![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
Dave Butler wrote in : Peter Duniho wrote: "Magnus" wrote in message ... 91.173 states that you need an IFR flightplan and a clearance to operate IFR in controlled airspace. What if you only want to fly around IFR in G airspace for the entire flight? I don't see why you'd need to get a clearance void time or anything, you could just takeoff and fly around without talking to anyone. You are correct, there's no regulatory requirement to file a flight plan, or to have an ATC clearance, to operate IFR in Class G airspace. Whether this is *safe* to do so is open to debate. You would be very much relying on the "big sky" theory, along with hoping that no one else is doing the same thing you are. OK, I guess I have to jump in with my IFR in Class G story. Sorry if I've posted this before. I was in Manteo, NC (MQI) and wanted to go to Hatteras, NC (HSE). Both are located on the coast and the route can be chosen to be entirely over water, so that there's no concern about obstructions. On this day the ceiling was not a factor, but the visibility was below VFR minima, let's say 2-3 miles. That's not too unusual for a summer day in this part of the country. With that much visibility, I was able to keep the shoreline in sight for navigation. I also had a ham sandwich on board. I was in the Mooney, and I chose to operate with low power to keep the airspeed down. About 20 inchees gives me about 120 knots. The lower airspeed gave me a little more margin for see-and-avoid. I also broadcast my position from time to time on 122.9, as is the custom along the NC outer banks. I kept the landing light on. I happened to be alone, and I think if I'd had passengers, that would have been a factor in the go/no-go decision. I'm willing to take on a little more risk when I'm alone. I guess I could have filed a VFR flight plan, but I didn't on this occasion. Seems a little odd to file a VFR flight plan for a flight that's not in VFR conditions, but that would have given me SAR if I had needed it. The trip was uneventful, and I'd do it again without hesitation, given the same conditions. I am not sure if I understand. 2-3 mile visibility is VFR in class G. Quite so. This was also pointed out by Bob Moore. The whole thread was a brain-fart on my part. You may now resume your normal r.a.i programming. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Cananian airspace | Mike Rapoport | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | June 29th 04 08:20 PM |
most of eastern Massachussetts airspace closed in July | Christopher C. Stacy | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | June 19th 04 12:47 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Special Use Airspace on GPS | Jeff Doran | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 11th 03 01:23 PM |