![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners
do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines, specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single engine for the review? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
chad wrote:
I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines, specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single engine for the review? How do you figure flying for an hour will be hard on the engines? A flight review is not the same as the practical test. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "chad" wrote in message ups.com... I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines, specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single engine for the review? Explain your concern to the instructor before the flight and make sure he understands what things you *don't* want done with your engines. Then ask ask if s/he can give you a flight review without doing any of the things you consider problematic. And remember, you are PIC, so you can say "No, I don't want to do that out of concern for $50,000 of engines.." If you can't find an instructor who is comfortable with your rules, go ahead and rent a C-152 or whatever. It'll probably be cheaper than whatever it really costs you to run that 310 for an hour. KB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take your review by getting signed off in a tail dragger... You will
learn more about airplane handling than a hundred hours of pointing your twin towards the horizon... denny |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Feb 2007 18:00:06 -0800, "chad" wrote:
I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines, specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single engine for the review? The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls, slow flight, steep turns, and landings. These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine. If I was you, I would rent a single for the day. -Nathan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan Young wrote:
On 15 Feb 2007 18:00:06 -0800, "chad" wrote: I own a turbo Cessna 310 and I'm wondering if other turbo twin owners do their biennial flight review in their aircraft. Is single engine work required for a flight review if done in a twin? I'm concered that doing the review in my aircraft may be hard on the engines, specifically the turbos. Would I be better off to just rent a single engine for the review? The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls, slow flight, steep turns, and landings. These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine. If I was you, I would rent a single for the day. -Nathan My last review focused on communications (center, tower, ground), airport area procedures, efficient use of the radios, using proper phraseology, etc. All the CFI's I know will pretty much do whatever you suggest you feel you could use some brush up on. There is no requirement to do basic maneuvers. If you are instrument rated, is there some procedure you are less than 100% at? If you are not instrument rated, when was the last time you did some hood time? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 6:35 am, Nathan Young wrote:
The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls, slow flight, steep turns, and landings. These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine. If I was you, I would rent a single for the day. As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know his daily flying is a turbo twin. However, we could probably do the flight review in the twin without putting too much stress on his engines. Or, he could rent a twin. -Robert, CFII |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 16, 6:35 am, Nathan Young wrote: The flight portion of my BFRs have focused on basic maneuvers, stalls, slow flight, steep turns, and landings. These procedures pretty much dictate the engines will go through many high/low power cycles... Not the best for a turbo'd engine. If I was you, I would rent a single for the day. As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know his daily flying is a turbo twin. However, we could probably do the flight review in the twin without putting too much stress on his engines. Or, he could rent a twin. -Robert, CFII You're the CFI, so you can sign off whatever you want, but that doesn't make sense to me. If a guy who flies B-747's for a living can get his tailwheel endorsement and have that count as a BFR, I don't see why anyone would draw a line in the sand as you describe... I don't think that is what the FAA intended when they created the BFR... KB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Kyle Boatright wrote: As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know his daily flying is a turbo twin. I have a friend with four super cubs, one on amphibs. A 182 with a canard on the nose, 310 hp and 26 bush wheels all around. A Spartan Executive. A Caravan and a 210 with a turbine in it. What should he do his BFR with? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know you didn't intentionally mis-attribute that, but....
KB "Newps" wrote in message . .. Kyle Boatright wrote: As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know his daily flying is a turbo twin. I have a friend with four super cubs, one on amphibs. A 182 with a canard on the nose, 310 hp and 26 bush wheels all around. A Spartan Executive. A Caravan and a 210 with a turbine in it. What should he do his BFR with? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Online Flight Review Course | john smith | Piloting | 1 | May 29th 06 02:02 AM |
Electronic review of flight? | Al | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | December 30th 05 09:51 PM |
Turbo performance vs non-turbo | John Doe | Owning | 22 | October 8th 05 02:34 AM |
Non-TW CFI cannot give Flight Review in TW | Hilton | Piloting | 12 | January 19th 04 10:31 PM |
Converting engine from Turbo to non-Turbo | Dick Kurtz | Home Built | 7 | October 31st 03 04:48 PM |