![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, on some products. If the epoch is wrong, replacing or recharging
the battery doesn't fix the problem. I've got an ancient Garmin GPS 12 still with the correct date. If the battery went bad, maybe the case could be popped open, but it wouldn't be worth messing with. Of course if you open up a secure logger, you break the electronic seal and there goes your valid traces. The old GPS-NAV let you easily replace the electronic seal battery, but only if you knew to provide external power as you were doing that. Replacing the GPS battery would be not feasible for the user. Still a lot of CAI 302 loggers in use, they ought to be charged a couple times in the off season. Dave On 3/3/21 3:29 PM, Dan Marotta wrote: "Not user replaceable" means there's not a little door on the unit which you can open, remove, and replace the battery.Â* If you're handy or adventurous, pop that sucker open, find the battery, and replace it. You may need to do a little soldering... Dan 5J On 3/3/21 9:45 AM, Moshe Braner wrote: On 3/3/2021 10:49 AM, Mike Carris wrote: On Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 8:36:11 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote: Yeah, and all those 40 year old gliders got badges and records without any of that fancy stuff. And who doesn't miss the fun of turn point photos taken out of the sector, or film disallowed because the processor cut it, balky barographs, etc.? It took more flights but it was more fun, I think, the diamonds still sparkle! Dan 5J On 3/2/21 5:54 PM, Moshe Braner wrote: On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 6:26:48 PM UTC-5, nickkennedy wrote: Len I had a Colibri 2 I really disliked that thing, very difficult to use unless you have programmer level skills I found out. Ancient technology. LXNAV has 3 IGC flight recorders from $480 ,$610 ,$810 The $$610 and 810 have map screens and alot of features along with a logger. Easy to use and will last forever. CRAGGYAERO.COM has them at a good price point. Call Richard, he'll fix you right up. Nick T Alas nothing lasts "forever". Funny when people put such faith into the current models, but when I ask why I can't get factory support for a 15-year-old model I'm told "what do you expect?" Old mechanical instruments of good quality did last a long time - e.g., Sage varios. The Scheumann box in my (originally Kai Gertsen's) HP14 was still soldiering on after 40 years. Electronics: not so much. Computerized electronics: designed obsolescence. A Nano works great and is simple and relatively inexpensive. Connected to a XCSoar smart phone via BT, gives you everything you need for XC on any level. Right, a usable and relatively inexpensive setup.Â* I similarly use FLARM + Tophat. But, after a decade or so the battery keeping the IGC security data inside the Nano (or FLARM or whatever) will die, and you'll need to have it officially re-blessed.Â* And even if you don't care about official badges and records, the loss of settings may force you to replace the battery - if it's replaceable.Â* And the tiny battery in the GPS module will eventually die, making it slow in re-gaining a fix, and may lose necessary settings.Â* And that battery may not be replaceable.Â* And the main power battery inside the Nano (or any other unit) will die, and may or may not be user-replaceable.Â* And there may or may not be factory support. Batteries, can't live with them, can't live without them. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 15:36:46 -0500, Moshe Braner wrote:
Alas some of them use non-rechargeable coin cells, that you cannot keep alive by maintaining the main power. I thought I'd said that already, but what I should have emphasized more clearly is that as long as the main rechargeable batteries have enough charge in them to maintain a usable voltage *no current is being drawn from the coin cell* so it degrades only very slowly. There *may* be a diode to prevent flow into the coin cell while the main batteries are good, but I bet a lot of electronics maker leave that out. The proof of this is that the original coin cell in my first GPS II+ had dropped far enough in two years to be flashing up #battery low' warnings and this is what prompted to get it repaired. At that stage I was running the alkalines flat and only replacing them before the next time I used the GPS. Now, almost 25 years later, both GPS II+ units are still going strong and not warning about the coin cell getting depleted. It can be safely said that this is due to the alkilines always being replaced when the battery state indicator falls to 25% and never taking more than 30 seconds to swap old batteries for new ones. If this will work for Garmin GPS II+, then its extremely likely that that it will work well in almost any other device that relies on coin cellds to preserve memory while the main batteries are being swapped. If it uses rechargeables, thin plugging in the charger should have the exact same effect. In particular, devices that are (also) IGC-approved loggers (whether standalone loggers, varios, computers or FLARM) seem to be REQUIRED (by IGC) to have a battery inside the sealed unit - for the purpose of detecting any attempt to tamper with the innards. Sure, but that isn't problem provided you do as I do and never leave the logger or whatever with its main batteries connected and containing enough charge to hold their output voltage higher than the coin cell's output voltage. In this condition current cannot flow out of the coin cell. They are built so that if/when you open the case, the battery is disconnected and the IGC security memory is lost. Quite, but not relevant. I'd be surprised if my logger (an EW Microrecorder) doesn't have a coin cell in its sealed area. However, it also has an accessible section where its set of NiMH main batteries live. These can be replaced without damaging any seals - and will need to be replaced if mistreated. Ror 'mistreated' read 'let them sit all winter and only recharge before the first flight next year'. I know a pilot who also has an EW Microrecorder and did that. They ended up replacing the NiMH batteries every couple of years. OTOH I've had my Microrecorder since 2012 and its still using the original set of NiMH main batteries. The only disadvantage of NiMH is that they have a high self-discharge rate and so I need to recharge them every 4-5 weeks during the winter (and the COVID Winter too). Those batteries end up dead after a decade or so, and then you have to have a factory rep re-seal them, meaning replace the battery and do something or another to make the unit consider itself secure again. Well, the coin cells in the Garmin GPSes have done 25 years so far and the one in the Microrecorder is going fine after 9 years. (The sealing sticker itself is just a warning not to open it.) Thus these devices are ticking time bombs that, without factory-rep support, will self-brick. Nothing lasts "forever"! Sure, but the difference in lifetimes between something which is bunged in the cupboard and neglected between flying seasons and a device whose kept charged is quite dramatic. And the inability of long-stored GPS units to figure out which "epoch" they really are in is another form of planned obsolescence. I think its more case of volatile memory (RAM) with a coin battery for backup being more reliable and supporting many more read/write cycles that the EEPROM that was available when the 1st gen GPS receivers were built. I have some very old Garmin GPSs that work just fine, except that some of them are confused about the epoch. That depended on the device. O lot of 1st epoch GPSes couldn't resync if the epoch counter was zeroed by total power loss. IIRC my GPS II+ units are in that group, which is why I keep them continuously powered except for 30 seconds every 9-12 months whe n their alkalines are changed. That's not a problem unless the device is also a flight recorder (logger) since it will stamp your flight log with the wrong date (off by about 11 years). It can be more than that - some early receivers could not rsync with the GPS constellation from epoch 1 onward if power loss zeroed their epoch counter - I believe this design fault wasn't recognised until after the first epoch rollover, at which point it was too late for recovery. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04/03/2021 00:01, Martin Gregorie wrote:
And the inability of long-stored GPS units to figure out which "epoch" they really are in is another form of planned obsolescence. I think its more case of volatile memory (RAM) with a coin battery for backup being more reliable and supporting many more read/write cycles that the EEPROM that was available when the 1st gen GPS receivers were built. I have some very old Garmin GPSs that work just fine, except that some of them are confused about the epoch. That depended on the device. O lot of 1st epoch GPSes couldn't resync if the epoch counter was zeroed by total power loss. IIRC my GPS II+ units are in that group, which is why I keep them continuously powered except for 30 seconds every 9-12 months whe n their alkalines are changed. That's not a problem unless the device is also a flight recorder (logger) since it will stamp your flight log with the wrong date (off by about 11 years). It can be more than that - some early receivers could not rsync with the GPS constellation from epoch 1 onward if power loss zeroed their epoch counter - I believe this design fault wasn't recognised until after the first epoch rollover, at which point it was too late for recovery. IF the GPS transmissions that we use included data on which the current epoch is, there would not be a problem, but they don't. Most GPS engines will reset to the epoch in which they were made, not necessarily epoch 0. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 4:56:28 AM UTC-5, Tim Newport-Peace wrote:
IF the GPS transmissions that we use included data on which the current epoch is, there would not be a problem, but they don't. Save a couple of bits in the data packet, lose old equipment... But, is it possible to tell the GPS module what the current date and (approximate) time is? I mean, as a configuration message from the enclosing device. That depends on the GPS module of course. But if they don't build that into the module, that's planned obsolescence. If it is available, but the surrounding device (logger, vario...) doesn't use that feature, ditto. If you think that such a feature would be a burden on the module development, ahem, take a look at the uBlox documentation PDFs, they are hundreds of pages long. This is a lot like the story with digital thermostats I use in my house. I used to have the typical thermostats that need batteries to maintain the real-time-clock, and the program memory, during a power outage. After some searching I did find a few models that do not use batteries at all, store the program in nonvolatile memory, and after a power outage require setting the clock manually. Why are such models so rare? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If all you're looking for is a good backup, and you have a current SeeYou subscription, you can try SeeYouu Navigator. It's availabe on both Android and iOS, and while it's very basic, I think it does well as both a backup recorder (non-secure) and a flight computer.
I wouldn't want to try a big task or competition with it, but I feel it could help me get home. MB |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS Colibri II | Luke Szczepaniak | Soaring | 1 | March 13th 15 10:45 PM |
Distinguishing an LX Navigation Colibri 1 from a Colibri 4? | Papa3[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | October 25th 12 02:49 AM |
Colibri II | Rick[_3_] | Soaring | 5 | May 5th 12 12:33 PM |
Colibri | Fred Blair | Soaring | 2 | August 25th 08 03:24 PM |
FS Colibri | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | March 1st 06 12:26 PM |