![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps this is a naive question, but: Why don't voice radio
communications for aviation use FM radio instead of AM radio? I realize there's substantial inertia in the installed base of AM equipment, but surely one could allocate some new frequencies to FM and use them in parallel for some years to ease the transition. The reason I ask is that improper and misunderstood radio communication is a leading cause of accidents, and so it seems that anything that can make that communication clearer would greatly improve safety. I can barely understand what I hear on the radio. It is true that the communication is very standardized, making it easier to guess what is being said, but the results are pretty unpleasant if one guesses wrong. On a related note, it has occurred to me that one could develop voice-recognition systems that understand the speech of a pilot and then repronounce what he says in an extremely standard synthetic voice. This could also improve understanding, especially for non-Anglophone pilots who speak with heavy accents. The same systems could clean up the speech so that it is absolutely standard, with no missing or added words. Of course, the issue here is that the system would be stuck if it cannot recognize what is being said, or if a completely non-standard utterance is made by the pilot. A natural extension of this would be systems that recognize standard phrases in one language and translate them to another, but that would be even more dangerous if the system ever failed. Still another idea is special training systems that listen to a pilot's speech and transcribe it, and point out any problems with understandability. Again, this would be most useful for non-Anglophone pilots, but it would work for anyone. If a machine can understand a pilot's speech clearly, then a human being should certainly be able to understand it that much more easily. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
AirCraft Radio Communications | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 13th 03 12:48 AM |