A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

change in ADS-B rule interpretation!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old February 10th 15, 01:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Pasker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default change in ADS-B rule interpretation!

from https://www.federalregister.gov/arti...rt-air-traffic


Under paragraph (b)(1) of that section, in order to operate an aircraft below 18,000 feet MSL and in identified airspace described subsequently in § 91.225, an aircraft must be equipped with equipment that "meets the requirements of TSO-C166b; or TSO-C154c . . .". In reviewing these paragraphs, the FAA notes that the regulatory text implies that the equipment must meet all the requirements of the referenced TSOs. As the ADS-B Out rule is a performance-based rule, it was not the FAA's intent to arguably limit operators to only install equipment marked with a TSO in accordance with 14 CFR part 21, subpart O. The FAA's intent was to permit equipment that meets the performance requirements set forth in the referenced TSOs.



In the NPRM, the FAA proposed in § 91.225(a)(1) and (c)(1) that the equipment installed "Meets the performance requirements in TSO-C-166a" (72 FR 56947, 56971). The inadvertent removal of the word "performance" in the paragraphs implementing these provisions in the final rule was in error and resulted in confusion as to whether the regulation permits other than equipment marked with a TSO, provided that equipment met the specified performance requirements.



So it looks like the equipment must meet the TSO performance requirements, but it doesn't necessarily have to be TSO'd

This is great news!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USA Proposed Rule Change on Start Time Reporting Tim Taylor Soaring 18 January 30th 15 03:08 AM
Draft Rule Change could effect S-LSA, E-LSA, and Experimental Gliders Tom (2NO) Soaring 8 April 6th 14 04:36 AM
US: TSA RE-INTERPRETATION Judy Ruprecht Soaring 0 October 22nd 04 05:17 PM
FAA rule change for charity flights? Ben Haas Owning 7 January 19th 04 04:40 PM
FAR 91.171 interpretation James L. Freeman Instrument Flight Rules 8 September 21st 03 06:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.