![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 14, 10:30*pm, wrote:
See: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Rayt...d_Anti_Submari... I supposed this is intented to counter the small mast-mounted IR SAMs that were on some of the Russian's Kilo's awhile back. I seem to recall that the Russians found that diving and hiding provided better survivability then trying to shoot town the ASW aircraft and abandonded the program. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 14, 11:30 pm, wrote:
See: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Rayt...d_Anti_Submari... To see what the comics version of a Fishhawk (aka an Osprey) is like http://www.comicspage.com/shoe/shoe_characters.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airyx wrote:
On May 14, 10:30 pm, wrote: See: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Rayt...d_Anti_Submari... I supposed this is intented to counter the small mast-mounted IR SAMs that were on some of the Russian's Kilo's awhile back. I seem to recall that the Russians found that diving and hiding provided better survivability then trying to shoot town the ASW aircraft and abandonded the program. I think this concept is being pushed because they don't want the twin-engined P-8 flying around at typical traditional torpedo launch altitudes. -- Philip Morten |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airyx wrote:
:On May 14, 10:30*pm, wrote: : See: : : http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Rayt...d_Anti_Submari... : What is the point of posting a quote of a link when you don't post the whole thing? : :I supposed this is intented to counter the small mast-mounted IR SAMs :that were on some of the Russian's Kilo's awhile back. : Don't suppose. -- You have never lived until you have almost died. Life has a special meaning that the protected will never know. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Philip Morten wrote:
:Airyx wrote: : On May 14, 10:30 pm, wrote: : See: : : http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Rayt...d_Anti_Submari... : : I supposed this is intented to counter the small mast-mounted IR SAMs : that were on some of the Russian's Kilo's awhile back. : : I seem to recall that the Russians found that diving and hiding : provided better survivability then trying to shoot town the ASW : aircraft and abandonded the program. : :I think this concept is being pushed because they don't want the :twin-engined P-8 flying around at typical traditional torpedo launch :altitudes. : The concept is being 'pushed' because flying down to a couple hundred feet off the water at dead slow speeds for a torpedo launch and then clawing your way back up to a reasonable search altitude is hard for the P-3, wears out the airframe, and makes it harder for them to do their job. The same is true for the P-8 in spades. -- "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard Shaw |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The same is true for the P-8 in spades.
Are you sure ? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 May 2008 15:33:44 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote: The concept is being 'pushed' because flying down to a couple hundred feet off the water at dead slow speeds for a torpedo launch and then clawing your way back up to a reasonable search altitude is hard for the P-3, wears out the airframe, and makes it harder for them to do their job. I dunno. I never found the P-3 had to "claw" it's way back to altitude. It climbed pretty good, as a matter of fact! :-) The descent and climb take time, fuel, and do increase airframe and engine stress to a degree, but not so's you'd notice under most circumstances. Smooth piloting does a lot to keep stresses down. Going down low does increase the risk of mishap and may expose the aircraft to AAW weapons on a sub or other surface vessels. Being able to conduct "stand off" attacks makes sense. In earlier days sensor limitations meant "low" attacks because A primary system to developing attack criteria was the MAD. Limitations in accoustic sensor accuracy and weapon aquisition profile required a pretty precise weapon placement. As accoustics and weapons have gotten better maybe MAD is less important. The same is true for the P-8 in spades. Don't know much about this bird, yet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It dices, it slices, it guts like a fish | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 13 | July 28th 07 07:17 PM |
It dices, it slices, it guts like a fish | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 3 | July 26th 07 10:45 PM |
Very Interesting Propeller Hub Fish Tank on EBAY | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | October 13th 06 08:29 PM |
Very Interesting Propeller Hub Fish Tank on EBAY | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | October 13th 06 08:28 PM |
Malaysian MiG-29s got trounced by RN Sea Harrier F/A2s in Exercise Flying Fish | KDR | Military Aviation | 29 | October 7th 03 06:30 PM |