![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I appreciate eveyone's input. I sense that there is no clearcut answer.
The stepdown minimums are obviously there for a reason. On the other hand, one would be allowed to fly a descent path of one owns choosing when a visual approach clearance is issued. The controller is often not aware if one is flying in IMC or VMC. What is one to do on a approach when you have stepped down into VMC conditions and the controller yells out an altitude and terrain alert? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depends...
If you are on a visual approach, tell him "terrain in sight, but thank you for asking." If you are on a published (non-visual) IFR approach (IMC or VMC), and... (1) you are in IMC, and below the MDA or step down, get above the published altitude immediately. (2) try reducing your descent rate as you approach the MDA or step down alt; ie go to 500 fpm for the last 300ft. You will set off few if any terrain alerts that way, as opposed to driving right down at 1000 fpm and then levelling off in the last 100ft. Make sure you do not descend out of the MDA towards a landing, even with the ry in sight, unless you have reached the VDP if one is published, or reached your own (calculated) VDP if one is not published. Calculate your own VDP as follows: Take the HAT, and divide by 10. ie, if HAT = 400, HAT/10 = 40 Set the time from the FAF to the MAP into your timer, such that it will count down to and reach 0 at the MAP. Your VDP is when the timer shows HAT/10 seconds left. ie, HAT = 400, HAT/10 = 40; do NOT descend out of the MDA until the timer reads :40 or less. Gene CFII, MEI, ASC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you are on a published (non-visual) IFR approach (IMC or VMC),
and... (1) you are in IMC, and below the MDA or step down, get above the published altitude immediately. What if you are now in VMC on a stepdown fix and below the published minimum for that stepdown, prior to the FAF? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK... 1st, stepdown fixes are after the FAF... they are between the FAF
and the MAP. The only IFR altitude that your are allowed to go below on an IFR flight plan is the MDA or DA, and then only after you have the three requirements satisfied as specd in FAR 91.175. There is no provision for going below a step-down fix under an IFR flight plan... VMC or IMC. Gene |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what is MBS approach and please quote me the FAR this opinion is based
upon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jan 2005 22:56:49 -0800, "hsm" wrote:
I appreciate eveyone's input. I sense that there is no clearcut answer. The stepdown minimums are obviously there for a reason. On the other hand, one would be allowed to fly a descent path of one owns choosing when a visual approach clearance is issued. The controller is often not aware if one is flying in IMC or VMC. What is one to do on a approach when you have stepped down into VMC conditions and the controller yells out an altitude and terrain alert? Say "Roger" Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jan 2005 22:56:49 -0800, "hsm" wrote:
I appreciate eveyone's input. I sense that there is no clearcut answer. The stepdown minimums are obviously there for a reason. On the other hand, one would be allowed to fly a descent path of one owns choosing when a visual approach clearance is issued. The controller is often not aware if one is flying in IMC or VMC. What is one to do on a approach when you have stepped down into VMC conditions and the controller yells out an altitude and terrain alert? If you are legally below the charted altitude, which means you have the runway in sight and are making a normal approach, then I would say "Roger" (after double checking to be sure that everything was OK). But I've gotten low altitude alerts on occasion even when on a glide path (needles centered). I am told you can also trigger the alert by descending more rapidly than the computer thinks you should (on a non-precision approach) -- this may be OK for a transport category jet aircraft, and not necessarily applicable to a small Part 91 CAT A a/c. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:12:39 -0500, Ron Rosenfeld
wrote: But I've gotten low altitude alerts on occasion even when on a glide path (needles centered). I am told you can also trigger the alert by descending more rapidly than the computer thinks you should (on a non-precision approach) -- this may be OK for a transport category jet aircraft, and not necessarily applicable to a small Part 91 CAT A a/c. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) True. Often with approaches where the nav facility is on the field and there is no FAF. You can get to minimums pretty far out and usually set off the computer alarms. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
descent below minimums | hsm | Instrument Flight Rules | 82 | January 11th 05 06:33 PM |
Landing Gear Parts, Antique Part, EXP Airplane Auction | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 04 05:11 PM |
Stiffness of finished Carbon Fiber part | RKT | Home Built | 3 | April 8th 04 02:00 PM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |
CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |