![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://tinyurl.com/2mz2y9
Upper right corner. Note the age of the NEXRAD vs. the age of the XM lightning. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 21, 8:59 am, "Dan Luke" wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2mz2y9 I can't access the image - would you provide the info directly? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it has something to do with how the picture is compiled. See:
http://www.flyingmag.com/article.asp...age_numb er=1 Since the radar sweeps take time (20 seconds for each 360 deg sweep) and multiple are needed (14) to get a full vertical picture, it takes about 5 minutes for a complete volume scan. Being a "system" involving many possible points of failure (not necessarily catastrophic, sometimes just hiccups) a delay of 17 minutes seems to be entirely possible albeit uncommon. The good thing is that it's kind enough to show its age ![]() Marco "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/2mz2y9 Upper right corner. Note the age of the NEXRAD vs. the age of the XM lightning. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul kgyy" wrote: I can't access the image - would you provide the info directly? For some reason, the direct link has quit working. Try this one and go to the bottom of the page: http://rides.webshots.com/album/559437187xuvaYf |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Airbus" wrote: For the entire world outside the US, including all of Europe, NEXRAD is still 15-20 years in the future . . . Believe me, I'm grateful to have it. What do you do for EADS? -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://tinyurl.com/2mz2y9 Upper right corner. Note the age of the NEXRAD vs. the age of the XM lightning. According to various people on the Cessna Pilots Ass'n forums, it's a bug that crept in wiyh a redesign of the G1000's GDL69/69A XM receiver module. Garmin is working on a fix. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-08-21, Dan Luke wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2mz2y9 That's my old stamping ground - used to use Beaumont for instrument training since they have virtually every approach known to mankind :-) A bit OT for this thread, but I heard the Trinity VOR burned down recently - did they replace it? I notice it's depicted on your moving map. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dylan Smith" wrote: A bit OT for this thread, but I heard the Trinity VOR burned down recently - did they replace it? I notice it's depicted on your moving map. There was nothing in the NOTAMs about it. I never tuned it in. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
old NEXRAD | Dan Luke[_2_] | Piloting | 10 | August 27th 07 03:38 PM |
sferics vs Nexrad | Jose | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | August 18th 06 03:33 AM |
Shot at/Shot back | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 33 | March 11th 04 07:53 PM |