![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How much separation is required by the tower for a/c taking off and landing?
I was in position and holding on 34 at Asheville, NC (AVL) today, with a plane on final, me in position and holding, and a 182 in front of me taking off. Before his wheels left the runway, I was cleared for take-off. I didn't feel that it was any safety issue on an 8000' runway, but it struck me as something to ask about here, especially since I was the sandwich meat in the middle. -- Jeff 'The Wizard of Draws' Bucchino Cartoons with a Touch of Magic http://www.wizardofdraws.com More Cartoons with a Touch of Magic http://www.cartoonclipart.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you report the departing traffic in sight, you can maintain visual separation, and the controller can use non-standard separation. Another option is the controller can have you both (or all) in sight, and he can provide instructions to you to avoid a conflict. Lynne Wizard of Draws wrote: How much separation is required by the tower for a/c taking off and landing? I was in position and holding on 34 at Asheville, NC (AVL) today, with a plane on final, me in position and holding, and a 182 in front of me taking off. Before his wheels left the runway, I was cleared for take-off. I didn't feel that it was any safety issue on an 8000' runway, but it struck me as something to ask about here, especially since I was the sandwich meat in the middle. -- Jeff 'The Wizard of Draws' Bucchino Cartoons with a Touch of Magic=81 http://www.wizardofdraws.com More Cartoons with a Touch of Magic=81 http://www.cartoonclipart.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wizard of Draws wrote:
How much separation is required by the tower for a/c taking off and landing? Sometime last year I was purposely flying very fast on final into Baltimore/Washington when the tower controller called me to ask that I slow down because he needed 3,000 feet between my IFR Bonanza and the IFR Tomahawk that just landed and was still on the runway. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Wizard of Draws wrote: How much separation is required by the tower for a/c taking off and landing? 3000 feet between singles. A single behind a twin is 4500. A twin between a single is 4500. If anything is over 12,500 in weight then it's 6000 feet. For landing it's the same as takeoff except that when anything above 12,500 is involved then that aircraft can only be on the runway by himself. I was in position and holding on 34 at Asheville, NC (AVL) today, with a plane on final, me in position and holding, and a 182 in front of me taking off. Before his wheels left the runway, I was cleared for take-off. The rule is you cannot start your takeoff roll until the required separation exists. He probably hurried your clearance because of the plane on final. Having one single chase another down the runway is common at any busy GA airport. Being 500-700 feet short on separation is a trivial matter. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lynne wrote: If you report the departing traffic in sight, you can maintain visual separation, No. Visual separation is never used to reduce runway separation. and the controller can use non-standard separation. Just what might that be? Another option is the controller can have you both (or all) in sight, and he can provide instructions to you to avoid a conflict. You are thinking of separation that may be required of airborne aircraft. He was asking about runway separation. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter R. wrote: Wizard of Draws wrote: How much separation is required by the tower for a/c taking off and landing? Sometime last year I was purposely flying very fast on final into Baltimore/Washington when the tower controller called me to ask that I slow down because he needed 3,000 feet between my IFR Bonanza and the IFR Tomahawk that just landed and was still on the runway. 3000 is correct. IFR or VFR is irrelavant. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Newps wrote: Wizard of Draws wrote: How much separation is required by the tower for a/c taking off and landing? 3000 feet between singles. A single behind a twin is 4500. Whoops, should say 3000. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff,
The 'local' ATC station is responsible for airborne traffic and must provide 'standard' separation but ACTUAL avoidance is always the first responsibility of the pilot. They may give advisories and often do but it is only required when conditions permit. Once traffic has been pointed out to you and you acknowledge having the traffic in sight, ATC does not need to advise you ever again. Consequently, there are times when it is to your advantage not to tell ATC that you have the traffic. Happened to me once when ATC told me of a KC-10 on short final to a runway. I said I had it in sight. What I didn't know was that it was a touch-and-go and not a full-stop. A bit later it filled my windshield but ATC he don't say nothin'. Gene |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are some of the separation rules from the ATC regulations;
http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/ATC/index.htm The parts below are just a simplification of the basic rules. The actual rules are quite in-depth and have to consider the actions of the aircraft involved, the type of flight plan, airspace classification, and whether wake turbulence will be a factor. 7-2-1. VISUAL SEPARATION Aircraft may be separated by visual means, as provided in this paragraph, when other approved separation is assured before and after the application of visual separation. To ensure that other separation will exist, consider aircraft performance, wake turbulence, closure rate, routes of flight, and known weather conditions. Reported weather conditions must allow the aircraft to remain within sight until other separation exists. Do not apply visual separation between successive departures when departure routes and/or aircraft performance preclude maintaining separation. a. TERMINAL. Visual separation may be applied between aircraft under the control of the same facility within the terminal area up to but not including FL 180, provided: 1. Communication is maintained with at least one of the aircraft involved or the capability to communicate immediately as prescribed in para 3-9-3, Departure Control Instructions, subpara a2 is available, and: 2. The aircraft are visually observed by the tower and visual separation is maintained between the aircraft by the tower. The tower shall not provide visual separation between aircraft when wake turbulence separation is required or when the lead aircraft is a B757. 3. A pilot sees another aircraft and is instructed to maintain visual separation from the aircraft as follows: (a) Tell the pilot about the other aircraft including position, direction and, unless it is obvious, the other aircraft's intention. (b) Obtain acknowledgment from the pilot that the other aircraft is in sight. (c) Instruct the pilot to maintain visual separation from that aircraft. (d) Advise the pilot if the radar targets appear likely to converge. NOTE- Issue this advisory in conjunction with the instruction to maintain visual separation, or thereafter if the controller subsequently becomes aware that the targets are merging. (e) If the aircraft are on converging courses, inform the other aircraft of the traffic and that visual separation is being applied. (f) If the pilot advises he/she has the traffic in sight and will maintain visual separation from it (the pilot must use that entire phrase), the controller need only "approve" the operation instead of restating the instructions. PHRASEOLOGY- TRAFFIC, (clock position and distance), (direction)-BOUND, (type of aircraft), (intentions and other relevant information). If applicable, ON CONVERGING COURSE. DO YOU HAVE IT IN SIGHT? If the answer is in the affirmative, MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION. If the pilot advises he/she has the traffic in sight and will maintain visual separation from it (pilot must use that entire phrase): APPROVED. If aircraft are on converging courses, advise the other aircraft: TRAFFIC, (clock position and distance), (direction)-BOUND, (type of aircraft), HAS YOU IN SIGHT AND WILL MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION. Runway separation requirements are as follows; 3-9-6. SAME RUNWAY SEPARATION Separate a departing aircraft from a preceding departing or arriving aircraft using the same runway by ensuring that it does not begin takeoff roll until: a. The other aircraft has departed and crossed the runway end or turned to avert any conflict. If you can determine distances by reference to suitable landmarks, the other aircraft needs only be airborne if the following minimum distance exists between aircraft: (See FIG 3-9-1 and FIG 3-9-2.) 1. When only Category I aircraft are involved- 3,000 feet. 2. When a Category I aircraft is preceded by a Category II aircraft- 3,000 feet. 3. When either the succeeding or both are Category II aircraft- 4,500 feet. 4. When either is a Category III aircraft- 6,000 feet. 5. When the succeeding aircraft is a helicopter, visual separation may be applied in lieu of using distance minima. NOTE- Aircraft same runway separation (SRS) categories are specified in Appendices A, B, and C and based upon the following definitions: CATEGORY I- small aircraft weighing 12,500 lbs. or less, with a single propeller driven engine, and all helicopters. CATEGORY II- small aircraft weighing 12,500 lbs. or less, with propeller driven twin-engines. CATEGORY III- all other aircraft. Gene Whitt wrote: Jeff, The 'local' ATC station is responsible for airborne traffic and must provide 'standard' separation but ACTUAL avoidance is always the first responsibility of the pilot. They may give advisories and often do but it is only required when conditions permit. Once traffic has been pointed out to you and you acknowledge having the traffic in sight, ATC does not need to advise you ever again. Consequently, there are times when it is to your advantage not to tell ATC that you have the traffic. Happened to me once when ATC told me of a KC-10 on short final to a runway. I said I had it in sight. What I didn't know was that it was a touch-and-go and not a full-stop. A bit later it filled my windshield but ATC he don't say nothin'. Gene |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gene Whitt wrote: Jeff, The 'local' ATC station is responsible for airborne traffic and must provide 'standard' separation but ACTUAL avoidance is always the first responsibility of the pilot. They may give advisories and often do but it is only required when conditions permit. You're all mixed up here. You are mixing all the separation requirements and throwing them in to one pot. When you say standard separation to a controller that always means 1000 or 3 miles(5 miles for a center controller). At a class D tower the controller is required to provide IFR separation to IFR aircraft. Usually this is done by issuing the headings given to them by the approach control that gave the IFR release. If any aircraft is VFR there is no separation standard. If they miss you're golden. Traffic advisories are required per the .65. Once traffic has been pointed out to you and you acknowledge having the traffic in sight, ATC does not need to advise you ever again. ATC may be required to tell you to maintain visual separation. Depends on if you're IFr or VFR and the type of airspace. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flight of two, IFR | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | January 13th 20 01:12 PM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Piloting | 125 | October 15th 04 07:42 PM |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
New Oshkosh Tower | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 05:35 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |