![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been doing most of my GPS flying with a CNX-80, which doesn't seem
to suffer from loss of RAIM. Last night I was flying with a GX-60, and got a RAIM warning when commencing an approach. The GX-60 manual isn't real illuminating on what you're supposed to do at this point. Presumably, "continue the approach as if nothing happened" would not be smart (although, being VFR, that's exactly what we did last night). So, what do you do? Ask ATC to hold someplace in the hopes the RAIM warning goes away as the satellites shuffle around? If so, how long would you expect this would take? Does the controller know enough about GPS to understand what I mean if I tell him "I've got a RAIM alert"? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Last night I was flying with a GX-60, and got a RAIM warning when commencing an approach. The GX-60 manual isn't real illuminating on what you're supposed to do at this point. Switch to your backup navigation system, which you've been using all along. This is one of the reasons why GPS is not authorized as a sole navigation means (you need to have a backup) Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have no in-panel backup for a GPS approach not based on a VOR or some
other navaid. And that's authorized. If the RAIM warning persists you'd have to treat it as navigation-equipment failure and discontinue the approach and of course tell ATC. If the missed approach fix is also a GPS-only waypoint, you'll need vectors to it. If you're not in radar coverage you've got another problem; you have to know what a safe course of action is considering the terrain. "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... Last night I was flying with a GX-60, and got a RAIM warning when commencing an approach. The GX-60 manual isn't real illuminating on what you're supposed to do at this point. Switch to your backup navigation system, which you've been using all along. This is one of the reasons why GPS is not authorized as a sole navigation means (you need to have a backup) Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... Last night I was flying with a GX-60, and got a RAIM warning when commencing an approach. The GX-60 manual isn't real illuminating on what you're supposed to do at this point. Switch to your backup navigation system, which you've been using all along. This is one of the reasons why GPS is not authorized as a sole navigation means (you need to have a backup) All of this is wrong. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() C J Campbell wrote: "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... Last night I was flying with a GX-60, and got a RAIM warning when commencing an approach. The GX-60 manual isn't real illuminating on what you're supposed to do at this point. Switch to your backup navigation system, which you've been using all along. This is one of the reasons why GPS is not authorized as a sole navigation means (you need to have a backup) All of this is wrong. All of what is wrong? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
I've been doing most of my GPS flying with a CNX-80, which doesn't seem to suffer from loss of RAIM. Last night I was flying with a GX-60, and got a RAIM warning when commencing an approach. The GX-60 manual isn't real illuminating on what you're supposed to do at this point. Presumably, "continue the approach as if nothing happened" would not be smart (although, being VFR, that's exactly what we did last night). So, what do you do? Ask ATC to hold someplace in the hopes the RAIM warning goes away as the satellites shuffle around? If so, how long would you expect this would take? Does the controller know enough about GPS to understand what I mean if I tell him "I've got a RAIM alert"? He's probably ask you why you were worried that it was raining? :-) Seriously, good question, and I haven't seen this addressed yet in anything I've read. Must be in the fine print somewhere though. Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look to the AIM, not the manual. 1-1-20(j)(3) makes it clear.
Bob Gardner "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Roy Smith wrote: I've been doing most of my GPS flying with a CNX-80, which doesn't seem to suffer from loss of RAIM. Last night I was flying with a GX-60, and got a RAIM warning when commencing an approach. The GX-60 manual isn't real illuminating on what you're supposed to do at this point. Presumably, "continue the approach as if nothing happened" would not be smart (although, being VFR, that's exactly what we did last night). So, what do you do? Ask ATC to hold someplace in the hopes the RAIM warning goes away as the satellites shuffle around? If so, how long would you expect this would take? Does the controller know enough about GPS to understand what I mean if I tell him "I've got a RAIM alert"? He's probably ask you why you were worried that it was raining? :-) Seriously, good question, and I haven't seen this addressed yet in anything I've read. Must be in the fine print somewhere though. Matt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Bob Gardner" wrote: Look to the AIM, not the manual. 1-1-20(j)(3) makes it clear. Thanks for the reference (although, it looks like it's really 1-1-19, not 1-1-20, at least in the version I've got). While that does clear things up a bit, it still leaves one with a bit of head-scratching to do. The immediate action is clear; continue to fly the approach track, but do not descend to the MDA, and execute the missed when you reach the MAWP. But what then? It says I should contact ATC as soon as practical, but what do I tell them? Presumably, I start with the obvious, "New York, 3875T, missed approach", but what do I want to do after that? If I just get vectors back for another shot, is it likely that the condition which caused the RAIM alert will have resolved itself by then? Is there a standard phrasology for telling the controller you had a RAIM alert? It seems like there should be some compact way to say, "I had a problem with my GPS equipment, but don't worry, it'll fix itself in a little while". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tracking those section and subsections makes my head ache, but 1-1-19 is
clearly labeled "Doppler Radar" in my 2004 FAR/AIM. In any event, a section titled "Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring," in subsection (3), tells the reader that if a RAIM/status annunciation occurs prior to the final approach waypoint, the approach should not be completed since GPS may no longer provide the required accuracy." Subsection (4) says: "If the receiver does not sequence into the approach mode or a RAIM failure/status annunciation occurs prior to the FAWP the pilot should not descend to MDA but should proceed to the missed approach waypoint (MAWP) via the FAWP, perform a missed approach, and contact ATC as soon as practicable." With the exception of telling us how to pronounce fiver and niner and how to report altitudes, the AIM is not big on pilot phraseology, as you know. ATCH tells controllers exactly what to say, with little wiggle room, but pilots have no similar publication to refer to...and I suspect that that situation will not change. Bob Gardner "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... In article , "Bob Gardner" wrote: Look to the AIM, not the manual. 1-1-20(j)(3) makes it clear. Thanks for the reference (although, it looks like it's really 1-1-19, not 1-1-20, at least in the version I've got). While that does clear things up a bit, it still leaves one with a bit of head-scratching to do. The immediate action is clear; continue to fly the approach track, but do not descend to the MDA, and execute the missed when you reach the MAWP. But what then? It says I should contact ATC as soon as practical, but what do I tell them? Presumably, I start with the obvious, "New York, 3875T, missed approach", but what do I want to do after that? If I just get vectors back for another shot, is it likely that the condition which caused the RAIM alert will have resolved itself by then? Is there a standard phrasology for telling the controller you had a RAIM alert? It seems like there should be some compact way to say, "I had a problem with my GPS equipment, but don't worry, it'll fix itself in a little while". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tracking those section and subsections makes my head ache, but 1-1-19 is
clearly labeled "Doppler Radar" in my 2004 FAR/AIM. Bob, The latest AIM is available online at http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/. John Bell |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAIM Prediction | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | October 4th 03 03:39 AM |
Big News -- WAAS GPS is Operational for IFR | Lockheed employee | Instrument Flight Rules | 87 | July 30th 03 02:08 AM |