waiting until your next renewal. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Mike Rapoport wrote: Why? It is a relatively slow, fixed gear airplane. The main addition to a a 172 is a CS prop and two more seats. I don't understand why a new PP would be difficult to insure. Underwriters look at accident history. A 206 is a travelling plane. When people crash it they've loaded 6 people into it and flown it into weather they/it can't handle because they need to Get There. The crashes are due to errors in judgement rather than skill. A 206 requires a lot more judgement than a 172, even if not much more skill. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You will not be wasting the insurance broker's time by talking to him. That
is his job and if he doesn't like it then it is time to look for a new broker. You need to find out what the insurance company requires for you to be covered as a named pilot and then start jumping through the hoops. "No" is not an answer. "Ten hours with an instructor" is an answer. The Cessna 206 is a high performance airplane with a constant speed prop. It is very easy to fly and some pilots learn to fly in them. It requires a little more advance planning when entering the pattern and it is very nose heavy, but it is not so fast that a low time pilot is going to get very far behind it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ben Jackson" wrote in message news:jdXkb.827639$YN5.865583@sccrnsc01... | In article et, | Mike Rapoport wrote: | | Why? It is a relatively slow, fixed gear airplane. The main addition to a | a 172 is a CS prop and two more seats. I don't understand why a new PP | would be difficult to insure. | | Underwriters look at accident history. Fine. If you look at the accident history of the Cessna 206 you will find it has a much better than average safety record, comparable to that of the Cessna 172 and 182. The most common accident in the 206 is dropping it on its nose when landing -- not often a fatal mistake, but it does damage the nose gear. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ben Jackson" wrote in message . net... | In article , | Shawn wrote: | I am a student pilot getting ready to solo next week (26 hours now). I | am interested in a 1/3rd share of a '65 P206 due to my large family. | | It is going to be really hard to get insured at around 60 hours (which | is where I'd guess you'll finish). A lot of underwriters will want | 250tt and an instrument rating and will want 15-25 hours in type | before you solo. My own experience is that insurance companies are demanding five to ten hours of dual and no minimum time for a 206. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The cost of war | Mark Hickey | Home Built | 56 | October 27th 04 05:54 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |