![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My POH says that I have 72 gals of useable fuel (Piper Turbo Arrow III).
How do I really know if it can burn all 72 gals before running out? Could it be 70? 68? Does the number change if I am climbing, descending, cruising, or in turbulence? I would imagine it would be affected by attitude. I have come to understand that the fuel flow gauge and the fuel quantity gauges are highly inaccurate. It sure would be nice to know, with pretty high confidence, at any given time, exactly how much fuel you have and how many more minutes before your airplane becomes a glider. Does someone make reliable gauges of this sort for GA aircraft? Is there a rule of thumb for conserving fuel in getting from point A to point B. I presume one uses the "Best Economy" settings at 55% power. Of course, that also slows you way down...but I am guessing that you would still be better off in terms of preserving the most fuel by the time you got to point B, right? -Sami |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote:
My POH says that I have 72 gals of useable fuel (Piper Turbo Arrow III). How do I really know if it can burn all 72 gals before running out? Could it be 70? 68? Does the number change if I am climbing, descending, cruising, or in turbulence? I would imagine it would be affected by attitude. The answer you seek is found in part 23, which has to do with certification of aircraft. Most, but not all, aircraft flying today were certified under part 23: 23.959 Unusable fuel supply. (a) The unusable fuel supply for each tank must be established as not less than that quantity at which the first evidence of malfunctioning occurs under the most adverse fuel feed condition occurring under each intended operation and flight maneuver involving that tank. Fuel system component failures need not be considered. So, yes, you can use all 72 gallons. In reality, of course, it's really 36 gallons per tank. Having one full tank doesn't mean you can run the other one below the usable level and still draw from it. Notice, however, that this is only true for "each intended operation". Some POH's contain warnings like "turning takeoffs prohibited", "avoid extended slips with fuel tank less than half full", "takeoff prohibited using a tank less than 1/4 full", etc. If your POH says things like that, then those are not "intended operations", and there's no promise that you'll still be able to draw fuel while doing those things. I have come to understand that the fuel flow gauge and the fuel quantity gauges are highly inaccurate. It sure would be nice to know, with pretty high confidence, at any given time, exactly how much fuel you have and how many more minutes before your airplane becomes a glider. Does someone make reliable gauges of this sort for GA aircraft? The best way I know is to know how much fuel you started with, know what your fuel burn is (from careful pre-flight planning, power settings, and experience), and keep track of the time with your watch. The next step up is to install one of the electronic fuel computers currently available for many GA models. These things measure fuel flow quite accurately (much more accurately than the analog gauge on your panel, which is really a fuel pressure sensor). They also typically have some convenient totalizing functions, and often interface with a GPS to tell you things like estimated fuel remaining at your destination. Is there a rule of thumb for conserving fuel in getting from point A to point B. I presume one uses the "Best Economy" settings at 55% power. Often that's the answer, but not always. Flying with a tailwind, you'll cover more ground per gallon at a lower speed. With a headwind, you'll want to fly at a higher speed. How much faster or slower? There's rules of thumb (add half the headwind, for example), but the real answer is to sit down with the performance charts for your plane and an E6B and work out some sample scenarios. Of course, one of your pre-flight planning tasks should be to look at the winds aloft and see which altitude will give you the most favorable winds. Most GA planes operate in such a narrow altitude band that it often doesn't matter too much which you pick, but you said you're flying a turbo. Your service ceiling is probably in the flight levels, so you've got a lot more possibilities than most people. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The answer you seek is found in part 23, which has to do with certification of aircraft. Most, but not all, aircraft flying today Most light aircraft are certified under Part 23. Most serious aircraft are certified under Part 25. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... The answer you seek is found in part 23, which has to do with certification of aircraft. Most, but not all, aircraft flying today Most light aircraft are certified under Part 23. Most serious aircraft are certified under Part 25. There are many more Part 23 airplanes than Part 25 airplanes, in the US. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tarver Engineering wrote: wrote in message ... The answer you seek is found in part 23, which has to do with certification of aircraft. Most, but not all, aircraft flying today Most light aircraft are certified under Part 23. Most serious aircraft are certified under Part 25. There are many more Part 23 airplanes than Part 25 airplanes, in the US. There are more Fords than BMWs, too. So what? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do I really know if it can burn all 72 gals before running out?
You might want to read this article, "Run That Fuel Tank Dry!": http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182044-1.html Barry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ...
My POH says that I have 72 gals of useable fuel (Piper Turbo Arrow III). How do I really know if it can burn all 72 gals before running out? Could it be 70? 68? Does the number change if I am climbing, descending, cruising, or in turbulence? I would imagine it would be affected by attitude. I have come to understand that the fuel flow gauge and the fuel quantity gauges are highly inaccurate. It sure would be nice to know, with pretty high confidence, at any given time, exactly how much fuel you have and how many more minutes before your airplane becomes a glider. Does someone make reliable gauges of this sort for GA aircraft? Yes. Get a fuel flow sensor (transducer). The one I have (in a Bonanza) is made by JPI and is typically accurate to less than a gallon. This provides the double benefit of being able to know just when to switch tanks in the event of a low fuel situation as well as total fuel available. Coupled to my GPS, the sensor tells me how much fuel I'll have remaining at the end of the flight. Its very accurate. Is there a rule of thumb for conserving fuel in getting from point A to point B. I presume one uses the "Best Economy" settings at 55% power. Of course, that also slows you way down...but I am guessing that you would still be better off in terms of preserving the most fuel by the time you got to point B, right? -Sami |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get a copy of John C Eckalbar's book, FLYING THE BEECH BONANZA.
All your questions will be answered and more. This and his other books are must reads for anyone flying high performance aircraft. "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: My POH says that I have 72 gals of useable fuel (Piper Turbo Arrow III). How do I really know if it can burn all 72 gals before running out? Could it be 70? 68? Does the number change if I am climbing, descending, cruising, or in turbulence? I would imagine it would be affected by attitude. I have come to understand that the fuel flow gauge and the fuel quantity gauges are highly inaccurate. It sure would be nice to know, with pretty high confidence, at any given time, exactly how much fuel you have and how many more minutes before your airplane becomes a glider. Does someone make reliable gauges of this sort for GA aircraft? Is there a rule of thumb for conserving fuel in getting from point A to point B. I presume one uses the "Best Economy" settings at 55% power. Of course, that also slows you way down...but I am guessing that you would still be better off in terms of preserving the most fuel by the time you got to point B, right? -Sami |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sami
my gauges seem pretty accurate, I also have a shadin fuel flow monitor that tells me how many hours I can fly and so on. I would recemmend anyone who does long XC's where they have to stop to refuel to get a fuel flow monitor. I fly at 65% power, thats because I dont have all the nifty toys like you have, other wise I would be flying at 75% power. The only exception is when I have a strong tail wind and a reduction in power does not really affect my ground speed. If you want to use less fuel fly higher. But my rule of thumb is not to fly more then 5 hours per leg, this is with full tanks. "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: My POH says that I have 72 gals of useable fuel (Piper Turbo Arrow III). How do I really know if it can burn all 72 gals before running out? Could it be 70? 68? Does the number change if I am climbing, descending, cruising, or in turbulence? I would imagine it would be affected by attitude. I have come to understand that the fuel flow gauge and the fuel quantity gauges are highly inaccurate. It sure would be nice to know, with pretty high confidence, at any given time, exactly how much fuel you have and how many more minutes before your airplane becomes a glider. Does someone make reliable gauges of this sort for GA aircraft? Is there a rule of thumb for conserving fuel in getting from point A to point B. I presume one uses the "Best Economy" settings at 55% power. Of course, that also slows you way down...but I am guessing that you would still be better off in terms of preserving the most fuel by the time you got to point B, right? -Sami |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" wrote in message ... I fly at 65% power, thats because I dont have all the nifty toys like you have, other wise I would be flying at 75% power. The only exception is when I have a strong tail wind and a reduction in power does not really affect my ground speed. If you want to use less fuel fly higher. But my rule of thumb is not to fly more then 5 hours per leg, this is with full tanks. Not without a wooden leg, either. You young whippersnappers might do that, but I'd think us older guys would have to be winched out of the cockpit after five hours. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |
Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 02:57 AM |
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump | Greg Reid | Home Built | 15 | October 7th 03 07:09 PM |
Fuel pressure Problems | smf | Home Built | 3 | September 7th 03 08:25 PM |