![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Hilton |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:34:53 GMT, "Hilton" wrote:
1. Go on a diet 2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Hilton It's valid, or at least more accurate that the traditional 6 lbs/gal. Fuel specific density probably varies between manufacturers, but is usually specified as 0.7 or 0.71, which is about 5.84 lbs/gal. You need to carry a lot of fuel for this difference to amount to anything useful. I'll keep using the more conservative "6", ... and start dieting - Tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hilton wrote:
1. Go on a diet 2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so. Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is what it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago to simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't take time to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct, if more impractical for their pilots. Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
Hilton wrote: 1. Go on a diet 2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so. Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is what it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago to simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't take time to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct, if more impractical for their pilots. Matt For 50 gallons of fuel the difference is 9 pounds. Not much of a difference as most peoples weight can change 4 pounds in a day based on time of day and water in/out |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt,
According to Wikipedia: "Avgas has a density of 6.02 lb/US gallon at 15 °C". Not sure how 'correct' this is. Hilton "Matt Whiting" wrote in message news ![]() Hilton wrote: 1. Go on a diet 2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so. Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is what it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago to simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't take time to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct, if more impractical for their pilots. Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 2, 8:54 am, "Hilton" wrote:
Matt, According to Wikipedia: "Avgas has a density of 6.02 lb/US gallon at 15 °C". Not sure how 'correct' this is. One of the material data sheets at Shell's website says their 100LL is 0.718 kg/L at 15 C. http://www.shell.com/static/au-en/do..._100ll_pds.pdf 0.72 kg/L is 6.02 lb/US gallon. I guess it depends on how "exact" you want your calcs to be. I mean, come on, do you actually weigh yourself before you do each and every w&b calc? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:23:23 GMT, Tom L.
wrote: You need to carry a lot of fuel for this difference to amount to anything useful. In the Cub, it would allow me to gain 2 pounds, or not to lose 2 pounds, as the case might be. Every little bit helps! Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 from HarperCollins on August 21 www.flyingtigersbook.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Theune wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: Hilton wrote: 1. Go on a diet 2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6 lbs - Mooney did it. Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it? Yes, diets are completely legal and valid and most of us should do so. Mooney didn't "define" a gallon of 100LL to weight 5.82 lbs, that is what it DOES weigh. Someone else "defined" it as 6 lbs many moons ago to simplify calculations. If Mooney is doing as you say (I didn't take time to verify), then they are just being more precisely correct, if more impractical for their pilots. Matt For 50 gallons of fuel the difference is 9 pounds. Not much of a difference as most peoples weight can change 4 pounds in a day based on time of day and water in/out I didn't say it made much of a difference, just that it is valid. Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hilton wrote:
Matt, According to Wikipedia: "Avgas has a density of 6.02 lb/US gallon at 15 °C". Not sure how 'correct' this is. I've seen several different values, but most are less than 6.00 lbs/gal. According to this site, the specific gravity of ConocoPhillips 100LL is 0.7. http://www.conocophillips.co.uk/NR/r...D7/0/msds6.pdf According to this site, the density of water at 15.5C is 8.33727 lbs/gal. http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/se...r-density.html Multiplying that by 0.7 yields: 5.836 lb/gal for the 100LL. I can't vouch for the calculator site, but I trust the ConocoPhillips MSDS much more than anything on Wikipedia, which is about the least reliable source on the internet in my experience. Matt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:08:46 -0400, Cubdriver usenet AT danford DOT
net wrote: Every little bit helps! That's why most FBOs have public bathrooms. "All passengers must "evacuate" before boarding." G |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Server over-load | Jim Macklin | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 17th 06 01:48 AM |
New 182T, where's the useful load?? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 10 | April 27th 06 06:48 PM |
Bush went to war to raise oil prices. | Garamondextended | Military Aviation | 6 | May 29th 04 02:24 AM |
Load supervisers | jfp | Piloting | 0 | April 13th 04 04:25 PM |
Load supervisers | jfp | General Aviation | 0 | April 13th 04 04:22 PM |