![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In many airports out there, you'll find in the AFD in the comments
section, "No touch and go landings", and/or "no practice approaches". A few examples off the top of my head: http://airnav.com/airport/ksac http://airnav.com/airport/kcpm What exactly is meant by this? No touch and go landings period, or just don't do multiple touch and go's, as in buzzing around the pattern for an hour? It seems kind of weird to me that an airport would totally not allow touch and go landings. I can understand not allowing multiple touch and go's, as they create a lot of noise, negatively effect arrivals and departures, and generally can be a big nuisance. Compared to a full stop/taxi back, a touch and go is more efficient, arguably less noisy, and less of a burden on other traffic (how many times have you had to go around because some joker had to taxi to the next taxiway?) Is there something I'm missing? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Touch Down | Maple1 | Aviation Photos | 1 | August 3rd 07 05:12 PM |
Touch Down | Maple1 | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 3rd 07 04:53 AM |
DEN touch n go without a fee? | Ron Lee | Piloting | 22 | September 3rd 06 09:57 PM |
Are you gliding when you touch down? | John Doe | Piloting | 29 | January 23rd 05 12:52 AM |
Exterior touch-up | PaulH | Owning | 1 | June 12th 04 03:30 PM |