200+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html


Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to newsgroups where
your chance of encountering anybody who might even think about any of it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back together?
(Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!

TRUTH wrote:
Peter Twydell wrote in news:+1usDfBfrW
:

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html

Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to newsgroups where
your chance of encountering anybody who might even think about any of
it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back together?
(Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.



Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the evidence before posting such
childish nonsense. The WTC was taken down by controlled demolitions.
THAT'S where the evidence points. And since there's no evidence
otherwise, you loose.

So take your kooky opinions to alt.imagullibledickhead.xx. You understand
that, moron?

Before you get too excited you should read the cite you provided. It
contains a few errors the most glaring of which is the statement #30

9/11 - FAA bans takeoffs at 9:26 am for all civilian, military, or law enforcement aircraft (FAA, Time)

FAA didn't then, and does not now, have authority over military
flight operations.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

TRUTH wrote

So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy?

Exactly.. Can you imaginge going to court and saying you recognize the
criminal that shot you, but couldn't remember if it was at a supermarket
or a gas station?


Your version of the truth is that a much smaller military plane crashed
into the Pentagon. The "evidence" you are pointing to also contradicts
your other statements.

From http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html

"New techniques for navigation and flight control are used on the
767-200... An automatic flight control system coupled with a computer
allows storage of an entire flight plan and gives automatic guidance and
control of the aircraft from takeoff to landing." - NASA

You said earlier that it was the plane was controlled remotely and the
Arabs onboard couldn't have made it crash, because they couldn't have
flown it to the correct location. You also indicated it was controlled
from a remote location.

mrtravel wrote in news:AEjLf.51613$dW3.2725
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com:

TRUTH wrote

So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy?

Exactly.. Can you imaginge going to court and saying you recognize the
criminal that shot you, but couldn't remember if it was at a
supermarket
or a gas station?


Your version of the truth is that a much smaller military plane crashed
into the Pentagon. The "evidence" you are pointing to also contradicts
your other statements.

From http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html

"New techniques for navigation and flight control are used on the
767-200... An automatic flight control system coupled with a computer
allows storage of an entire flight plan and gives automatic guidance
and
control of the aircraft from takeoff to landing." - NASA

You said earlier that it was the plane was controlled remotely and the
Arabs onboard couldn't have made it crash, because they couldn't have
flown it to the correct location. You also indicated it was controlled
from a remote location.





If that's your way of seeing things, then your thinking is faulty and
there's absulutely nothing I can say

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:eThLf.22983$Ug4.6352@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Peter Twydell wrote in news:+1usDfBfrW
:

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html
Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody
right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to newsgroups
where your chance of encountering anybody who might even think about
any of
it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back together?
(Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.


Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the evidence before posting
such childish nonsense. The WTC was taken down by controlled
demolitions. THAT'S where the evidence points. And since there's no
evidence otherwise, you loose.

So take your kooky opinions to alt.imagullibledickhead.xx. You
understand that, moron?
Before you get too excited you should read the cite you provided.
It
contains a few errors the most glaring of which is the statement #30
9/11 - FAA bans takeoffs at 9:26 am for all civilian, military, or
law enforcement aircraft (FAA, Time)
FAA didn't then, and does not now, have authority over military
flight operations.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy? How about
applying that type of thinking to the government's version of 9/11!

I said nothing of the kind, did I? I pointed out an error in a cite
YOU provided. The same cite that implies a link between 9/11 and a
television show and a never implemented operation from 1962.

You were busy spewing your filth at someone who said what most of us
are thinking, but are too polite to say.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

TRUTH wrote:

So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy? How about
applying that type of thinking to the government's version of 9/11!


- Salman Rushdie 'given US air ban week before terrorist attacks'

This isn't the same as Salman Rushdie actually being banned, is it?
He only says he was.

What, exactly, does this have to do with 9/11?
Why would banning him indicate the government caused the plane crashes?

Dan wrote in news:ASjLf.23568$Ug4.8809@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:eThLf.22983$Ug4.6352@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Peter Twydell wrote in news:+1usDfBfrW
:

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html
Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody
right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to newsgroups
where your chance of encountering anybody who might even think
about
any of
it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back together?
(Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.


Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the evidence before posting
such childish nonsense. The WTC was taken down by controlled
demolitions. THAT'S where the evidence points. And since there's no
evidence otherwise, you loose.

So take your kooky opinions to alt.imagullibledickhead.xx. You
understand that, moron?
Before you get too excited you should read the cite you provided.
It
contains a few errors the most glaring of which is the statement #
30
9/11 - FAA bans takeoffs at 9:26 am for all civilian, military, or
law enforcement aircraft (FAA, Time)
FAA didn't then, and does not now, have authority over military
flight operations.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy? How about
applying that type of thinking to the government's version of 9/11!

I said nothing of the kind, did I? I pointed out an error in a cite
YOU provided. The same cite that implies a link between 9/11 and a
television show and a never implemented operation from 1962.

You were busy spewing your filth at someone who said what most of us
are thinking, but are too polite to say.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




What the hell's wrong with you? How about looking at the mainstream media
articles and stop nitpicking? btw, your version of events is filth with
no proof

mrtravel wrote in news:q0kLf.51620$dW3.50062
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com:

TRUTH wrote:

So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy? How about
applying that type of thinking to the government's version of 9/11!


- Salman Rushdie 'given US air ban week before terrorist attacks'

This isn't the same as Salman Rushdie actually being banned, is it?
He only says he was.

What, exactly, does this have to do with 9/11?
Why would banning him indicate the government caused the plane crashes?




If you can't put all those articles in context then there's nothing I can
do for you. Sorry.

Stop replying to this idiot.

Stop replying to this idiot.