![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. I love the people who say they can buy an Aircraft Engine for some
small amount of money and bolt it on and go flying. What they mean is that after decades of search they managed to flam some widow out of an engine for a tenth market price, they bought some oddball no one wants, or they have an engine that is such a mutt with no logs and bootleg repairs even the airboaters eschew it. Good aircraft engines, such as they are, are worth a lot of money if they are airworthy certificated engines. If you have one, it's generally economically more advantageously bolted on the front of a certificated aircraft. We all know you can weld and machine about anything and all the little tricks, or most of them anyway. There is no consistent source of safe aircraft engines below market price. Even if you are willing to generate very fictional logbooks, like most of the FBOs I know. It isn't that hard. 2. If the Lycoming and Continental paradigm of large displacement light slow turning engine was so great for aircraft, they would be great for a lot of other things as well. Teledyne Continental and Textron Lycoming have absolutely no interest in marketing or developing their ridiculous museum pieces for any other markets whatsoever. The reason is simple, no one likes being subject to ridicule. Which they know would be the case. 3. "All the people who use an automotive conversion spend fifteen thousand dollars anyway". You are comparing apples to oranges because the guys spending like this are going all out and not doing any of their own fabrication. And ignoring the fact that their per hour has to be a lot cheaper because once done rebuilds have to be radically cheaper. 4. "You are in all reality only going to fly it a few hundred hours anyway". Well if that's the case, join a flying club (a real club) or just rent an airplane. There are others but that's enough for now. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bret Ludwig wrote:
1. I love the people who say they can buy an Aircraft Engine for some small amount of money and bolt it on and go flying. What they mean is that after decades of search they managed to flam some widow out of an engine for a tenth market price, they bought some oddball no one wants, or they have an engine that is such a mutt with no logs and bootleg repairs even the airboaters eschew it. Your ignorance never fails to amaze, maybe that is what you do to people so you assume that is what all people do. (shakes head in disbelief) Jerry I would rather hunt with Dick Cheany than ride with Ted Kennedy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Springer" wrote in message ... Your ignorance never fails to amaze, maybe that is what you do to people so you assume that is what all people do. (shakes head in disbelief) Jerry I would rather hunt with Dick Cheany than ride with Ted Kennedy Who's Dick Cheany?? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CyberSam wrote:
"Jerry Springer" wrote in message ... Your ignorance never fails to amaze, maybe that is what you do to people so you assume that is what all people do. (shakes head in disbelief) Jerry I would rather hunt with Dick Cheany than ride with Ted Kennedy Who's Dick Cheany?? That is the new guy that you come up with when you type slower than you think, but then you knew who I meant didn't you. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Jerry Springer" wrote)
I would rather hunt with Dick Cheany than ride with Ted Kennedy Then there's: The Dick Cheney / Bobby Knight Memorial Hunting Expedition. Memorial for who? You'll see... (Ducking and running ...."Serpentine Shelly. Serpentine!" g) Montblack You've got to love a press corps getting Buck Shot and Bird Shot wrong ....for 36 hours!! The clue is in the name, folks. Bambi's dad (a buck) vs. Tweety Bird (a bird). Sheldon: There's no reason to shoot at me, I'm a dentist. The In-Laws (1979) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the irony of it all....
Texas Parks & Wildlife magazine - November 2005 On the cover - Why group hunts are more efficient - and more fun. And on page 22/23 - A double page centerfold of a fat guy in an orange vest raising his shotgun - and a pheasant climbing for dear life - straight lined up with the camera! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Long stroke, slow turning engines ARE still used and designed all the time
in agricultural, industrial, and marine applications. It all depends on where you want your peak torque at. In an aircraft engine, the best prop efficiency trade-off is in the 2200 - 2500 rpm range and the most efficient way to transmit power is via direct drive, hence engines are designed for the applications in which they are used. John Stricker "Bret Ludwig" wrote in message ups.com... 2. If the Lycoming and Continental paradigm of large displacement light slow turning engine was so great for aircraft, they would be great for a lot of other things as well. Teledyne Continental and Textron Lycoming have absolutely no interest in marketing or developing their ridiculous museum pieces for any other markets whatsoever. The reason is simple, no one likes being subject to ridicule. Which they know would be the case. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JStricker wrote: Long stroke, slow turning engines ARE still used and designed all the time in agricultural, industrial, and marine applications. It all depends on where you want your peak torque at. In an aircraft engine, the best prop efficiency trade-off is in the 2200 - 2500 rpm range and the most efficient way to transmit power is via direct drive, hence engines are designed for the applications in which they are used. Where are the long stroke, slow turning gas small boat engines? In museums. Inboards ALL use autoderivative engines and ahve for almost 50 years |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bret Ludwig wrote:
JStricker wrote: Long stroke, slow turning engines ARE still used and designed all the time in agricultural, industrial, and marine applications. It all depends on where you want your peak torque at. In an aircraft engine, the best prop efficiency trade-off is in the 2200 - 2500 rpm range and the most efficient way to transmit power is via direct drive, hence engines are designed for the applications in which they are used. Where are the long stroke, slow turning gas small boat engines? In museums. Inboards ALL use autoderivative engines and ahve for almost 50 years Small boat motors turn small "props" at high speeds for usually not long periods of time. Besides cooling is usually not a problem with a large supply of cooling fluid! ;-) John |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where did I say anything about small gas boat engines?
John Stricker "Bret Ludwig" wrote in message ups.com... Where are the long stroke, slow turning gas small boat engines? In museums. Inboards ALL use autoderivative engines and ahve for almost 50 years |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|