![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not a frequent reader of rec.aviation.soaring, so at the risk of
asking a common question, I'll pose my question. I fly cross country here in the meaty middle (cheesy middle? ![]() often Minnesota, sometimes Iowa, Illinois, South Dakota, Michigan. I often land off-field (in 50 cross country flights, or attempts, I've landed off-field on 26 flights). While landing off-field seems to be a downside for some pilots, I take it as just a natural part of aggressively flying cross country. Of course, I fly in a part of the world where this is often possible. There are usually fields with low crops or cut hay fields in good abundance in this part of the US. And, for whatever reason, I've had very good experiences with farmers! I want to change ships. Presently, I fly a Schweizer 1-35. While I enjoy the heck out of flying this ship, and have it pimped out just right ![]() have reached max gross weight on the ship, and want to add more toys. For example, I want to take my ship out West to do some mountain flying, and thus need to add an O2 system. While some people decide to fly over max gross weight, I don't choose to do so. My budget is in the same range as the cost of a Schweizer 1-35 (around 20K US dollars). I don't particlarly feel the need to go up in L/D performance. My thought is while that would give me longer legs, my soaring enjoyment largely comes from challenging myself to the next longest flight in my current ship-- I don't see the need for more than 35:1 or so. I'd rather work on my skills than add L/D to my ship. I think a 15-meter ship is best for my flying. While there are many nice ships with longer spans, I have landed at relatively narrow private airfields. I don't know if a span winder than 15-m would fit. Plus, I often like to pull off of an asphalt runway, between landing lights, to give way to traffic. I'd rather not do that with longer wings. So, given this wing span (15-m), budget range (20K-ish), and this performance range (35:1-ish), and my frequency of landing off-field, and my need to have enough gross weight for a reasonable equipment load (normal glider instruments, plus transponder, dual batteries, off-field landing kit, O2 system, GPS etc) what's the best ship? My thoughts right now have put a priority on a T-tailed ship, and one that sits up really high on the gear. Perhaps I should state: top-wing-only dive brakes too. A T-tail ship should keep the horizontal stabilizer away from any crops, and the same rationale applies to the dive brakes. Having the ship sit up really high on the gear helps not only with the crop, but any furrows in the field, to reduce scraping on the buttom of the hull, and gear doors. Within my price range a Jantar Standard seems to fit these criteria. The DG-100/101 from what I've read, can be fitted with an extra large wheel. That might be a good option though, though I'm not sure how much larger that extra large wheel can be, and how much higher it makes the ship sit (I need to contact DG). Thoughts? Thanks, and Safe Soaring! Chris. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cross Country Sailplanes: In the Flatland | Chris Prince | Soaring | 4 | August 11th 09 08:00 PM |
Cross Country Sailplanes: In the Flatland | Chris Prince | Soaring | 15 | August 10th 09 04:38 PM |
Cross Country Sailplanes: In the Flatland | Chris Prince | Soaring | 0 | August 10th 09 04:45 AM |
Cross Country again! | Michelle | Piloting | 10 | August 6th 06 06:45 PM |