![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?g...21T60&kw=Flash
These are 0.4 m resolution pictures taken by satellite (GeoEye) since Fossett went missing. You're shown a picture and either you say "no, nothing of interest" or "yes, this should be checked out". There's over 100,000 images to sift through, so if you can help, please do! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 10, 5:55 am, Dan G wrote:
http://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?g...21T60&kw=Flash These are 0.4 m resolution pictures taken by satellite (GeoEye) since Fossett went missing. You're shown a picture and either you say "no, nothing of interest" or "yes, this should be checked out". There's over 100,000 images to sift through, so if you can help, please do! Dan - What is the paint job on the missing Citabria ? Startburst ? Stripes ? Didn't see this info, perhaps it would help... Best Regards, Dave "YO" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 10, 12:19 pm, wrote:
Dan - What is the paint job on the missing Citabria ? Startburst ? Stripes ? Didn't see this info, perhaps it would help... Best Regards, Dave "YO" I honestly don't know, although I imagine it will be a light colour, similar to the example. However don't forget that if you flag anything as interesting the image is only sent on to the search team for a closer look. If they agree, then they may send someone to check it out. So risk of causing a troublesome "false positive" is low. I noticed that the images are hosted by Google. So we've got GeoEye, Google and Amazon all working together to make this possible. All that's now needed is people to look at the images! Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan G wrote:
http://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?g...21T60&kw=Flash These are 0.4 m resolution pictures taken by satellite (GeoEye) since Fossett went missing. You're shown a picture and either you say "no, nothing of interest" or "yes, this should be checked out". There's over 100,000 images to sift through, so if you can help, please do! Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen stuff like this when others went missing? Tony (yes, I am going through the images) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen stuff like this when others went missing? The idea came from this search-and-rescue mission http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/...?currentPage=1 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Verhulst wrote:
Dan G wrote: http://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?g...21T60&kw=Flash These are 0.4 m resolution pictures taken by satellite (GeoEye) since Fossett went missing. You're shown a picture and either you say "no, nothing of interest" or "yes, this should be checked out". There's over 100,000 images to sift through, so if you can help, please do! Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen stuff like this when others went missing? Obviously these companies don't get nearly as much free publicity if they did it for Bob Unknown. However, now that it's been done, I imagine it might become more common. The major cost is actually getting the satellite pictures, so if it's possible to get them while the satellite is otherwise idle and without burning its fuel then the total cost of such an operation might become low enough that it could be used routinely even for us little people. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 10, 3:19 pm, Michael Ash wrote:
However, now that it's been done, I imagine it might become more common. The major cost is actually getting the satellite pictures, so if it's possible to get them while the satellite is otherwise idle and without burning its fuel then the total cost of such an operation might become low enough that it could be used routinely even for us little people. TBH I don't know how effective this method of "searching" will prove. As is linked to above, the prototype of this method was the search for a Microsoft employee who sailed out of San Francisco and was never seen again (I worked on that one too). Although a number of yachts of the right size were sighted in the images, they proved not to be the Tenacious and Gray was never found. (Gray and the Tenacious are still out there, somewhere, probably on the seabed by now). You can read the blog that was used to co-ordinate the satellite search: http://www.openphi.net/tenacious/ The Fossett search is only the second attempt to use the technique and is looking for a very different target on a very different surface, so who knows if it will prove worthwhile. While the aircraft is easily big enough to be visible to the satellite, indeed an airborne search plane has already been spotted, it's not a guaranteed success. Maybe the Citabria burned up on impact, or is obscured from the vertical somehow. Maybe it's not there at all. What is true, without doubt, is that a full conventional SAR operation is launched for *anyone* who goes missing in an aircraft or boat, whether rich or poor, or famous or not, and that's still a person's best hope for timely rescue. Dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan G" wrote in message ups.com... http://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?g...21T60&kw=Flash These are 0.4 m resolution pictures taken by satellite (GeoEye) since Fossett went missing. You're shown a picture and either you say "no, nothing of interest" or "yes, this should be checked out". There's over 100,000 images to sift through, so if you can help, please do! Probably my ineptness, but the flash application doesn't work. I get a Google Earth view of the Lat, Long starting point on Google Earth but no opportunity to designate an image as interesting. I also don't get a predictable way to shift to the next image. I've tried with both IE and Firefox. Bill Daniels |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Never mind, it's now working - not sure what I did no make it so.
Bill Daniels "Dan G" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 10, 3:19 pm, Michael Ash wrote: However, now that it's been done, I imagine it might become more common. The major cost is actually getting the satellite pictures, so if it's possible to get them while the satellite is otherwise idle and without burning its fuel then the total cost of such an operation might become low enough that it could be used routinely even for us little people. TBH I don't know how effective this method of "searching" will prove. As is linked to above, the prototype of this method was the search for a Microsoft employee who sailed out of San Francisco and was never seen again (I worked on that one too). Although a number of yachts of the right size were sighted in the images, they proved not to be the Tenacious and Gray was never found. (Gray and the Tenacious are still out there, somewhere, probably on the seabed by now). You can read the blog that was used to co-ordinate the satellite search: http://www.openphi.net/tenacious/ The Fossett search is only the second attempt to use the technique and is looking for a very different target on a very different surface, so who knows if it will prove worthwhile. While the aircraft is easily big enough to be visible to the satellite, indeed an airborne search plane has already been spotted, it's not a guaranteed success. Maybe the Citabria burned up on impact, or is obscured from the vertical somehow. Maybe it's not there at all. What is true, without doubt, is that a full conventional SAR operation is launched for *anyone* who goes missing in an aircraft or boat, whether rich or poor, or famous or not, and that's still a person's best hope for timely rescue. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Steve Fossett search | Don Pyeatt | Aviation Photos | 9 | September 11th 07 06:16 PM |
Steve Fossett | NoneYa | Piloting | 32 | September 11th 07 02:45 AM |
Steve Fossett | Brian Milner | Soaring | 3 | September 8th 07 08:26 AM |
Steve Fossett | [email protected] | Owning | 15 | September 7th 07 08:45 PM |