![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a my two-year transponder/static system check while visiting my mother
in San Antonio. When I departed, I noticed the airspeed didn't come up like it should. I attributed this to shifting winds and assumed I had a slight tailwind. Then in cruise, I did my normal operating performance check. My IAS was about 30 knots low, but my groundspeed was normal. I tapped on the airspeed indicator and it gained six knots. Question #1: How would a transponder/static check screw up my airspeed? Was this just coincidence? Question #2: How do you check accuracy of an airspeed indicator? Question #3: How long should you go before replacing an airspeed indicator? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in message
... I had a my two-year transponder/static system check while visiting my mother in San Antonio. When I departed, I noticed the airspeed didn't come up like Debris in your pitot system could cause inaccuracy of the airspeed indicator, as could a leak in the system. While your airspeed indicator could be malfunctioning, it is more likely to be a problem with the pitot system. Are the VSI or altimeter also affected? If so, the problem could be the static system. Do you have an alternate static source on your airplane which you could try? Airspeed indicators are not generally replaced unless they fail; often 40+ year old airplanes still have their original airspeed indicator. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kinda hard to imagine how a tailwind would affect the airspeed indicator. I
think you are due for a visit to the radio shop's instrument department. Bob Gardner "Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in message ... I had a my two-year transponder/static system check while visiting my mother in San Antonio. When I departed, I noticed the airspeed didn't come up like it should. I attributed this to shifting winds and assumed I had a slight tailwind. Then in cruise, I did my normal operating performance check. My IAS was about 30 knots low, but my groundspeed was normal. I tapped on the airspeed indicator and it gained six knots. Question #1: How would a transponder/static check screw up my airspeed? Was this just coincidence? Question #2: How do you check accuracy of an airspeed indicator? Question #3: How long should you go before replacing an airspeed indicator? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in
: Question #1: How would a transponder/static check screw up my airspeed? Was this just coincidence? Connections were likely loosened during the check, and weren't tightened correctly. Perhaps a bug or some dirt were lodged in the system and were loosened during the check. Have it rechecked before flying again. Question #2: How do you check accuracy of an airspeed indicator? Here is where familiarity with your aircraft is essential. If you know it always gets a certain airspeed at a certain power setting and weight, you can get a good idea. You can't check exactly, though, and that's why you need to have a shop you trust check it annually. Question #3: How long should you go before replacing an airspeed indicator? Have a shop check your system. They can tell you if the indicator is bad, but that's rare. More often it's the pitot-static system piping. -- Regards, Stan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The altimeter readings were all correct on the flight. The transponder
reported accurately and center never had a problem with my altitude. So it seems to me, the static system must be correct. "Stan Gosnell" wrote in message ... "Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in : Question #1: How would a transponder/static check screw up my airspeed? Was this just coincidence? Connections were likely loosened during the check, and weren't tightened correctly. Perhaps a bug or some dirt were lodged in the system and were loosened during the check. Have it rechecked before flying again. Question #2: How do you check accuracy of an airspeed indicator? Here is where familiarity with your aircraft is essential. If you know it always gets a certain airspeed at a certain power setting and weight, you can get a good idea. You can't check exactly, though, and that's why you need to have a shop you trust check it annually. Question #3: How long should you go before replacing an airspeed indicator? Have a shop check your system. They can tell you if the indicator is bad, but that's rare. More often it's the pitot-static system piping. -- Regards, Stan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My ASES instructor had a habit of tapping on the altimeter from time to
time. He said you had to do that in the old days to get an accurate reading. "Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in message ... I had a my two-year transponder/static system check while visiting my mother in San Antonio. When I departed, I noticed the airspeed didn't come up like it should. I attributed this to shifting winds and assumed I had a slight tailwind. Then in cruise, I did my normal operating performance check. My IAS was about 30 knots low, but my groundspeed was normal. I tapped on the airspeed indicator and it gained six knots. Question #1: How would a transponder/static check screw up my airspeed? Was this just coincidence? Question #2: How do you check accuracy of an airspeed indicator? Question #3: How long should you go before replacing an airspeed indicator? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's glider stuff. You tap it instead of allowing engine vibration to do
it. If the engine is running, you shouldn't need to touch it. "William W. Plummer" wrote in message news ![]() My ASES instructor had a habit of tapping on the altimeter from time to time. He said you had to do that in the old days to get an accurate reading. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maule Driver" wrote
That's glider stuff. You tap it instead of allowing engine vibration to do it. In the B-707, the altimeter had a built-in altimeter-tapper at about two cps. This was required equipment in the event that the electronic altimeter correction failed or was turned off. Turning the correction off, turned on the tapper. Bob Moore |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Moore" wrote in message = . 6... "Maule Driver" wrote=20 That's glider stuff. You tap it instead of allowing engine = vibration to do it. =20 In the B-707, the altimeter had a built-in altimeter-tapper at about two cps. This was required equipment in the event that the electronic altimeter correction failed or was turned off. Turning the correction off, turned on the tapper. =20 Bob Moore The drum-and-pointer altimeter in my C340 has an internal vibrator. I don't know its frequency, but it's much higher than 2 cps. When it's not vibrating, there's a big hang-up every 1000 feet, at the point where the drum reading indexes to its next value. Engine vibration is insufficient to keep it free. ---JRC--- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wyatt Emmerich" wrote in
news ![]() The altimeter readings were all correct on the flight. The transponder reported accurately and center never had a problem with my altitude. So it seems to me, the static system must be correct. A loose connection in the ram air system could give erroneous airspeed readings while giving correct altimeter readings, as could a partial obstruction. I've seen water in the pitot system give this error also, which is really a partial obstruction. -- Regards, Stan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dual airspeed instruments questions | Louis Gallego | Home Built | 12 | January 9th 04 02:12 AM |
Non TSO'd IFR indicator | Paul Lee | Home Built | 1 | September 19th 03 07:00 PM |
Refurbishing indicator guage faceplates | Merle Wagner | Home Built | 2 | August 20th 03 05:18 AM |
Cloud Height Indicator | Bob Bristow | Home Built | 0 | August 11th 03 07:42 AM |