![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My autopilot (2-axis, Piper) is hooked up to my DG, via a "heading bug."
Otherwise, it's just a wing leveler. I've been told that this autopilot has the capability of being connected to my VORs. Can anyone outline what's involved with connecting the two? Thanks! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
My autopilot (2-axis, Piper) is hooked up to my DG, via a "heading bug." Otherwise, it's just a wing leveler. I've been told that this autopilot has the capability of being connected to my VORs. Can anyone outline what's involved with connecting the two? Thanks! I suspect what you have is something like a Piper Autocontrol? Two axis? You mean it has altitude-hold? Well, anyway, I think what you need is something like this MITCHELL RADIO COUPLER FOR CENTURY III AUTOPILOT http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...m=2479416 829 ....but (assuming all my assumptions above are true) I predict you won't like it. If there's any unsteadiness at all in the VOR signal, the autopilot will follow the swinging CDI. There's some damping built into the coupler, but still... Even when the VOR signal is rock-steady, all (well, OK, 2) the installations I've seen will "hunt" back and forth across the centerline of the signal. There might be a sensitivity adjustment that will correct this. When I had one, I nearly always used it in heading (not NAV) mode, except for the occasional coupling with a localizer for instrument practice. Actually, I always felt guilty using it on the localizer. It made the approach too easy. Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect what you have is something like a Piper Autocontrol? Two axis?
You mean it has altitude-hold? Hmm. I thought 3-axis was altitude-hold? Whatever, all mine does is hold the wings level, and follow the bug... Thanks for the tips! I'd be interested to hear from folks who have these things -- do they hunt all over, or can that be damped? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I suspect what you have is something like a Piper Autocontrol? Two axis? You mean it has altitude-hold? Hmm. I thought 3-axis was altitude-hold? Whatever, all mine does is hold the wings level, and follow the bug... You're right. In common usage, wing-leveler plus heading mode equals a two-axis autopilot. I've always rebelled against that usage. To me an axis is roll-pitch-yaw. Unless the autopilot controls two of those, it's a one-axis autopilot... but I'm swimming against the tide. Thanks for the tips! I'd be interested to hear from folks who have these things -- do they hunt all over, or can that be damped? Dave Remove SHIRT to reply directly. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
Thanks for the tips! I'd be interested to hear from folks who have these things -- do they hunt all over, or can that be damped? I have a single axis autopilot (Navaid) in my homebuilt. I have it hooked up to my Garmin 195 GPS or to my Narco 122A NAV (via a switch). Tracking the GPS is rock solid - no hunting whatsoever. Tracking the VOR is a roller coaster. I watch the CDI needle, and it's always jumping around a bit, and the AP tries to follow it, even when it goes a dot to the left, and then two seconds later, a dot to the right. The problem is in the VOR, not the AP - if your VOR CDI needle is jumping around a bit, so will the AP when trying to track it. If your VOR needle stays stuck (no clue if this jumping is a function of MY receiver or of the inaccuracy of the basic system), then you'd probably be OK tracking with the AP. If I track an ILS/LOC, which never jumps around on my CDI, the AP is solid, so I know it's not the VOR/AP combination. At any rate, if it's easy to connect, give it a try. If not, don't bother, especially if your needle is jumpy. -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My STEC 20 is slaved can be slaved to my #1 VOR or to my Loran. It has front
panel selection of high and low sensitivity modes. Normally, for VOR's you'd use the low sensitivity mode to minimize the manuevering to stay on a scalloped signal. It flies a VOR radial just fine, no obvious hunting. It is a single axis autopilot. Jay Honeck wrote: I suspect what you have is something like a Piper Autocontrol? Two axis? You mean it has altitude-hold? Hmm. I thought 3-axis was altitude-hold? Whatever, all mine does is hold the wings level, and follow the bug... Thanks for the tips! I'd be interested to hear from folks who have these things -- do they hunt all over, or can that be damped? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article tossc.53968$gr.5228519@attbi_s52, "Jay Honeck"
writes: Thanks for the tips! I'd be interested to hear from folks who have these things -- do they hunt all over, or can that be damped? -- Jay Honeck The Autocontrol III in my Archer has switches that allow it to track a VOR, the LORAN, or the GPS. The LORAN and the GPS (Garmin 430) do a better job of flying a heading and not wandering but I wouldn't say the the VOR is bad. If you are tracking a VOR that is distant and the signal is weak, you might be better to watch the needle and use the heading bug, but if you are close (30 miles) and have a good signal, there isn't much of a problem. Get a 430 though and you will think that you are on rails! Chuck |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
if you are thinking about hooking up a VOR why not a GPS? The outputs can be the same depending on the head configuration. Michelle Jay Honeck wrote: My autopilot (2-axis, Piper) is hooked up to my DG, via a "heading bug." Otherwise, it's just a wing leveler. I've been told that this autopilot has the capability of being connected to my VORs. Can anyone outline what's involved with connecting the two? Thanks! -- Michelle P ATP-ASEL, CP-AMEL, and AMT-A&P "Elisabeth" a Maule M-7-235B (no two are alike) Volunteer Pilot, Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic Volunteer Builder, Habitat for Humanity |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Butler wrote:
: ...but (assuming all my assumptions above are true) I predict you won't like it. : If there's any unsteadiness at all in the VOR signal, the autopilot will : follow the swinging CDI. There's some damping built into the coupler, but : still... Even when the VOR signal is rock-steady, all (well, OK, 2) the : installations I've seen will "hunt" back and forth across the centerline of the : signal. There might be a sensitivity adjustment that will correct this. I also predict that Jay won't like it. I have an "Autoflite I" with the NAV coupler. When coupled to the NAV (NAV1, FWIW), the needle stays dead centered. But, look at the ground track on the GPS! It's moving all over! Who's flying this thing? Seriously, unless you're right on top of the VOR, or it's a Doppler VOR (DVOR), the radials move around. A lot, in fact. The only steady one that I routinely fly over is JFK. When the autopilot is coupled up to the GPS following a radial, the VOR needle moves around. The GPS guides the airplane where the radial is supposed to be! This can get a bit nerve-wracking, especially if you're flying, say, V3 in the gauntlet between ORL's "B" and Cape Canaveral's restricted areas. -- Aaron Coolidge |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lets see.. wing leveler and heading control... sounds close to roll and
yaw.. BT "Dave Butler" wrote in message ... To me an axis is roll-pitch-yaw. Unless the autopilot controls two of those, it's a one-axis autopilot... but I'm swimming against the tide. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rain and autopilot unstable | W9MV | Owning | 3 | May 18th 04 08:51 PM |
mitchell autopilot | dave | Owning | 1 | May 5th 04 06:11 PM |
IMC without an autopilot | Jon Kraus | Instrument Flight Rules | 101 | April 18th 04 07:17 PM |
Chelton AP-3C autopilot | Kyler Laird | Owning | 0 | April 2nd 04 03:08 PM |
KAP140 Autopilot Details | News | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | October 22nd 03 02:01 AM |