![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesterday I played with the parallel track function in the CNX-80 for
the first time. I was introducing the CNX-80 to a student and I had planned a VFR flight via airways. My student (rightfully) questioned the wisdom of an over-water segment, so we decided to fly that segment on a 5-mile offset parallel track (it got us over land and was a good excuse to explore a software function I'd never used before). But, here's my question. Why is it in the box to begin with? Other than the gee-wiz marketing value, is there any real practical reason for it existing? VFR, we didn't need it (it was easy enough to follow the coastline visually). IFR, it would have put us outside the airway boundary, so it's probably not very useful there either. Is "fly parallel to V157 offset 2 miles to the left" something that I might ever expect to get in an IFR clearance if I file /G ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Arlington NASCAR track dead? | Rich S. | Home Built | 51 | December 8th 04 03:34 AM |
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? | Paul Adriance | Home Built | 45 | March 30th 04 11:41 PM |
how I map my flights | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | November 30th 03 11:26 PM |
Using Excel or Access to keep track of students/records? | BoDEAN | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 2nd 03 05:07 AM |
Downloading GPS track data and overlaying charts | John Galban | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 25th 03 03:15 PM |