![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is it legal for a non-instrument rated pilot to file IFR in his own name in order to undergo instrument training while accompanied by his CFII ? In other words. Who should file IFR for a training instrument flight ? The student or the CFII ? Thanks for input -- Roy Piper Archer N5804F |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
"Roy N5804F" wrote: Is it legal for a non-instrument rated pilot to file IFR in his own name in order to undergo instrument training while accompanied by his CFII ? In other words. Who should file IFR for a training instrument flight ? The student or the CFII ? Thanks for input If you are not instrument rated, current, etc, it's not legal for you to act as PIC under IFR. You can file the flight plan (i.e. type it into DUATS, dictate it to FSS on the phone, etc) but put your instructor's name down in the PIC box. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy N5804F wrote:
Is it legal for a non-instrument rated pilot to file IFR in his own name in order to undergo instrument training while accompanied by his CFII ? In other words. Who should file IFR for a training instrument flight ? The student or the CFII ? Thanks for input There is no prohibition on who can file. The ONLY issue is that the flight plan MUST bear the name (by regulation) of the pilot in command which can't be the student. This gets sticky on DUAT (at least the GTE one) because they always insert the registered user's name in the PIC field. I filed my instructor's name via FSS when I was doing my training. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Make sure that the CFII knows you are filing flight plans
with his name. It is the customary practice, but just be sure that the actual filing and plan is seen by the CFII/PIC before you file. "Ron Natalie" wrote in message m... | Roy N5804F wrote: | | Is it legal for a non-instrument rated pilot to file IFR in his own name in | order to undergo instrument training while accompanied by his CFII ? | In other words. | Who should file IFR for a training instrument flight ? The student or the | CFII ? | | Thanks for input | | | There is no prohibition on who can file. The ONLY issue is that the | flight plan MUST bear the name (by regulation) of the pilot in command | which can't be the student. This gets sticky on DUAT (at least the | GTE one) because they always insert the registered user's name in | the PIC field. | | I filed my instructor's name via FSS when I was doing my training. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
Make sure that the CFII knows you are filing flight plans with his name. It is the customary practice, but just be sure that the actual filing and plan is seen by the CFII/PIC before you file. Yes, this was done with the concurrence of the instructor. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/28/2006 04:47 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article et, "Roy N5804F" wrote: Is it legal for a non-instrument rated pilot to file IFR in his own name in order to undergo instrument training while accompanied by his CFII ? In other words. Who should file IFR for a training instrument flight ? The student or the CFII ? Thanks for input If you are not instrument rated, current, etc, it's not legal for you to act as PIC under IFR. You can file the flight plan (i.e. type it into DUATS, dictate it to FSS on the phone, etc) but put your instructor's name down in the PIC box. That's interesting. During my training, I filed the IFR flight plans (based on my CFII's direction) and used my name. I did always put "Instrument Training Flight" in the Remarks box, but this isn't the same thing. I guess that's another thing my instructor didn't really understand ;-( -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
That's interesting. During my training, I filed the IFR flight plans (based on my CFII's direction) and used my name. I did always put "Instrument Training Flight" in the Remarks box, but this isn't the same thing. I did the same except I didn't bother with the remark. Nothing was ever said that I did it incorrectly or illegally. I suspect the FAA figured out the nature of the flight which had numerous approaches but only one landing. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Technically the name on the flight plan must be that of the PIC, which
in this case is the CFII. However, I doubt that anyone would care whose name is on the flight plan as long as there is a qualified PIC in the cockpit. Just the same as ATC does not care what you use for navigation as long as you fly your clearance. The only time a question would arise is in case of an accident or emergency. In those cases it would not matter whose name was on the flight plan. The presumed PIC will be at fault. In the case of a dual flight, the CFI is the presumed PIC even if he was not actively instructing. Roy N5804F wrote: Is it legal for a non-instrument rated pilot to file IFR in his own name in order to undergo instrument training while accompanied by his CFII ? In other words. Who should file IFR for a training instrument flight ? The student or the CFII ? Thanks for input -- Roy Piper Archer N5804F |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well thanks to all for the input so far. The consensus seems to be that an instrument student cannot file an IFR plan in his own name. The basis of that opinion seems to hinge on who is PIC. I am not sure, but I think that electronic filing via AOPA flight planner would not give you any opportunity to use other than your own name ? So maybe all filing would have to be done via the telephone or radio. Roy "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message ups.com... Technically the name on the flight plan must be that of the PIC, which in this case is the CFII. However, I doubt that anyone would care whose name is on the flight plan as long as there is a qualified PIC in the cockpit. Just the same as ATC does not care what you use for navigation as long as you fly your clearance. The only time a question would arise is in case of an accident or emergency. In those cases it would not matter whose name was on the flight plan. The presumed PIC will be at fault. In the case of a dual flight, the CFI is the presumed PIC even if he was not actively instructing. Roy N5804F wrote: Is it legal for a non-instrument rated pilot to file IFR in his own name in order to undergo instrument training while accompanied by his CFII ? In other words. Who should file IFR for a training instrument flight ? The student or the CFII ? Thanks for input -- Roy Piper Archer N5804F |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy N5804F wrote:
The consensus seems to be that an instrument student cannot file an IFR plan in his own name. Let's be precise. The instrument student may file all the flight plans he cares to. He just can't accept a clearance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Dumb Reg question | John Gaquin | Piloting | 67 | May 4th 05 04:54 AM |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |