![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of our local pilots misunderstood a common Notam, as shown below.
He thought the "ADD: From Shelby to RW 17: 3.52 degrees" meant add 3.52 degrees to the final approach course. How reasonable do you think his interpretation? (BTW, the notam just adds a descent gradient to a NP approach.) FDC 3/0143 M01 FI/T GENERAL DEWITT SPAIN, MEMPHIS, TN. VOR RWY 16, ORIG...CHANGE ALL REFERENCES TO RWY 16/34 TO RWY 17/35. ADD: FROM SHLBY TO RW 17: 3.52 DEGREES, TCH 31. ADD NOTE: VGSI AND DESCENT ANGLES NOT COINCIDENT. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2003-12-01 09:49:46 -0800, Greg Esres said:
One of our local pilots misunderstood a common Notam, as shown below. He thought the "ADD: From Shelby to RW 17: 3.52 degrees" meant add 3.52 degrees to the final approach course. How reasonable do you think his interpretation? (BTW, the notam just adds a descent gradient to a NP approach.) I can see where one might interpret it that way. But what the "ADD" means is that you should ADD that note to the chart. That 3.52 degrees is the "glide path" angle from SHLBY to the missed approach point. If there was a change to the final approach course, that would have been explicitly stated. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gotta agree with Larry. The whole thing smacks of vertical descent path, not
lateral alignment. Poorly written, for sure. Should at least have had quotation marks surrounding the phrase between "From" and "degrees." Bob Gardner "Greg Esres" wrote in message ... One of our local pilots misunderstood a common Notam, as shown below. He thought the "ADD: From Shelby to RW 17: 3.52 degrees" meant add 3.52 degrees to the final approach course. How reasonable do you think his interpretation? (BTW, the notam just adds a descent gradient to a NP approach.) FDC 3/0143 M01 FI/T GENERAL DEWITT SPAIN, MEMPHIS, TN. VOR RWY 16, ORIG...CHANGE ALL REFERENCES TO RWY 16/34 TO RWY 17/35. ADD: FROM SHLBY TO RW 17: 3.52 DEGREES, TCH 31. ADD NOTE: VGSI AND DESCENT ANGLES NOT COINCIDENT. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmmm. Just how accurate is this guy's DG?
Headings in one hundredths of a degree??? -- Mike Granby, PP-ASEL,IA Warrior N44578 http://www.mikeg.net/plane |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Headings in one hundredths of a degree???
What about descent angles to within one hundredths of a degree? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Esres" wrote in message ... Headings in one hundredths of a degree??? What about descent angles to within one hundredths of a degree? They are consistantly listed in approach plates to that precision. Even when they are exactly 3 degrees, the notation looks like: GS 3.00 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Greg Esres" wrote in message
... Headings in one hundredths of a degree??? What about descent angles to within one hundredths of a degree? That makes more sense. A hundredth-degree change in descent angle is (barely) perceptible on the ASI or VSI. A hundredth-degree change in heading is not perceptible on the HI or MC. --Gary |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary L. Drescher" wrote:
A hundredth-degree change in descent angle is (barely) perceptible on the ASI or VSI. I'd like to see a pilot or VSI which can notice the difference between 500 fpm and 502 fpm. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... "Gary L. Drescher" wrote: A hundredth-degree change in descent angle is (barely) perceptible on the ASI or VSI. I'd like to see a pilot or VSI which can notice the difference between 500 fpm and 502 fpm. It's not even that much. However, the charts always show the glideslope to the 100th. They never show headings to that accuracy. If he'd actually looked hard at the chart as to what they were changing, the fact that the elevation (which is depecited on the chart in the same location) also changed would have been a big clue. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roy Smith" wrote in message
... "Gary L. Drescher" wrote: A hundredth-degree change in descent angle is (barely) perceptible on the ASI or VSI. I'd like to see a pilot or VSI which can notice the difference between 500 fpm and 502 fpm. You're right, it would have been more accurate for me to say a *few* hundredths of a degree. But that still justifies more than one decimal place of precision. A few hundredths of a degree change of descent angle moves the VSI needle almost as much as a one-degree heading change moves the HI (and courses are routinely specified with single-degree precision). --Gary |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carefull of NOTAMS on NavCanada website | Ross Magnaldo | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 10th 03 11:46 PM |
ILS Notam question | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | August 22nd 03 11:53 PM |
"GPS Unreliable" NOTAM | Robert Henry | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | July 23rd 03 01:00 AM |