A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flight Review in a turbo twin



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th 07, 02:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Chad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin

I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners
do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine
work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered
that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines,
specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single
engine for the review?

  #2  
Old February 16th 07, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin

chad wrote:
I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners
do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine
work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered
that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines,
specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single
engine for the review?


How do you figure flying for an hour will be hard on the engines?

A flight review is not the same as the practical test.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #3  
Old February 16th 07, 02:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Kyle Boatright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin


"chad" wrote in message
ups.com...
I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners
do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine
work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered
that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines,
specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single
engine for the review?


Explain your concern to the instructor before the flight and make sure he
understands what things you *don't* want done with your engines. Then ask
ask if s/he can give you a flight review without doing any of the things you
consider problematic.

And remember, you are PIC, so you can say "No, I don't want to do that out
of concern for $50,000 of engines.."

If you can't find an instructor who is comfortable with your rules, go ahead
and rent a C-152 or whatever. It'll probably be cheaper than whatever it
really costs you to run that 310 for an hour.

KB


  #4  
Old February 16th 07, 01:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin

Take your review by getting signed off in a tail dragger... You will
learn more about airplane handling than a hundred hours of pointing
your twin towards the horizon...

denny

  #5  
Old February 16th 07, 02:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin

On 15 Feb 2007 18:00:06 -0800, "chad" wrote:

I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners
do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine
work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered
that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines,
specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single
engine for the review?


The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls,
slow flight, steep turns, and landings.

These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many
high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine.

If I was you, I would rent a single for the day.

-Nathan

  #6  
Old February 16th 07, 03:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin

Nathan Young wrote:
On 15 Feb 2007 18:00:06 -0800, "chad" wrote:


I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners
do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine
work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered
that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines,
specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single
engine for the review?


The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls,
slow flight, steep turns, and landings.


These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many
high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine.


If I was you, I would rent a single for the day.


-Nathan


My last review focused on communications (center, tower, ground),
airport area procedures, efficient use of the radios, using proper
phraseology, etc.

All the CFI's I know will pretty much do whatever you suggest you
feel you could use some brush up on. There is no requirement to do
basic maneuvers.

If you are instrument rated, is there some procedure you are less than
100% at?

If you are not instrument rated, when was the last time you did some
hood time?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #7  
Old February 16th 07, 04:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin

On Feb 16, 6:35 am, Nathan Young wrote:

The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls,
slow flight, steep turns, and landings.

These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many
high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine.

If I was you, I would rent a single for the day.


As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know
his daily flying is a turbo twin. However, we could probably do the
flight review in the twin without putting too much stress on his
engines. Or, he could rent a twin.

-Robert, CFII


  #8  
Old February 16th 07, 11:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Kyle Boatright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Feb 16, 6:35 am, Nathan Young wrote:

The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls,
slow flight, steep turns, and landings.

These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many
high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine.

If I was you, I would rent a single for the day.


As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know
his daily flying is a turbo twin. However, we could probably do the
flight review in the twin without putting too much stress on his
engines. Or, he could rent a twin.

-Robert, CFII


You're the CFI, so you can sign off whatever you want, but that doesn't make
sense to me. If a guy who flies B-747's for a living can get his tailwheel
endorsement and have that count as a BFR, I don't see why anyone would draw
a line in the sand as you describe... I don't think that is what the FAA
intended when they created the BFR...

KB


  #9  
Old February 17th 07, 12:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin



Kyle Boatright wrote:

As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know
his daily flying is a turbo twin.




I have a friend with four super cubs, one on amphibs. A 182 with a
canard on the nose, 310 hp and 26 bush wheels all around.
A Spartan Executive. A Caravan and a 210 with a turbine in it. What
should he do his BFR with?
  #10  
Old February 17th 07, 01:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Kyle Boatright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Flight Review in a turbo twin

I know you didn't intentionally mis-attribute that, but....

KB


"Newps" wrote in message
. ..


Kyle Boatright wrote:

As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know
his daily flying is a turbo twin.




I have a friend with four super cubs, one on amphibs. A 182 with a canard
on the nose, 310 hp and 26 bush wheels all around.
A Spartan Executive. A Caravan and a 210 with a turbine in it. What
should he do his BFR with?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Online Flight Review Course john smith Piloting 1 May 29th 06 02:02 AM
Electronic review of flight? Al Instrument Flight Rules 19 December 30th 05 09:51 PM
Turbo performance vs non-turbo John Doe Owning 22 October 8th 05 02:34 AM
Non-TW CFI cannot give Flight Review in TW Hilton Piloting 12 January 19th 04 10:31 PM
Converting engine from Turbo to non-Turbo Dick Kurtz Home Built 7 October 31st 03 04:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.