![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was looking on registry.faa.gov at one of the old guys around here
that used to give a lot of instruction. I haven't seen him around in a little while. I went to look him up to see if he has a medical. The FAA shows he has a medical but it says... "VALID FOR STUDENT PILOT PURPOSES ONLY." This guy is a commercial/CFI like the rest of us. I've never seen this before. Is this a "solo" only medical?? -Robert, CFI |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this a "solo" only medical??
Nah, this isn't a "solo" only medical (there's no such thing) and more than likely, it's an FAA screwup (seen it happen before). There are certain conditions that don't disqualify you if you can get a SODA. If you have a condition that will allow you to fly with a SODA but not otherwise, you get a medical such as above, do your training, do you solo flying, and when you take a checkride, you take it with the FAA (some FSDO's may designate it, but not that I have ever heard of) and you get your private and your SODA in one shot. I guess it could be that he developed such a condition and was issued this medical. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a friend that broke his leg. A year after the Dr said he was
100% back to normal, the FAA finally agreed to do a SODA ride with him (they wanted to just deny the medical). It was a pretty easy ride since he didn't have any change in use of the leg, but this is the FAA. The FSDO handed him a "temporary" medical that allowed him to take the ride since the pilot examiner isn't PIC. After only another 6 months, a real class III showed up without restriction. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTW: I saw this on another medical, what does this mean?? Does this
means it doesn't work as a class III??? Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 10/2004 NOT VALID FOR ANY CLASS AFTER. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen this one before. A friend had this restiction.
Basically, his situation was such that a prior medical condition caused the FAA to decide that he needed to renew his medical every year. So if he gets a 2nd class medical, it doesn't turn into a 3rd after the year. If he gets a 3rd class medical it expires at the end of 1 year and he has to redo the medical. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
standard process after any heart bypass surgery.. even if you never had a
heart attack.. BT wrote in message oups.com... I've seen this one before. A friend had this restiction. Basically, his situation was such that a prior medical condition caused the FAA to decide that he needed to renew his medical every year. So if he gets a 2nd class medical, it doesn't turn into a 3rd after the year. If he gets a 3rd class medical it expires at the end of 1 year and he has to redo the medical. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen this one before. A friend had this restiction.
Basically, his situation was such that a prior medical condition caused the FAA to decide that he needed to renew his medical every year. So if he gets a 2nd class medical, it doesn't turn into a 3rd after the year. If he gets a 3rd class medical it expires at the end of 1 year and he has to redo the medical. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly. I have a heart murmur and my AME was allowed to issue in the
office this time (providing cardiologist paperwork) with a restriction of no valid for any class after December 31, 2005. I don't need to make another trip to the AME until 2006 though. For my 2005 renewal I mail my information to the FAA and they in turn send me a new medical! -- Chris Ehlbeck, PP-ASEL "It's a license to learn, have fun and buy really expensive hamburgers." "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... BTW: I saw this on another medical, what does this mean?? Does this means it doesn't work as a class III??? Medical Class : Second Medical Date: 10/2004 NOT VALID FOR ANY CLASS AFTER. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen this one before. A friend had this restiction.
Basically, his situation was such that a prior medical condition caused the FAA to decide that he needed to renew his medical every year. So if he gets a 2nd class medical, it doesn't turn into a 3rd after the year. If he gets a 3rd class medical it expires at the end of 1 year and he has to redo the medical. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
"VALID FOR STUDENT PILOT PURPOSES ONLY." This guy is a commercial/CFI like the rest of us. I've never seen this before. Is this a "solo" only medical?? -Robert, CFI when you have a medical condition that prevents you from getting a medical right away but requires a SODA, your initial certificate does bear that mention; it allows you to do all of your training just like any other student, including solo; unlike what someone else mentioned in this thread it doesn't require you to do the checkride with a FAA inspector; the way it usually works is that by the time you get ready for the checkride, you schedule an appointment with one of the inspector of the local FSDO for a 'medical flight check'; not a checkride per se, the inspector just wants to see if you can operate the aircraft safely and does not go through the PTS (said inspector is briefed by the FAA beforehand about what needs to be checked, each person and condition being different; in my case, partial paralysis of my legs, the guy wanted to see how I'd handle the rudders (I eventually did two such medical flight checks, since the SODA I got the first time was valid for class-III only; I went through the same process to upgrade to a class-II; I'll go for another flight check when upgrading to a class-I eventually -- then I should be done :-) as in my case the medical condition is not evolutive and the SODA was issued without expiration date or requirement for recheck which is also possible); someone with, say, a prosthetic arm would be checked differently, etc. really a neat way of doing it; when I did my PPL(A) in England, it was far more complicated: no solo allowed during the training... i.e., all the solo requirements were done with an instructor (yeah... weird), and logged as P u/s (pilot under supervision); then, after the checkride was passed, I had to redo the solo requirements for real this time, before being allowed to carry passengers; a bit more cumbersome than the FAA approach (but then again the British CAA was one of the very rare European civil aviation authorities that would even consider giving me a chance to demonstrate what I could do). now, I suppose (not sure about this one, just guessing) that if you acquire the medical condition requiring a SODA while you already have a pilot certificate that you might end up -- after a fair bit of paper work -- with the same restriction on your certificate until you get the SODA (via a medical flight check); that's how I would explain what you saw. --Sylvain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sport Pilot inconsistency | frustrated flier | Piloting | 19 | September 10th 04 04:53 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |