If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quickie Bay Area IFR Practice?
Hello,
My and my slow airplane are based at San Carlos, CA. Got up this morning, looked out the window - the whole bay is blanketed in coastal stratus. We get a lot of mornings like that. Having gotten the rating last year, it sure would be nice to keep proficient. The usual IFR practice run around here is to go out to the valley and do the Stockton-Tracy-Livermore loop. Or to go out to Watsonville/Monterey/Salinas. Either of these are a bit time consuming because you actually have to fly somewhere. I'm thinking of filing a pair of IFR flight plans - SQL to LVK and LVK-SQL. Or maybe even SQL-OAK,OAK-SQL OR SQL-HWD-SQL. Sort of an IFR version of pattern practice. Yielding the max practice per unit time & fuel. Any Bay Area locals doing such? Or is the airspace just way to busy to even contemplate it? - Jerry Kaidor ( ) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Have you tried just calling up clearance delivery "N1234, request local
IFR for multiple approaches at SQL and LVK". That's how we do it here in Temple Texas, but admittedly your airspace is a bit more crowded than ours -- Cheers, John Clonts Temple, Texas N7NZ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
John Clonts wrote:
Have you tried just calling up clearance delivery "N1234, request local IFR for multiple approaches at SQL and LVK". they'll probably laugh at you. SQL is right under the approach path of SFO. In fact no practice approaches are allowed there. So they might clear you for one but you'll be holding for 45 minutes each. But certainly coming back home it is fine and I've done it a number of times. LVK is fine. for the original poster, if you need a safety pilot let me know. Will trade my time for one beer at Izzy's per approach. The same goes for you if I need one. Gerald |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jerry wrote:
Hello, My and my slow airplane are based at San Carlos, CA. Got up this morning, looked out the window - the whole bay is blanketed in coastal stratus. We get a lot of mornings like that. Having gotten the rating last year, it sure would be nice to keep proficient. The usual IFR practice run around here is to go out to the valley and do the Stockton-Tracy-Livermore loop. Or to go out to Watsonville/Monterey/Salinas. Either of these are a bit time consuming because you actually have to fly somewhere. I'm thinking of filing a pair of IFR flight plans - SQL to LVK and LVK-SQL. Or maybe even SQL-OAK,OAK-SQL OR SQL-HWD-SQL. Sort of an IFR version of pattern practice. Yielding the max practice per unit time & fuel. Any Bay Area locals doing such? Or is the airspace just way to busy to even contemplate it? - Jerry Kaidor ( ) There's good reason those are the standard IFR practice routes for the bay. They are low traffic, and they both have cruddy weather, even when other parts of the bay are CAVU. I am personally not fond of the LVK route, because its no radar, busy, and typically more clearer than stockton. My instructor likes MRY, I like stockton. Crappy weather, radar, and lots of open flat space. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jerry,
It's been a few years since I flew down to San Jose to watch your first solo. Good to here that flying is keeping you young. Now about Bay Area IFR practice. I like to begin at South County since that makes a cross-country. We do a pop-up into San Jose and once in contact with the tower request tower enroute to Palo Alto. Easy flight straight out 30 and make left turn direct Palo Alto. (Never went into San Carlos so can't say procedure) When in contact with Palo Alto Tower request tower en route to Hayward. When cleared we get radar vectors into Hayward. When in contact with tower request low approach and tower en route to Oakland. The clearance takes you to the left circiling Haward and intercepting ILS into Oakland. When in contact with tower request published missed with hold at Pieer (sp) then ask NorCal for tower enroute to CCR or APC. Should you land at Napa (APC) you will need to file with FSS. Personally I depart SVFR, contact Travis and get theLDA into Concord. Interesting element of flight is that it approximates the same amount of time taken VFR. Side item: FAA is working on an ILS 36 approach into Napa. Gene Whitt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Speaking of quickie IFR practice... well, not so much real varied practice, but a cheap way to stay legally current... I fly out of Palo Alto and just yesterday did a bunch of approaches into Moffet Field. Moffett is closed to public traffic, so you can't actually land, but you can fly the approaches. I flew the ILS 28R and LOC-only for about 6 approaches in a bit more than one hour. You're flying totally pilot nav, so you're responsible for getting back to the IAF (or less far if you want to start closer in) on your own (here's where a safety pilot is good for "vectors"). I was amazed at how quickly I could get a bunch of shots in, and its nice to have an ILS so close to home. I'm even going to consider it in the future as an alternative to get into PAO. (Shoot the NUQ ILS and then scud over to PAO) One major caveat: The missed approach is based off NUQ -- a TACAN. That means no course guidance -- though DME works. If you were to fly this for real, you'll *need* a different plan for your missed. However, as VFR practice, you can make up another fix. Minor caveat: You'll see these approaches in the gov't plates, but not in the Jepps unless you get the military subscription. Anyway, kinda cool. -- dave j Jerry wrote: Hello, My and my slow airplane are based at San Carlos, CA. Got up this morning, looked out the window - the whole bay is blanketed in coastal stratus. We get a lot of mornings like that. Having gotten the rating last year, it sure would be nice to keep proficient. The usual IFR practice run around here is to go out to the valley and do the Stockton-Tracy-Livermore loop. Or to go out to Watsonville/Monterey/Salinas. Either of these are a bit time consuming because you actually have to fly somewhere. I'm thinking of filing a pair of IFR flight plans - SQL to LVK and LVK-SQL. Or maybe even SQL-OAK,OAK-SQL OR SQL-HWD-SQL. Sort of an IFR version of pattern practice. Yielding the max practice per unit time & fuel. Any Bay Area locals doing such? Or is the airspace just way to busy to even contemplate it? - Jerry Kaidor ( ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Patrick AFB, NASA-KSC Area Log - Tuesday 09 March 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | March 10th 04 06:15 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Looking for practice area outside HPN | journeyman | Piloting | 7 | July 20th 03 01:59 AM |