![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although the technology is still pricy vs lead-acid batteries, the
power/weight/size vs cost equation is getting better. Anybody using lithium model airplane packs bundeled to produce 12 - 14 v @3 - 6 amps as a power source for their glider? (I have been looking at the duralite site ... I'm sure there are others.) http://www.duralitebatteries.com/batteries.html KiloKilo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Kochanski (KK)" wrote in message oups.com... Although the technology is still pricy vs lead-acid batteries, the power/weight/size vs cost equation is getting better. Anybody using lithium model airplane packs bundeled to produce 12 - 14 v @3 - 6 amps as a power source for their glider? (I have been looking at the duralite site ... I'm sure there are others.) http://www.duralitebatteries.com/batteries.html KiloKilo I've been watching this too. (The model airplane guys always seem to grab the latest technology and run with it.) The early Li-Po batteries had some problems with catching fire when charging but it's clear that the technology has come a long way in the last year. There are 14V Mil-Spec Li-Po packs that would be safer to use but the prices are still astronomical. There are also some 14.8V laptop computer battery packs that look interesting. One thing that worries me is that a freshly charged Li-Po "14.8V" pack will produce a no-load voltage over 16V. A lot of avionics specify that the maximum voltage is 16V. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
voltage regulator
williscomb |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WilLiscomb" wrote in message ... voltage regulator ...or just a forward-biased diode or three. Vaughn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WilLiscomb" wrote in message ... voltage regulator williscomb Hmmmm Build a 'better' battery so that you can dump power into a voltage regulator. Cute. Actually the forward biased semiconductor junction in the form of a diode is a much easier way to do things. Ian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tango4" wrote in message ... "WilLiscomb" wrote in message ... voltage regulator williscomb Hmmmm Build a 'better' battery so that you can dump power into a voltage regulator. Cute. Actually the forward biased semiconductor junction in the form of a diode is a much easier way to do things. Ian You could use a step-up switching regulator. This would, of course, have the minor drawback of eliminating the annual "6 or 7 cell" argument on RAS. Tim Ward |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:09:49 +0000 (UTC), tango4 wrote:
"WilLiscomb" wrote in message ... voltage regulator williscomb Hmmmm Build a 'better' battery so that you can dump power into a voltage regulator. Cute. Actually the forward biased semiconductor junction in the form of a diode is a much easier way to do things. Ian Only problem is that the voltage drop is also present at the end-of-charge point, thus losing the last 0.7v of possible battery voltage before things start working strangely. If you use a well designed switching regulator which can boost as well as buck, the voltage supplied to the instruments can be maintained in the ideal range until the battery is almost completely flat, and at an average efficiency of about 80%. AFAIK, complete discharge is not harmful to NiCd, Lithium types etc. It is harmful to lead acid batteries. Cheers, John G. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Giddy writes:
If you use a well designed switching regulator which can boost as well as buck, the voltage supplied to the instruments can be maintained in the ideal range until the battery is almost completely flat, and at an average efficiency of about 80%. With carefull design and construction, you can get over 95% efficient converters running from a 12v source. AFAIK, complete discharge is not harmful to NiCd, Lithium types etc. It is harmful to lead acid batteries. Full dischare of a NiCd *battery* is bad news, it is OK to fully discharge a single cell on its own though. Lead acids can be run totally flat, but must be put on charge imediatly or they `sulphate'. Don't know about the various Li batteries. -- Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd., +61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda. West Australia 6076 comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked. EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Kochanski (KK) wrote:
Although the technology is still pricy vs lead-acid batteries, the power/weight/size vs cost equation is getting better. Anybody using lithium model airplane packs bundeled to produce 12 - 14 v @3 - 6 amps as a power source for their glider? (I have been looking at the duralite site ... I'm sure there are others.) http://www.duralitebatteries.com/batteries.html Given the cost and careful charging requirements, I'm guessing the interest in these is to allow more amphours to be stuffed into the glider's original battery box? Eliminating the need for adding another box when you added a transponder/Ipaq/etc would maybe make the Li battery cost worthwhile. For example, from the Duralite site: The recommended safe charging procedure for all Li-ion & Li-Poly batteries is to charge them out of the aircraft in a fire proof area or container. Always be present during the charging cycle. Unplug the batteries from charger when charging cycle is complete. Yikes! I don't see any other advantages for gliders over the standard sealed lead/acid batteries, which are cheap and trouble free. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... Ken Kochanski (KK) wrote: Although the technology is still pricy vs lead-acid batteries, the power/weight/size vs cost equation is getting better. Anybody using lithium model airplane packs bundeled to produce 12 - 14 v @3 - 6 amps as a power source for their glider? (I have been looking at the duralite site ... I'm sure there are others.) http://www.duralitebatteries.com/batteries.html Given the cost and careful charging requirements, I'm guessing the interest in these is to allow more amphours to be stuffed into the glider's original battery box? Eliminating the need for adding another box when you added a transponder/Ipaq/etc would maybe make the Li battery cost worthwhile. For example, from the Duralite site: The recommended safe charging procedure for all Li-ion & Li-Poly batteries is to charge them out of the aircraft in a ?re proof area or container. Always be present during the charging cycle. Unplug the batteries from charger when charging cycle is complete. Yikes! I don't see any other advantages for gliders over the standard sealed lead/acid batteries, which are cheap and trouble free. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA Well, Li chemistry batteries have much better performance when it's cold than either lead, NiCd or NiMH. So that might be a consideration for those flying wave a lot. Tim Ward |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Batteries, charger for Yaesu handheld - NiCad or NiMH? | David Herman | Owning | 10 | November 7th 04 04:30 PM |
Disruptive Technology | Steelgtr62 | Home Built | 13 | October 24th 04 07:32 PM |
USA India Dual Use Technology Transfers | Ravi V Prasad | Military Aviation | 2 | April 13th 04 09:21 PM |
Soviet State Committee on Science and Technology | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 0 | November 8th 03 10:45 PM |
Science, technology highlighted at hearing | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 23rd 03 10:30 PM |