![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I recently learned that VOR can be "calibrated" or adjusted to take into account any error discovered at the 30-day check. For example, if you need to set OBS at 44 to get centered CDI on the 42 radial from VOR on airport checkpoint, and 219 to center CDI on the 222 radial, then you record the errors: + 2 TO and - 3 FROM. Then, when flying an approach, for example, outbound to the airport on the published 250 radial, you turn the OBS to the 250 - 3 = 247 radial and fly centered CDI for more accurate approach. Sounds good to me and makes sense. Is anyone doing it this way? Know of any good reference? thanks Greg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Greg" said:
I recently learned that VOR can be "calibrated" or adjusted to take into account any error discovered at the 30-day check. For example, if you need to set OBS at 44 to get centered CDI on the 42 radial from VOR on airport checkpoint, and 219 to center CDI on the 222 radial, then you record the errors: + 2 TO and - 3 FROM. Then, when flying an approach, for example, outbound to the airport on the published 250 radial, you turn the OBS to the 250 - 3 = 247 radial and fly centered CDI for more accurate approach. Sounds good to me and makes sense. Is anyone doing it this way? Know of any good reference? As a followup question, if you record a +2 error on one VOR, will get always get +2 on every other VOR on every radial? I was flying our club's Lance the other day and it seemed that VOR 2 was quite a bit off - I'd be right on the airway according to VOR 1, and pretty damn close according to my handheld GPS, but VOR 2 was a good 10 degreess off. I was flying to Ottawa and Ottawa has a VOT, so when I was there I tested it, and VOR 1 was off +4, and VOR 2 was +12. I told the club they needed to fix that VOR 2, and the other Lance flyers said "but when I test them against each other on the field here in Rochester, they come out the same". Is that even possible, or are they really mis-reading the OBSes? I really distrust testing the two VORs against each other, because one could be +10 and the other +14, and you'd think they were fine and dandy and launch into IMC. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ The only complaint I have against WinDoze is that it doesn't always fail at install time. -- Mike Andrews |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg wrote:
I recently learned that VOR can be "calibrated" or adjusted to take into account any error discovered at the 30-day check. Really? Where did you learn that? VOR errors aren't like swinging a compass. Further, the tolerance of the VOR check covers not only the allowable inaccuracy in the on-board equipment, but the imprecision in the way you are testing them (this is why they all have different tolerances) and the inaccuracies inherrent the VOR transmission itself. If the VOR passes the 30 day check, just use it. Approaches and enroute navigation is set up to deal with that much error. There's no way to calibrate the instrument outside a repair shop. By the way, if your unit doesn't read a reciprocal heading on the to/from tests you might want to have it looked at. That almost certainly indicates a defect in the onboard equipment. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Set the OBS to the published radial/course. In the old days
of vacuum tube radios, the tubes would change their tuning as they got hotter and wore out. Thus the 30 day check rule. Modern solid state VOR are very stable and once adjusted are likely to stay within tolerance until they fail. The check can and should be more than the check on one radial. You can check receiver sensitivity by turning the OBS a full 360 and noting the proper operation of the TO/FROM flag. Starting with the needle centered, 10 degrees should give full scale deflection. Then the flag should begin to change at 80 degrees and be off at 90 and switching fully at 100 degrees. Check all the way around. An airborne check 30 miles away from the VOR will detect weak signal processing that may not be detected in a ground check, VOT or check on a visual point close to the VOR, such as a runway threshold that is 5 miles or so. VOR radials are not always where they seem to be, the FAA flight checks airways and instrument approaches, other radials can be off by a substantial amount. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Ron Natalie" wrote in message ... | Greg wrote: | | I recently learned that VOR can be "calibrated" or adjusted to take | into account any error discovered at the 30-day check. | | Really? Where did you learn that? VOR errors aren't like swinging | a compass. Further, the tolerance of the VOR check covers not only | the allowable inaccuracy in the on-board equipment, but the imprecision | in the way you are testing them (this is why they all have different | tolerances) and the inaccuracies inherrent the VOR transmission itself. | | If the VOR passes the 30 day check, just use it. Approaches and | enroute navigation is set up to deal with that much error. There's | no way to calibrate the instrument outside a repair shop. | | By the way, if your unit doesn't read a reciprocal heading on | the to/from tests you might want to have it looked at. That | almost certainly indicates a defect in the onboard equipment. | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg wrote:
Hi, I recently learned that VOR can be "calibrated" or adjusted to take into account any error discovered at the 30-day check. For example, if you need to set OBS at 44 to get centered CDI on the 42 radial from VOR on airport checkpoint, and 219 to center CDI on the 222 radial, then you record the errors: + 2 TO and - 3 FROM. Then, when flying an approach, for example, outbound to the airport on the published 250 radial, you turn the OBS to the 250 - 3 = 247 radial and fly centered CDI for more accurate approach. Sounds good to me and makes sense. Is anyone doing it this way? Know of any good reference? thanks Greg Flight inspection does just that for VOR final approach courses. There is no FAA-approved procedure for pilots to further adjust for individual receiver errors. (An IFR approach GPS solves all those problems ;-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:03:09 -0500, "Jim Macklin"
wrote: Set the OBS to the published radial/course. In the old days of vacuum tube radios, the tubes would change their tuning as they got hotter and wore out. Thus the 30 day check rule. Modern solid state VOR are very stable and once adjusted are likely to stay within tolerance until they fail. Except that back then the rule required that the VOR check be performed every 10 days. About 30 years ago, after solid-state equipment became commonly available, the FAA liberalized the rule to its present 30 day interval. RK Henry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most VOR receivers/heads have a fairly accessable calibration control for
the VOR and another one for the LOC. Most of us who don't choose to finance our radio shop's owner to another week in Hawaii know how to find those controls. However, if you "calibrate" it, you are in violation of FAR 43. If you "adjust" it, you are not. Go figure. Jim "Greg" wrote in message oups.com... Hi, I recently learned that VOR can be "calibrated" or adjusted |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Part of the cost of ownership, I guess. What do they charge these days
to pull out a VOR set, do a good bench check, reinstall, check the antenna and all that stuff? RST Engineering wrote: Most VOR receivers/heads have a fairly accessable calibration control for the VOR and another one for the LOC. Most of us who don't choose to finance our radio shop's owner to another week in Hawaii know how to find those controls. However, if you "calibrate" it, you are in violation of FAR 43. If you "adjust" it, you are not. Go figure. Jim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sam Spade wrote: Part of the cost of ownership, I guess. What do they charge these days to pull out a VOR set, do a good bench check, reinstall, check the antenna and all that stuff? Unless the error is very different at different radials there is no need to pull the unit, the adjustment can be made on the face. Even in high priced California they usually just ask me to put $10 in the McD's fund for the younger techs. Total time is about 10 minutes from crawl in to crawl out of the aircraft. -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() RST Engineering wrote: Most VOR receivers/heads have a fairly accessable calibration control for the VOR and another one for the LOC. Most of us who don't choose to finance our radio shop's owner to another week in Hawaii know how to find those controls. Easier said than done. The screw drivers that do that adjustment are highly unique and seemingly impossible to find. My shop got theirs back in the 50's. I spent about a month calling every place I could think of to get the proper driver to adjust a basic King head and never got anywhere. I think you need to wait around a shop until the old guy dies and then grab his. -Robert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can GPS be *too* accurate? Do I need some XTE?? | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 82 | November 22nd 04 08:01 PM |
Can GPS be *too* accurate? Do I need some XTE?? | Icebound | Piloting | 80 | November 22nd 04 08:01 PM |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
How accurate was B-26 bombing? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 59 | March 3rd 04 10:10 PM |
Local TV News ran an accurate story about airframe icing last night | Peter R. | Piloting | 5 | January 29th 04 01:01 AM |