![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I flew JetsGo flight 178 (Toronto to Vancouver) on 19 January 2005. The
equipment was an MD-83. I'm convinced the right-hand engine was not operational! I could not see the turbofan spinning (looked stationary) and the flight took about an hour longer than scheduled (they blamed strong headwinds). Is this possible? Can/should/is it legal for a flight to take off and fly an entire route with one engine? How much flight time would this add? Are there publically-available safety logs that would record if this was the case? How are JetsGo's safety standards? Lots of questions! Thanks S. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Owning | 4 | September 27th 04 07:36 PM |
In-Flight Engine Failure | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 59 | April 30th 04 08:40 AM |
Multi-Engine Before Commercial? | David B. Cole | Piloting | 30 | April 18th 04 04:46 PM |
Emergency Procedures | RD | Piloting | 13 | April 11th 04 08:25 PM |
Gasflow of VW engine | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | July 14th 03 08:06 AM |