![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember a recent discussion with a pilot mate where I was mentioning
how illogical a crash-shortly-after-takeoff is, given that beyond V1 takeoff can safely be continued even with just one good engine. I'd even told him that if I saw an aircraft airborne following takeoff, I'd presume it safe. Days after that tete-a-tete, a Fokker went down in Pakistan shortly after taking off. And today the Bombardier at Kentucky. Doesn't add up, does it? After all, if the engines are good and there's no bomb going off, it should be pretty hard to crash an aircraft! Ramapriya |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Approaches and takeoff mins. | jamin3508 | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | September 14th 05 02:51 AM |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Overweight takeoff / flight | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 50 | December 3rd 03 11:53 PM |