![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In response to those who suggested that perhaps the other frustrated student
was too fearful to proceed, there ARE other things that get in the way of a person's desire to fly. Maybe not to the point of making a "promising student" quit, but at least to cause a significant setback! Here's my story: I began airplane instruction in August in a Cessna. No one has been more devoted than I, beginning with the ground school and getting the written exam out of the way, then being available whenever my instructor suggested we fly and spending countless hours reading and studying at home. In October, just after I soloed, little things started to go wrong with the airplane, not significant enough to ground us, but things that needed attention nonetheless: nav lights out (aren't they supposed to be disconnected and labeled inoperative?), primer frozen shut (POH says to use the primer, not pump the throttle), nosewheel is dry and cracked, and radio was intermittent and even cut out completely once on my CFI and me. This was the biggest source of worry for ME, as a new solo pilot, not only because I did not want to have to deal with a failed radio during initial solo flights, but also because ATCs made no secret that they were understandably annoyed with our garbled radio transmissions. The last thing a new solo pilot needs is to have ATCs annoyed with them! After repeatedly being told to "jiggle the switch" and spray contact cleaner into the jacks, they finally got the radio working dependably again. The other issues remained unresolved. Recently, the airplane was down for four days for its 100-hr inspection/maintenance. My CFI and I were the first scheduled to fly it afterwards. Not only were none of the previously mentioned squawks resolved, but run-up revealed a dead vacuum pump and a significant magneto/plug problem on the right with rough-running engine. At that point, I refused to continue to fly the airplane and wrote a letter to my CFI listing my maintenance concerns and referencing how many pilots have said "don't ignore what the airplane is telling you!" My CFI forwarded my letter to the owners of the airplane and the airplane was subsequently grounded for another week. I received a copy of the response to my CFI from one of the owners. He was defensive about the problems with the airplane and about the competency of his mechanic. But the real kicker was that he made me sound like some kind of wacko for suggesting that I was "connected enough" with the airplane to hear it "talking" to me and went on to point out that it is just a machine and that things go wrong and need fixing! Well, DUH! It isn't as if I hear voices!! -- I know full well that it is a machine and that things need fixing -- that's PRECISELY the point. If those little things that are too insignificant to fix in a 3-month period are not addressed in a 100-hr, how confident is a student pilot supposed to feel about the competency of the maintenance or about what priority maintenance is given by the CFI, owners, or school? I don't think it's unusual for some new solo pilots to have some fears--confidence builds the more you fly. While the CFI and the flight school have no control over demons at play inside a student's brain, they ARE capable and in control of eliminating as many safety concerns as possible by assuring that maintenance issues with the airplane are addressed in a reasonable, timely way. Is it reasonable for a student to expect that airplane coming out of a 100-hr or an annual should have fewer squawks than it did going in? If old squawks remain unaddressed after a 100-hr, should a student take a stand? or should he/she ignore their own growing concerns and continue to fly the airplane because the CFI and the school don't seem concerned? While I did ultimately take a stand, I feel it should have been up to my CFI to speak up about the maintenance on behalf of ALL the students, not up to one of the students. In response to my letter, my CFI called to say my letter was forwarded to the owners of the airplane and that I needed to find someone else to fly with. I also received a cc of the letter the owners wrote back to my CFI and a refund of the unused portion of $$ I had paid them. They obviously want nothing further to do with me -- why? for taking a stand about my own safety? I need more solo, the cross-countries, night and hood time. I have other options available ... but my point in writing all of this is that things that halt a student's progress are not always in the head of the student. CFIs and flight schools drop the ball holding up responsibilities on their end too, even with the most promising students! It is discouraging, to say the least, when you are motivated to push ahead but find yourself having to make the decision to leave and go elsewhere or to quit. Another Frustrated Student Pilot |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |