![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy,
Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) has been integrated into quite a few automotive engines over the past few years. After reading an article about it, and googling for the availability of GDI fuel injectors I started thinking this might be a cool direction to go in for those persons interested in engine design, particularly the HCI Radial guys. One engine I've always thought was elegant was the 29 packard aero- diesel because it did away with the second valve per cylinder. If they had had forced induction in those days the old packard radial might have been a keeper rather than an oddity. It occurs to me that GDI recreates the possibility of a uni-valve layout. If there is no fuel in the intake manifold, there is less reason to seperate the intake and exhaust gasses. With a big venturi on the intake side, there may not even be a need for forced induction. One problem that would certainly have to be overcome in this arrangment, is that air metering in the manifold is not preportional to fuel metering. Some exhaust gases may be recycled during normal operation, particularly during decelaration. If the manifold is 'T' shaped rather than 'L' shaped, the inlet pressure does not accurately reflect the volume of air going into the cylinder. So you'd have to base your fuel flow on something other than manifold pressure. Probably a combination of a known throttle map (in the form of a cam or wedge) and a barometric lifter of some sort. Anyway. If I was going to build a new gas aviation engine, I would be inclined to look at a radial GDI with 1 valve per cylinder, 1 throttle body per cylinder, a relatively low pressure centrifugal supercharging setup on a planetary gear around the prop shaft. The fuel system would be similar to the bosch piston pump injection system that was used on the Packard, and many engines since. So you'd still have 2 cams, except one is for the valves, and the other actuates the injection pulse. How to handle mixture control still baffles me. But this is just shooting the breeze. Anyway... Comments welcomed. Thanks! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Preheating engines: Airplane engines versus auto engines | Peter R. | Owning | 86 | January 2nd 08 07:48 PM |
Aircraft with the most jet engines? | Dallas | Aviation Photos | 24 | June 27th 07 12:07 AM |
A few thoughts on "Aircraft Engines" vs. the regular kind. | Bret Ludwig | Home Built | 20 | February 18th 06 10:31 PM |
New v220 v300 aircraft engines | bluesky | Piloting | 1 | February 11th 05 05:55 AM |
Harley Davidson engines for aircraft | Brett | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | August 27th 04 02:13 PM |