![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is an (ICAO) step climb?
-- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() What is an (ICAO) step climb? Check the Sim Groups, the answer is the http://tinyurl.com/373ecy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 7:56 am, Judah wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote innews ![]() What is an (ICAO) step climb? Check the Sim Groups, the answer is the http://tinyurl.com/373ecy Google works pretty well too |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 In rec.aviation.piloting Kingfish wrote: On Feb 27, 7:56 am, Judah wrote: Mxsmanic wrote innews ![]() What is an (ICAO) step climb? Check the Sim Groups, the answer is the http://tinyurl.com/373ecy Google works pretty well too But we already know that Mx won't do a search anywhere for documentation that clearly define things such as this, even if they come from the governing body whose jurisdiction that question is under. Also, even if we give him links to the documentation, he questions the links let alone argues that the documentation is wrong. The Dilbert Rule applies: "Never argue with an idiot. They'll drop you down to their level, then beat you with experience." Definitely applies to Mx. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF5IROyBkZmuMZ8L8RAjYeAKCLIpjKbXHsJ/7+r+qZnf7/eTTHsACg6Ev6 lOhFrZQTPaVxXCDPMn3MTYY= =k5Ev -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah writes:
Check the Sim Groups, the answer is the http://tinyurl.com/373ecy Thanks! The explanation of Concorde operations is particularly interesting. I guess there are more airline pilots on the sim groups. I can see why tin-can pilots wouldn't know anything about step climbs. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 4:22 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Judah writes: Check the Sim Groups, the answer is the http://tinyurl.com/373ecy Thanks! The explanation of Concorde operations is particularly interesting. I guess there are more airline pilots on the sim groups. I can see why tin-can pilots wouldn't know anything about step climbs. And, by default, sim-only pilots would know even less? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote Thanks! The explanation of Concorde operations is particularly interesting. I guess there are more airline pilots on the sim groups. I can see why tin-can pilots wouldn't know anything about step climbs. Fer cryin' out loud, it's "spam can" you knucklehead! Reminds me of a guy at work who always says "it's a tough road to hoe". BDS |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kingfish writes:
And, by default, sim-only pilots would know even less? No. The people who know most about flying jet airliners are the pilots of those airliners. But sim pilots of jet airliners are likely to know a lot more about them than real-world pilots who fly only tin cans. Airliners are a whole different world, and it is clear that many pilots here have never gone anywhere near that world. Some of their comments about flying reveal how little they know about other types of flying besides their own. In many respects, a PC simulator is closer to a real airliner than a small GA aircraft is. Someone who is familiar only with the latter is thus at a disadvantage when it comes to discussing many aspects of flying large aircraft. And the reason for more airline pilots simming is easy enough to understand. Pilots of large airliners naturally tend to enjoy flying them, but they can't possibly afford to buy one of their own. So a good compromise is to use a simulator. If they need the wind in their hair, they can fly a tin can, but if they want to enjoy the procedural and other aspects of flying an airliner, they don't have much choice other than simulation. The best simulations on a PC, though, are now pretty good, better than many here seem to realize. This is especially true if you are not a thrillseeker and you don't need the wind in your hair or the threat of death to be happy. (I certainly hope that there aren't too many airline pilots who fly because they are afraid of dying!) -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDS writes:
Fer cryin' out loud, it's "spam can" you knucklehead! Spam can, tin can ... whatever. Any aircraft that you can tow by hand. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
BDS writes: Fer cryin' out loud, it's "spam can" you knucklehead! Spam can, tin can ... whatever. Any aircraft that you can tow by hand. Anthony, you're so clueless that you can't even use a mild insult correctly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diana-2 : next step | Yurek | Soaring | 7 | June 20th 05 07:29 PM |
Flying on the step? | [email protected] | Piloting | 30 | November 3rd 04 01:06 AM |
Step-up Planning | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 24 | October 4th 04 04:04 AM |
Climbs, Descents, and Approaches | pdxflyer | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | March 7th 04 01:37 AM |
Climbs and Descents | pdxflyer | Piloting | 0 | March 1st 04 07:17 AM |