![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you ever heard of, or have any experience with a thing called the
"Transponder Landing System", a form of IFR approach using a transponder? What is it, how does it work, does it work, do you have to have a special "endorsement" to fly it, etc? TDS N2997Y |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AIM 1-1-23. Special training is required.
Bob Gardner "Trent D. Sanders" wrote in message om... Have you ever heard of, or have any experience with a thing called the "Transponder Landing System", a form of IFR approach using a transponder? What is it, how does it work, does it work, do you have to have a special "endorsement" to fly it, etc? TDS N2997Y |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have flown the demonstrator that was set up at Madras. A couple of
corporate operators were going to get together and buy one for Sun Valley. I don't think that ever happened. It takes a controller on the ground with the equipment and you get a special squawk and just fly it like any other ILS. Curved approaches are possible. There was military application as well. The unit could be parachuted out and set up in 30 minutes to a remote location. Karl "Trent D. Sanders" wrote in message om... Have you ever heard of, or have any experience with a thing called the "Transponder Landing System", a form of IFR approach using a transponder? What is it, how does it work, does it work, do you have to have a special "endorsement" to fly it, etc? TDS N2997Y |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kage wrote:
I have flown the demonstrator that was set up at Madras. A couple of corporate operators were going to get together and buy one for Sun Valley. There was also a demonstrator set up at The Dalles airport (DLS) for a while. The company working on this is Advanced Navigation Positioning Systems (www.anpc.com) of Hood River, OR. According to their web site, they have 4 sites where it is installed and a dozen or so planned. I'm not sure what installed means as the DLS one is considered "installed", but it certainly not an approved approach. Ditto for Pullman, WA. I flew the approach DLS approach under VFR. Seemed to work ok. I'm not sure what special training would be required. You have to talk to a controller on the ground and get a transponder code. After that, tune your radio to the right frequency and follow the needles. The Dalles approach was an normal dme arc that put you onto the TLS straight-in approach course. A curving TLS approach could be interesting. -- Frank Stutzman Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl" Hood River, OR |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TLS is a substitute for an ILS where an ILS can't be installed due to
terrain or other factors. It's also a whole lot cheaper than an ILS so it's useful for smaller airports. That's good, because it's capacity limited (more later) so it's not a good solution for busy airports. It works by using a Mode A interrogator and multiple receivers around the periphery of the airport. By measuring the time difference of arrival (TDOA) of your transponder replies, it calculates your position relative to the airport and the approach path. It then broadcasts thru an omni antenna an "ILS" signal modulating the 90 and 150 Hz tones to drive your CDI to indicate the proper guidance to the approach path. To fly it, you have to set your transponder to the squawk code on the approach plate (so it knows who is flying the approach) and tune your ILS receiver to the "ILS" freq. The you fly it just like an ILS approach. No special endorsements or training. The capacity limitation I mentioned above comes about because only one a/c can have the approach squawk code set at any one time or the system will get confused and flag. I haven't flown one. Most are in the pacific northwest at small airports in the mountains. Try the following link: http://anpc.com/ Gerry "Trent D. Sanders" wrote in message om... Have you ever heard of, or have any experience with a thing called the "Transponder Landing System", a form of IFR approach using a transponder? What is it, how does it work, does it work, do you have to have a special "endorsement" to fly it, etc? TDS N2997Y |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lousy website!
You have to use MSIE to access it! Gerry Caron wrote: Try the following link: http://anpc.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It isn't cheaper when you consider that it requires an operator.
Mike MU-2 "Gerry Caron" wrote in message . .. TLS is a substitute for an ILS where an ILS can't be installed due to terrain or other factors. It's also a whole lot cheaper than an ILS so it's useful for smaller airports. That's good, because it's capacity limited (more later) so it's not a good solution for busy airports. It works by using a Mode A interrogator and multiple receivers around the periphery of the airport. By measuring the time difference of arrival (TDOA) of your transponder replies, it calculates your position relative to the airport and the approach path. It then broadcasts thru an omni antenna an "ILS" signal modulating the 90 and 150 Hz tones to drive your CDI to indicate the proper guidance to the approach path. To fly it, you have to set your transponder to the squawk code on the approach plate (so it knows who is flying the approach) and tune your ILS receiver to the "ILS" freq. The you fly it just like an ILS approach. No special endorsements or training. The capacity limitation I mentioned above comes about because only one a/c can have the approach squawk code set at any one time or the system will get confused and flag. I haven't flown one. Most are in the pacific northwest at small airports in the mountains. Try the following link: http://anpc.com/ Gerry "Trent D. Sanders" wrote in message om... Have you ever heard of, or have any experience with a thing called the "Transponder Landing System", a form of IFR approach using a transponder? What is it, how does it work, does it work, do you have to have a special "endorsement" to fly it, etc? TDS N2997Y |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" writes:
"Gerry Caron" wrote "Trent D. Sanders" wrote Have you ever heard of, or have any experience with a thing called the "Transponder Landing System", a form of IFR approach using a transponder? What is it, how does it work, does it work, do you have to have a special "endorsement" to fly it, etc? TLS is a substitute for an ILS where an ILS can't be installed due to terrain or other factors. It's also a whole lot cheaper than an ILS so it's useful for smaller airports. That's good, because it's capacity limited (more later) so it's not a good solution for busy airports. It works by using a Mode A interrogator and multiple receivers around the periphery of the airport. By measuring the time difference of arrival (TDOA) of your transponder replies, it calculates your position relative to the airport and the approach path. It then broadcasts thru an omni antenna an "ILS" signal modulating the 90 and 150 Hz tones to drive your CDI to indicate the proper guidance to the approach path. To fly it, you have to set your transponder to the squawk code on the approach plate (so it knows who is flying the approach) and tune your ILS receiver to the "ILS" freq. The you fly it just like an ILS approach. No special endorsements or training. The capacity limitation I mentioned above comes about because only one a/c can have the approach squawk code set at any one time or the system will get confused and flag. I haven't flown one. Most are in the pacific northwest at small airports in the mountains. Try the following link: http://anpc.com/ It isn't cheaper when you consider that it requires an operator. The descriptions given above and other followups don't make it clear: What's the function of the operator? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need an operator to asign codes to inbound aircraft (ATC was not going
to do this). Presumably the machine also need to get the code input. There was talk about putting one in here at SZT but the operator issue killed it along with comments by the FAA that the localizer would have to be removed. The TLS was also only going to be approved for a limited number of users (certainly not part 91 piston airplanes, after all they only comprise 90% of the airplanes using the airport). It was also only going to be in use for a limited number of hours per day (when the operator was present) I think that the solution is precision GPS approaches. Mike MU-2 "Everett M. Greene" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: "Gerry Caron" wrote "Trent D. Sanders" wrote Have you ever heard of, or have any experience with a thing called the "Transponder Landing System", a form of IFR approach using a transponder? What is it, how does it work, does it work, do you have to have a special "endorsement" to fly it, etc? TLS is a substitute for an ILS where an ILS can't be installed due to terrain or other factors. It's also a whole lot cheaper than an ILS so it's useful for smaller airports. That's good, because it's capacity limited (more later) so it's not a good solution for busy airports. It works by using a Mode A interrogator and multiple receivers around the periphery of the airport. By measuring the time difference of arrival (TDOA) of your transponder replies, it calculates your position relative to the airport and the approach path. It then broadcasts thru an omni antenna an "ILS" signal modulating the 90 and 150 Hz tones to drive your CDI to indicate the proper guidance to the approach path. To fly it, you have to set your transponder to the squawk code on the approach plate (so it knows who is flying the approach) and tune your ILS receiver to the "ILS" freq. The you fly it just like an ILS approach. No special endorsements or training. The capacity limitation I mentioned above comes about because only one a/c can have the approach squawk code set at any one time or the system will get confused and flag. I haven't flown one. Most are in the pacific northwest at small airports in the mountains. Try the following link: http://anpc.com/ It isn't cheaper when you consider that it requires an operator. The descriptions given above and other followups don't make it clear: What's the function of the operator? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message thlink.net...
It isn't cheaper when you consider that it requires an operator. Mike MU-2 Does it require a dedicated operator, or can any old controller hanging out in the tower run it? Out East I can't think of any Class D fields that don't have at least 1 ILS, but perhaps in other regions that's sometimes the case? -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"bush flying" in the suburbs? | [email protected] | Home Built | 85 | December 28th 04 11:04 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Fixing the Transponder with Duct Tape and Aluminum Foil | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 45 | March 14th 04 12:18 AM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |
2nd update on Review of Plasma II Ignition System | MikeremlaP | Home Built | 8 | July 22nd 03 01:37 AM |