![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Monkeying around with my new camera today as well as warming up the
engine for an oil change that was due. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki79yX4bhJ4 This video that shows my startup, runup and shutdown procedures. Entire video is on the ground. Text overlay's explain "why I did do what I do" Any comments to improving what I do always most appreciated. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqOaE8uG1Eg This video is my takeoff, contact with KJAN approach, various types of turns and three landings. The last landing in this video is my best I have captured on video to date. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 25, 4:15*am, " wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqOaE8uG1Eg This video is my takeoff, contact with KJAN approach, various types of turns and three landings. *The last landing in this video is my best I have captured on video to date. Nice videos, as usual. Just one little question. ISTR that there's a FAA reg which states that Vref needs to be 30% above Vso on the threshold. Since the stall warning came on just ere each of three landings, were you closer to Vso than 30%? Or am I missing something? Thanks in advance, Ramapriya |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 25, 4:16*am, Clark wrote:
D Ramapriya wrote in news:0ae3a0aa-b600-4f76-8187- : On Jul 25, 4:15*am, " wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqOaE8uG1Eg This video is my takeoff, contact with KJAN approach, various types of turns and three landings. *The last landing in this video is my best I have captured on video to date. Nice videos, as usual. Just one little question. ISTR that there's a FAA reg which states that Vref needs to be 30% above Vso on the threshold. Since the stall warning came on just ere each of three landings, were you closer to Vso than 30%? Or am I missing something? I'm sure Alan can/will respond but I'll throw in my 0.02 anyway. :-) 1.3Vso is recommended for approach. It isn't a FAR reg as far as I know. That said, it is standard procedure to land a single engine aircraft at/about Vso. Landing is simply rounding out the descent and then holding the aircraft off the ground +/- 1 foot until it quits flying. It is much easier to type the description than to execute it. Anyway, the stall warning should be on when the wheels touch. In my aircraft, the stall warning activates about 10 kts above stall so it is frequently on in the round out. Look at it from the other side. If the aircraft is above Vso at touch down then the aircraft is much more likely to bounce. Bounces are very bad since they tend to lead to a nose low attitude and damage to the aircraft. If you always touchdown at or slightly below Vso then you won't bounce. Perhaps the part that bothers you is the approach is flown at 1.3Vso and the landing is at Vso. For a pilot, that is no big deal. Just pull the throttle back at the appropriate time and fly the roundout. The airspeed takes care of itself. For a new to you aircraft, a few practice landings is all it takes to get the timing right. If a pilot wants to cheat a bit then they leave a little power in to help break the descent and cushion the landing. Anyway, Alan did good. Sure he got slow on the second approach. No big deal, it happens to all of us. Push the nose down and give it a little more power then kick ourself in the butt and remember pitch for airspeed, power for glideslope, trim is your friend. That last landing looked like a work of art, the camera didn't even jiggle. --- there should be a "sig" here I would have to agree with Clark, I hear of the 1.3 Vso number which definitely wouldn't be "30 percent" (more like 13 percent if I have my math correct?). One thing to note is the outer scale of my ASI is in MPH and inner scale is knots. I read off knots in my airspeed readbacks. Could that be causing confusion for Ramapriya??? Clark, I normally do 78 knot finals and another person was busting my chops so I figured to do the book value which almost bit me on that second approach. Probably a rare video to see that show how to correct the slow airspeed problem in the "real world" as you can see the cowling lowered and stall horn a split second later stop sounding. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 25, 12:16*pm, Clark wrote:
1.3Vso is recommended for approach. It isn't a FAR reg as far as I know. That said, it is standard procedure to land a single engine aircraft at/about Vso. Landing is simply rounding out the descent and then holding the aircraft off the ground +/- 1 foot until it quits flying. It is much easier to type the description than to execute it. Anyway, the stall warning should be on when the wheels touch. In my aircraft, the stall warning activates about 10 kts above stall so it is frequently on in the round out. Look at it from the other side. If the aircraft is above Vso at touch down then the aircraft is much more likely to bounce. Bounces are very bad since they tend to lead to a nose low attitude and damage to the aircraft. If you always touchdown at or slightly below Vso then you won't bounce. Perhaps the part that bothers you is the approach is flown at 1.3Vso and the landing is at Vso. My bad actually - I mistook the approach speed for touchdown speed! I'm not a pilot and it shows ![]() Thanks a lot, Ramapriya |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:55:46 -0700 (PDT), D Ramapriya wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:16*pm, Clark wrote: 1.3Vso is recommended for approach. It isn't a FAR reg as far as I know. That said, it is standard procedure to land a single engine aircraft at/about Vso. Landing is simply rounding out the descent and then holding the aircraft off the ground +/- 1 foot until it quits flying. It is much easier to type the description than to execute it. Anyway, the stall warning should be on when the wheels touch. In my aircraft, the stall warning activates about 10 kts above stall so it is frequently on in the round out. Look at it from the other side. If the aircraft is above Vso at touch down then the aircraft is much more likely to bounce. Bounces are very bad since they tend to lead to a nose low attitude and damage to the aircraft. If you always touchdown at or slightly below Vso then you won't bounce. Perhaps the part that bothers you is the approach is flown at 1.3Vso and the landing is at Vso. My bad actually - I mistook the approach speed for touchdown speed! I'm not a pilot and it shows ![]() Thanks a lot, Ramapriya You ask good questions though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 25, 10:25*am, Gezellig wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:55:46 -0700 (PDT), D Ramapriya wrote: On Jul 25, 12:16*pm, Clark wrote: 1.3Vso is recommended for approach. It isn't a FAR reg as far as I know. That said, it is standard procedure to land a single engine aircraft at/about Vso. Landing is simply rounding out the descent and then holding the aircraft off the ground +/- 1 foot until it quits flying. It is much easier to type the description than to execute it. Anyway, the stall warning should be on when the wheels touch. In my aircraft, the stall warning activates about 10 kts above stall so it is frequently on in the round out. Look at it from the other side. If the aircraft is above Vso at touch down then the aircraft is much more likely to bounce. Bounces are very bad since they tend to lead to a nose low attitude and damage to the aircraft. If you always touchdown at or slightly below Vso then you won't bounce. Perhaps the part that bothers you is the approach is flown at 1.3Vso and the landing is at Vso. My bad actually - I mistook the approach speed for touchdown speed! I'm not a pilot and it shows ![]() Thanks a lot, Ramapriya You ask good questions though. Agree! Especially when it makes me think "back to basics" and keeps me from taking things for granted. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:45:05 -0700 (PDT), BeechSundowner wrote:
On Jul 25, 10:25*am, Gezellig wrote: On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:55:46 -0700 (PDT), D Ramapriya wrote: On Jul 25, 12:16*pm, Clark wrote: 1.3Vso is recommended for approach. It isn't a FAR reg as far as I know. That said, it is standard procedure to land a single engine aircraft at/about Vso. Landing is simply rounding out the descent and then holding the aircraft off the ground +/- 1 foot until it quits flying. It is much easier to type the description than to execute it. Anyway, the stall warning should be on when the wheels touch. In my aircraft, the stall warning activates about 10 kts above stall so it is frequently on in the round out. Look at it from the other side. If the aircraft is above Vso at touch down then the aircraft is much more likely to bounce. Bounces are very bad since they tend to lead to a nose low attitude and damage to the aircraft. If you always touchdown at or slightly below Vso then you won't bounce. Perhaps the part that bothers you is the approach is flown at 1.3Vso and the landing is at Vso. My bad actually - I mistook the approach speed for touchdown speed! I'm not a pilot and it shows ![]() Thanks a lot, Ramapriya You ask good questions though. Agree! Especially when it makes me think "back to basics" and keeps me from taking things for granted. Which you demonstrated by performing your checklists by the book. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question: Standard rate turns, constant rate turns, and airspeed | Robert Barker | Piloting | 5 | April 15th 07 04:47 PM |
FSX startup bug | Charles O'Flynn | Simulators | 1 | January 6th 07 06:48 PM |
Oil smoke on startup | Gyroplanes | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 10th 04 04:26 PM |
Don't skip that runup! | Roger Long | Piloting | 8 | July 8th 04 07:04 PM |
Running runup? | G. Burkhart | Piloting | 39 | July 7th 04 11:25 AM |