![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When flying a plane that doesn't have a lot of climbing power, is it
quicker to get to your destination if you climb at a slower rate, but faster speed? Or is it quicker if you climb faster to your altitude? For example, say I took off at sea level and want to cruise at 6,500. I don't need to be that high for terrain clearance for some time. In a fixed pitch plane, I could climb at Vy to get to the altitude using full throttle, but this gives lesser engine cooling. If I climb at a speed greater than Vy, I'll need to reduce the throttle more (fixed pitch) to keep RPMs in range. When I do this, it seems like it'll take forever to get to the altitude, however. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Step climbs | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 56 | March 2nd 07 05:17 PM |
ASW 19b performance | Jim Crowhurst | Soaring | 1 | July 8th 05 01:31 PM |
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance | R.T. | Owning | 22 | July 6th 04 08:04 AM |
Climbs, Descents, and Approaches | pdxflyer | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | March 7th 04 01:37 AM |
Climbs and Descents | pdxflyer | Piloting | 0 | March 1st 04 07:17 AM |